Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 34

Thread: Petition to Volkl

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    2,352

    Petition to Volkl

    Ok, the idea here is to gather support for a specific ski from Volkl. I intend to send a link to this thread to Volkl after it has gathered (if it does) sufficient signatures. Please sign this/support it if you agree. Petition below:

    To Whom it May Concern;
    We, the undersigned, would like to express our interest in new version of the Explosiv. We would like an explosiv with a true twin tip, but the rest of the ski remaining similar if not the same. You could offer this new ski relatively easily because it would not require a very different mold from the current Explosiv. Obviously, this new ski would not be a park/pipe ski but the twin tip would rather be intended for more big mountain purposes. Although this new ski may seem to overlap with your current fat twin ski, the Gotama, we believe that a market exists for this stiffer, beefier twin because there are sufficient numbers of skiers who want a twin tip that is both fat and stiff enough for steeps and big faces. Thank you for considering our offer.

    -John Vrolyk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    portland of the west
    Posts
    4,083
    ....and that wizard shit looked dumb
    fine

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    void
    Posts
    363
    And I thought this was about Gotama durability

    It’s so quiet, it’s so cool, it’s so cold

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    6,595
    Yeah and ask 'em where I can find the umlaut on my keyboard. ENOUGH skis get past me on ebay cos of that fuggen umlaut.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Central Valley
    Posts
    3,076
    Originally posted by tuffy109:
    ....and that wizard shit looked dumb
    Hmmm, I don't know. I thought that was one of the best topsheets I've seen. But, whatever.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    portland of the west
    Posts
    4,083
    Originally posted by CS
    Hmmm, I don't know. I thought that was one of the best topsheets I've seen. But, whatever.
    you also live in the valley.
    fine

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    952
    Why do you want the twin? Just trying to figure out what purpose it serves outside of skiing backwards. Unless of course you want to ski "big mountain" type lines backwards. And if so, that would be sweet.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    2,352
    landing backwards occaisonally, sliding backwards w/o slamming the tips into junk and getting them caught, extra versatility. the twin tip doesn't have any disadvantages (OK, yes it reduces the edge length... but just make the ski longer)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    4,101
    Originally posted by bad_roo
    Yeah and ask 'em where I can find the umlaut on my keyboard. ENOUGH skis get past me on ebay cos of that fuggen umlaut.
    Hijack Question: Isn't there an ALT function codenumber for this? Or you could just use : and tip your screen on it's side. No?

    Edit: ALT+0246=ö
    Last edited by trainnvain; 01-08-2004 at 04:33 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Central Valley
    Posts
    3,076
    Originally posted by tuffy109:
    you also live in the valley.
    yeah, and Utah before that. So, maybe you have a point.......

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    schoolszone
    Posts
    698
    I would disagree
    I don't like twins and think the explosiv's tail is just right

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    portland of the west
    Posts
    4,083
    Originally posted by CS
    yeah, and Utah before that. So, maybe you have a point.......
    hahahaha

    you gonna be up on the 24/25th?
    fine

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SF, CA
    Posts
    634
    I have a feeling the decision to go flat had something to do with releasing the Gotama. Marketing reasons.

    I wouldn't mind a half twin on the sploder for ocasional switch landings and skidding around.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Central Valley
    Posts
    3,076
    Originally posted by tuffy109:
    you gonna be up on the 24/25th?
    By "up" I'm assuming you mean Mammoth.

    I'm supposed to go over MLK weekend, but really it all depends on the snow since paying $62 to ski ice isn't all that appealing.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    2,352
    this thread has lost its original purpose... disappeared pretty quick there.

    I thought there was a market for said ski b/c of people talking about it... thought there were a bunch of people talking about it (no just thought, saw)

    hmmmmm

    maybe sometime later

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Central Valley
    Posts
    3,076
    Originally posted by seldon:
    this thread has lost its original purpose... disappeared pretty quick there.
    Oops, sorry seldon.

    He started it.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Snoqualmie
    Posts
    1,298
    Two points:

    I always thought that a twin does have a significant disadvantage for a "big mountain" ski. The curled up tip of a ski creates lift. Having a twin creates lift behind you which you do not want (think the opposite of a swallowtail.)

    Also, isn't the 4FRNT MSP close to what you are looking for (122x92x108 and reputed to be quite stiff in a 185...)

    Or the DB Surreal (124x94x112 in a 193 and a 184?)

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,544
    Originally posted by joshbu
    Two points:

    I always thought that a twin does have a significant disadvantage for a "big mountain" ski. The curled up tip of a ski creates lift. Having a twin creates lift behind you which you do not want (think the opposite of a swallowtail.)
    I think it would create a slight down force, sort of like the spoiler on a race car. But, let's face it, a ski isn't a wing and these forces aren't going to be huge unless you're going about 80 mph.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    2,352
    I don't know much about the 4FRNT... i'll do a search. I asked about the Armada ARV on techtalk but haven't gotten a response yet.

    I have scratch BCs now, and I want something with the stiffness, burliness, and durability of the explosiv (sick and tired of the floppiness of the bc)

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    the sunnyside of the street
    Posts
    170
    Originally posted by The AD
    I think it would create a slight down force, sort of like the spoiler on a race car. But, let's face it, a ski isn't a wing and these forces aren't going to be huge unless you're going about 80 mph.

    Also I'm no physics guru but the fact your legs are in the way there would be no downforce due to the air being broken up before reaching the skis surface
    err huh huh spaghetti?

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    551
    Originally posted by seldon
    I don't know much about the 4FRNT... i'll do a search. I asked about the Armada ARV on techtalk but haven't gotten a response yet.

    I have scratch BCs now, and I want something with the stiffness, burliness, and durability of the explosiv (sick and tired of the floppiness of the bc)
    If you want something stiff, burly and durable, 4FRNT MSP is definately the way to go. They are very stiff because of the maple core they use, have a 2 year warrenty and are very burly. Not to mention it's a great company and I helped make this year's stock of 170s

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    2,352
    Nice....

    I'll have to demo them next time i'm in the mountains...

    are they as stiff as teh xploders?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    551
    Originally posted by seldon
    Nice....

    I'll have to demo them next time i'm in the mountains...

    are they as stiff as teh xploders?
    Where do you ride? I'm not sure how they compare to the xploders since i've never skied on those. but if not the MSPs aren't the stiffest twin tip out there, they are definitely one of them.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Snoqualmie
    Posts
    1,298
    www.4frnt.com (If I'm not too late to avoid people clicking over to newschoolers.com... )

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    2,352
    I'm in the bay area.

    ski mostly at kirwood, alta, squallywood...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •