flying with boards
I don't understand why it costs $100 to fly with a surfboard (be it a long or a shortboard) while it costs nothing extra to fly with skis or a snowboard.
I bring this up because my buddy is flying outta IF today and I noticed that bags 50lbs and less are free. Bags 63-80" long should cost $50 extra. Ummm...anyone fly with skis less than 5'3" long? Anyone ever been charged the extra $50 to have your skis or snowboard travel with you on a flight? I have never flown with skis shorter than 5'3" and I have never been charged extra to check skis onto a plane.
My point is that my surfboard weighs less than 50#s, fits into the 63-80" length criteria and should only cost $50 extra to bring with me as should my skis. That or my surfboard should be free to bring on a plane as my skis are.
I have been charged $100 extra to bring my surfboard along with me to Hawaii (true it was a different airline but I bet my skis would have gone on the same trip for free). Is this some kind of anti-surfer/pro-skier conspiracy? "Come On!!!" The weight of my surfboard is not going to make us crash any faster than that of the 300# lady sitting next to me. The gerth of my stick isn't going to keep anyone else's luggage from getting on the plane. So, WTF?!?!? is up with charging double the extra to bring a surfboard on your trip and nothing to bring your skis/snowboard? Maybe us surfers are paying for us skiers/snowboarders free ride?
Sorry about the rant but maybe some airline type mags can shed some light. on this conundrum.
If you had a nickel for every nickel he has, you would have a lot of fuckin' nickels!
Bookmarks