I bought a 300GB hard drive at Staples today for $99.
Not that I know anything about RAIDs, but if anyone else needs storage, that seems pretty cheap.
An old Pentium box with 4 of those would be a cheap 1.2TB nework storage option.
I bought a 300GB hard drive at Staples today for $99.
Not that I know anything about RAIDs, but if anyone else needs storage, that seems pretty cheap.
An old Pentium box with 4 of those would be a cheap 1.2TB nework storage option.
Kill all the telemarkers
But they’ll put us in jail if we kill all the telemarkers
Telemarketers! Kill the telemarketers!
Oh we can do that. We don’t even need a reason
Best rule of thumb is the drive should match as close as possible. Especially specs for the transfer, spin speed, etc. Size does not have to match (but does have to be as big or bigger and the extra portion of the bigger drive would not be usable). So if the exact same model is available then that is best, otherwise a bigger but equal in most every way drive from the same manufacturer is the rule I use.Originally Posted by Nobody Famous
The hot swapping is really a term used for switching out the drive without powering down the computer at all. The drives have capability of being disconnected (either via a tray or similar device usually) with the computer still running and the replacement is slid into the unit and is resynced with the data. You can still do a drive via cold swapping (power down the computer system) and then power back on and the raid can continue the sync etc. after that. Do not confuse the swapping with the controller data syncing recovery features.
Last edited by RShea; 04-10-2006 at 10:53 AM.
If you decide you need raid (due to the size and redunancy issues) then the solution is going to be rather expensive. Again it is about what is acceptable from a storage archiving (if you need all the data on line all the time, or just the most recent projects, etc.) Just like document imaging solutions there are ways of having the data moved off the storage both for archive and back-up. If you can have the last 2 years and prior info archived, then that is cheaper than all 5 years. But if your needs are such that you need to be able to search all 5 years and have it available without going to off line disks, then plan on some major expense. Tape or DVD archives are not eliminated with raid (what happens if the place burns down?)
So this raid box still may need on and off site back-up and it could be set up so only current projects are stored and then moved off after a period of time. Just too many variables and things that need to be discussed for this to be a final recommendation for a solution on a forum like this.
I think a big issue here would be:
"How much are you willing to spend."
That'll clear up alot of random answers here.
I just got one of these in the mail Friday. It's loaded with 12 72G 15,000 RPM SCSI drives connected to a SUN T200 over Fiber. Might be a little more than you are looking to spend though. The StorEdge alone costs ~40,000.![]()
![]()
PSA: Outpost.com, the online site for of Fry's Electronics, has a 300 Gb drive for $100, and a 200 Gb for $70. Go to Hard Drives and Memory > Advertised Specials. I wish Fry's had b&m stores on the EC.Originally Posted by Core Shot
“The best argument in favour of a 90% tax rate on the rich is a five-minute chat with the average rich person.”
- Winston Churchill, paraphrased.
Damn. That's some nice hardware. What are you using it for?Originally Posted by Lurch
We use these at work .... lots of them.
http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/s...eva/index.html
and
http://www1.us.dell.com/content/prod...555&l=en&s=biz
At the last check , we had 2540 Terabytes in our group alone.
If you're looking for the best, cheapest, most efficient, most redundant solution then you're in good company. We all do this whether we're building home systems or outfitting a whole datacentre.
It comes down to one thing. How much cash are you willing to part with and how much space do you need now , in 6 months / 1 year / 2 years / 3 years.
If you can give us these numbers, we can probably give you the most cost effective home solution.
Semper in Pulveris .... Only the depth varies
Originally Posted by wildstyle
LOL, well, right now I need 1T of storage in a raid 5 config. However I project my selfing needing 1~2T per year starting next year. Oh yeah I want to spend the least amount possible.
Is having it as a single growing repository important or could you handle adding a new repository each time you buy a new unit ?
Semper in Pulveris .... Only the depth varies
It is very important to have a single growing repository.Originally Posted by wildstyle
It is all in the controller features, as others have incorrectly stated, there are controllers that will allow expanding the raid depending on the model and some will allow it by adding drives, others by placing higher capacity drives in place of lower.Originally Posted by 3names
http://www.infrant.com/main.html
http://www.drobo.com/
Those are both pretty good for personal, professional-esque NAS' from what I've heard. There was a thread over at FM in General Gear a few weeks ago about the same topic (yes, I know this one is old).
-fool
Bookmarks