IMO: Don't buy a 16mm camera. While there are good deals to be found, the cost of film is going to break you. Even if you process it yourself, you will still need to take it to a lab and get it transferred to tape so you can edit it, which is not cheap.
I would buy one of Sony's HD handicams for about $4K if I was you. Not only will it cost less in the long run than shooting film, but you can make money with it by freelancing.
Don't get me wrong- right now 16 mm looks better. And right now it is superior for slow motion. But no matter what Kodak tells you, film is a dying format. Digital is improving at an astonishing rate. Look at any issue of Powder. Can you tell the shots taken on film vs, digital? I can't.
Use the student rental cameras for your first couple of projects, ans see how you like the format. IF you really love it, than you might consider buying a 16mm setup. But trust me, once you start adding up all te accessories to go with the camera, expext to spend at least $10K.
But to answer your origina question- buy an Arriflex.
"There is a hell of a huge difference between skiing as a sport- or even as a lifestyle- and skiing as an industry"
Hunter S. Thompson, 1970 (RIP)
Bookmarks