Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: The Arches Saga continues

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    London : the L is for Value!
    Posts
    4,574

    The Arches Saga continues

    http://www.rockclimbing.com/topic/113108

    To summarize :

    Quote Originally Posted by Regs
    No new permanent climbing hardware may be installed in any fixed location. If an
    existing bolt or other hardware item is unsafe, it may be replaced. This will limit all
    climbing to existing routes or new routes not requiring placement of fixed anchors.

    Climbing anchors and/or protection points may not be placed with the use of a hammer
    except to replace existing belay and rappel anchors and bolts on existing routes, or for
    emergency self-rescue.
    edg
    Last edited by edg; 05-22-2006 at 03:09 PM.
    Do you realize that you've just posted an admission of ignorance so breathtaking that it disqualifies you from commenting on any political or economic threads from here on out?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    14,596
    According to Laura, the NPS is getting calls and letters from people asking her to ban climbing in the park. Therefore it is important for climbers to write in and represent their desires and interests to balance out the non-climbers that are asking for a total ban. …
    Thanks again, you fucking asshole.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    1,191
    Canyonlands also has a no new anchor rule. So great story time:

    There was an article in Alpinist, I believe it was issue 3 (not positive). Steve "Crusher" Bartlett (scary desert tower legend), and a couple of his buddies put a up a new route in Monument Basin, off of the White Rim in Canyonlands.

    To get around the no new anchor rule, they hauled up two by fours, and a saw. They cut the wood to size, and spanned a notch on the top of the tower they climbed, rapped off of the two by fours, and then yanked the whole contraption down. Left nothing but a little chalk on the tower.

    Sorry about the thread hijack
    Keep it unclipped

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    1,006
    Personally, I think hauling up a wing and paragliding down would be the sickest way to go.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Not in the PRB
    Posts
    34,667
    In the "beating a dead horse" category...

    Ok, from that thread there is this:
    So prior to 9 May 2006, this was all the Arches National Park website had to say about about climbing, in its “Regulations” section:

    “Climbing

    “The rock at Arches offers excellent climbing opportunities, despite its sandy nature. Most climbing routes in the park require advanced techniques. Permits are not required, unless the trip involves an overnight stay in the backcountry. It the responsibility of all climbers to know and obey the following park regulations:

    “1. Use of motorized drills is prohibited.
    2. Climbing is prohibited on any arch identified on current USGS 7.5 minute topographical maps; on Balanced Rock year-round; on Bubo from January 1st to June 30th; on Industrial Disease on the Devil Dog Spire from January 1st to June 30th.
    3. The use of chalk for climbing must be of a color which blends with the native rock.
    4. Climbers are encouraged to employ clean-climbing ethics, leave dull-colored webbing when recovery is impossible, and access climbing routes via established trails, slickrock or sandy washes.”
    - from http://www.nps.gov/arch/regs.htm
    Now, for whatever reason the NPS has determined that its regs were too ambiguous to prosecute, but I really don't get how the bolded part leaves any doubt as to whether this was ok or not. Nobody has yet explained that to me.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    8,881
    Quote Originally Posted by Danno
    Now, for whatever reason the NPS has determined that its regs were too ambiguous to prosecute, but I really don't get how the bolded part leaves any doubt as to whether this was ok or not. Nobody has yet explained that to me.


    Thanks for yet another thread edg, the stupidity to buried right above your own post in the other one?
    Elvis has left the building

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •