Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: 957 Equipe?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    282

    957 Equipe?

    Search Function wasn't too helpful.

    I get the feeling that the 997s are favorites around here, but the 957s don't get much mention. Are they just too old?

    I have a few pairs of the equipes on old skis. They've been stored all nice and warm and dry, I might have even turned the DIN all the way down.

    Can these be safely reused? Is it worth it? Will any shop mount them or will I need to figure it out myself?

    Funds are short, but after lurking around here all season, I suddenly have this need for lots of skis. Thanks a lot.

    Oh, and what does DIN stand for anyway?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    North Van
    Posts
    1,126
    I don't think they're idemnified any more (some shops may not mount them), but they're still great bindings. I have a pair on my Explosivs and have never had any problems...
    Martha's just polishing the brass on the Titanic....

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Skiattle
    Posts
    7,750
    there was a thread regarding the new Z bindings that sparked a lot of good conversation re the 957

    look here

    http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/s...light=bindings


    edit: and good thing people quoted the shit out of that thread, because it looks like the original guy who posted deleted all of his threads.
    Last edited by pechelman; 05-26-2006 at 11:56 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    in the dark
    Posts
    2,198
    Quote Originally Posted by AKWL
    Oh, and what does DIN stand for anyway?Thanks
    Deutsches Institut fur Normung
    the german standards institution

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    333
    Release mechanism is the same on the 957 as the current series of bindings (with the Multicontrol system vs. the Spheric system). The binding itself is fundamentally the same as the current 916/920.

    The problem is age, specifically plastics and exposure to UV light. This causes embrittlement and premature failure of plastic parts. Also, wear and envirmonmental factors (such as salt or lack of grease/grease drying up) may have altered the release characteristics of the binding.

    That said, the 957E is likely still OK whereas the other models of that vintage are a little sketchy. If the binding looks beat it probably is.

    This binding is no longer indemnified due to age (indemnification ends with the 977 series); if you want to use them, you'll have to have the shop drill for a 916 and screw them in yourself, or sign another weaver.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ski-attle
    Posts
    4,217
    These were still indemnified as of last season, no?

    Yup, not anymore. I'm sad now.
    Last edited by bossass; 05-26-2006 at 08:16 PM.
    ROBOTS ARE EATING MY FACE.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    SkiTalk.com
    Posts
    3,375
    Thats a shame that 957's are no linger indemnfied. It was more the 757 and 857's that had the plastic problems. Plus IIRC, the 957's heels were metal.
    Click. Point. Chute.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •