Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: "fat" race skis?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    europe
    Posts
    114

    "fat" race skis?

    i just watched orf1 (austrian tv channel) that analyzed those horrible women's dh training crashes today.
    armin assinger (former kick ass wc skier) suggested getting rid of all the lift underneath the bindings and to "increase ski width by 1-2cm". that would mean 80mm waist race skis. maybe even wider. i bet those would be pretty sweet midfats...
    another guy (i think it was toni sailer, another (older) austrian racing legend) seems to be involved in some fis committe (sp). he hinted that at the end of the season the fis might increase the mininum radii (i think for gs 30m, sg 45m and dh 50m or something like that).
    i like the idea of wider race skis though.
    what are your opinions?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,936
    I'm gonna guess he meant 1 to 2 mm.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    north by northwest
    Posts
    9,456
    as much flak as this will get pointed my way, i believe the doodz at epicski will be able to give you more interesting opinions.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    europe
    Posts
    114
    shmerham: no, he said cm. because the crashes today resulted from the "aggressive" snow, the skiers caught edges and didn't have enough time to react. assinger thinks that wider skis and lower binding height would decrease the risk of catching an edge and give the skiers more time to react

    f2f: i guess that some of the maggots would appreciate burly long midfats as a quiver addition though, at least way more than the doodz from epicski.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    23,145
    from what little i know, his suggestion would achieve the desired effect but wouldnt it cost them edge to edge fast reaction?
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    europe
    Posts
    114
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit
    from what little i know, his suggestion would achieve the desired effect but wouldnt it cost them edge to edge fast reaction?
    i guess that's the plan, at the same time it's more forgiving though if you catch an edge (i think...)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    6,110
    That might work in DH or SG, where you're a lot more dependent on choosing and holding the proper line than on making a lightning-quick transition.

    Of course, a wider ski with less lift means more torque on the boot and ankle, and the dynamic response of a ski will change radically if you increase the width by 25%.

    In the 1970s, wasn't the racer fashion to have as *little* lift as possible? Bindings of the time had no lift at all, and I seem to remember people grinding out the bottom of their boots to get their foot closer to the ski...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Earf
    Posts
    298
    wide skis also glide slower and more awkwardly
    Cruise-ships of choice:
    http://www.skif-sport.ru/skis/img/salomon/AK%20Rocket%20Pilot%2003%20892214.GIF

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •