Hey guys,
Looking at skis for the wife and was wondering if anyone knows how much shorter the actual length of a 158 Dynastar 8800 is compared to a 165 Pocket Rocket. I know the Pocket Rocket skis and measures short because of the bigish twin, but was wondering what the actual difference between the two is....I know getting answers on short skis is a long shot on this board, but thought I'd try anyway....
Results 1 to 2 of 2
Thread: 8800 vs Pocket Rocket length
-
03-22-2006, 07:54 PM #1
Space Monkey
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- North Van
- Posts
- 1,126
8800 vs Pocket Rocket length
Martha's just polishing the brass on the Titanic....
-
03-22-2006, 08:07 PM #2
Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Vermont
- Posts
- 611
I ski the PR's in 175 and my buddy is on the LBF's in 168 and the are pretty much the same. My guess would be the 158 8800's which are the same dimensions as the LBF's ski bigger than the 165 PR's because it is a stiffer ski and has some metal in it.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks