Check Out Our Shop
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 59

Thread: Santa Cruz Nomad?

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    ovah deyah
    Posts
    1,921
    Quote Originally Posted by The Reverend Floater
    I sold my bike last winter since I had to take year off from shoulder surgery. I had a Santa Cruz Superlight and I absolutely loved it. It was getting pretty old and beat, but the fit and feel was perfect for me.

    I am now looking at a proform and I'm hearing lots of good stuff about the Nomad. Anyone ridden one? How is it going to compare to the Superlight? I know it's not as "cross countryesque" as the Superlight, but how different will it be? I am generally a CC rider around here. Thanks.
    totally different ride than a Superlght. For a similar ride in a burlier, newer package try the Heckler.

    the Nomad uses VPP suspension design, which results in a very numb trail feel. the Heckler is basically a beefier Superlight frame with more travel and a slacker head angle. it's going to feel most like your Superlight.

    the Nomad will be a great bike, it's just going to feel less like your Superlight. on a ProDeal form, I'd suggest getting the better more chi-chi Nomad and just adjusting to the new feel.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    ovah deyah
    Posts
    1,921
    Quote Originally Posted by Arty50
    Caption on the front of the latest Colorado Cyclist catalogue:

    "Mark Weir, 24-hour four-man National Champion, riding his Santa Cruz Nomad."

    Who knows if he actually rode 24 hours on a Nomad. But the bike just looks sooooo sexy on the cover. Dooooo ittttttt!!!!! Get the plush bike. Screw that pansy nancy 4" crap.
    whatever Weir rode, it was Weir that made it happen, not the bike.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    ovah deyah
    Posts
    1,921
    Quote Originally Posted by assgasorgrass
    Start blowing the guys at the Turner shop, and pro-form a 5-spot.
    Turner bikes will ruin you for any other mfr's ride. they kill.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Huh?
    Posts
    10,908
    Quote Originally Posted by uncle crud
    Turner bikes will ruin you for any other mfr's ride. they kill.
    It's hard to argue with this. Riding my 5-Spot is like being married to Elle MacPherson and having sex 5 times a day. When I demo'd a 6-Pack I felt like I was married to Jennifer Connelly and the count went up to 10.
    "I knew in an instant that the three dollars I had spent on wine would not go to waste."

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    710
    I'm debating 5-spot('05) versus new Motolite.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    ovah deyah
    Posts
    1,921
    Quote Originally Posted by Arty50
    It's hard to argue with this. Riding my 5-Spot is like being married to Elle MacPherson and having sex 5 times a day. When I demo'd a 6-Pack I felt like I was married to Jennifer Connelly and the count went up to 10.
    don't I know what you mean. this is like the Mulholland Falls version of Ms Connelly.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Huh?
    Posts
    10,908
    Ooooooooh...droooooool...
    "I knew in an instant that the three dollars I had spent on wine would not go to waste."

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Central Valley
    Posts
    3,078
    Quote Originally Posted by Arty50
    Ooooooooh...droooooool...
    Looks like a Kona. Does it ride any different?

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    4,125
    Quote Originally Posted by CS
    Looks like a Kona. Does it ride any different?
    CS showing us his humorous side.

  10. #35
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Huh?
    Posts
    10,908
    Quote Originally Posted by CS
    Looks like a Kona. Does it ride any different?
    Kona = Rosanne Barr
    "I knew in an instant that the three dollars I had spent on wine would not go to waste."

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Central Valley
    Posts
    3,078
    Quote Originally Posted by Arty50
    Kona = Rosanne Barr
    Yeah, but you took Jennifer Connelly over Elle MacPherson, so your comparisons mean nothing to me.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Huh?
    Posts
    10,908
    Quote Originally Posted by CS
    Yeah, but you took Jennifer Connelly over Elle MacPherson, so your comparisons mean nothing to me.
    But I already have Elle.
    "I knew in an instant that the three dollars I had spent on wine would not go to waste."

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Central Valley
    Posts
    3,078
    If you already have Elle, why downgrade to Jennifer?

    Either way, these bikes look the same.




  14. #39
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    between here and there
    Posts
    6,230
    I agree with CS (gasp), its looks cool, but it ain't sexy. If its Jennifery Connelly, she has spent some time at the buffet and had some plastic surgery that went horribly wrong.
    More fucked up than a cricket in a hubcap

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    4,125
    i have ridden both. Looks can be decieving.

    (I am talking about bikes here, not Roseanne and Jennifer.....BTW, check out Jennifer in the Rocketeer, ummmmm.)

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    ovah deyah
    Posts
    1,921
    Quote Originally Posted by CS
    Looks like a Kona. Does it ride any different?
    of course not.

    on the same line of thinking, yo' mama looked like a good shag, but...

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    ovah deyah
    Posts
    1,921
    Quote Originally Posted by CS
    If you already have Elle, why downgrade to Jennifer?

    Either way, these bikes look the same.
    oh my. if that's how you make decisions, please let me know your favorite skis, I can have 3 pair to you in 3 weeks for less than you paid for the one pair you now own. they will LOOK JUST LIKE your current skis. they'll be worth at least what you pay for them, I promise.

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    ovah deyah
    Posts
    1,921
    Quote Originally Posted by lph
    i have ridden both. Looks can be decieving.

    (I am talking about bikes here, not Roseanne and Jennifer.....BTW, check out Jennifer in the Rocketeer, ummmmm.)
    I've ridden both too. sure, the Kona looks like an Ellsworth too. it looks like a Banshee Chapparal. it looks like a lot of bikes.

    and a Wiedemann's can looks like a Budweiser can.

    and an American pronunciation of Hyundai sounds almost like Honda doesn't it?

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Shadynasty's Jazz Club
    Posts
    10,330
    Post padding brand whores = sooo hot right now.

    CS, at least in those pics they're marginally different. Toss in this year's Turner and the only difference is bushings (oh, and the number on the price tag).

    Ex Turner Whore signing off.
    Remind me. We'll send him a red cap and a Speedo.

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Central Valley
    Posts
    3,078
    Quote Originally Posted by uncle crud
    oh my. if that's how you make decisions, please let me know your favorite skis, I can have 3 pair to you in 3 weeks for less than you paid for the one pair you now own. they will LOOK JUST LIKE your current skis. they'll be worth at least what you pay for them, I promise.
    I don't even know what the hell this means or what you are trying to say.


    Quote Originally Posted by uncle crud
    I've ridden both too. sure, the Kona looks like an Ellsworth too. it looks like a Banshee Chapparal. it looks like a lot of bikes.

    and a Wiedemann's can looks like a Budweiser can.

    and an American pronunciation of Hyundai sounds almost like Honda doesn't it?
    so then enlighten me. Honestly. All those 4-bar looking bikes look the same to me and honestly I never looked into the differences, except some are way more expensive than others (enter Turner and Ellsworth). So, how is it different and why is the Turner ride so worth the boutique price you pay for the frame?

    On an aside, I won't lie, the Highline is one badass piece of machinery, and I could see it being my next big rig.

    Oh, and Rev, sorry to douche up this thread, but it was kinda fun. (and I'm trying to get it back on track)

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    ovah deyah
    Posts
    1,921
    as with skis the whole execution of the engineering intent is what makes the bike ride as it does. Turner used Horst Link designs on his non-DH/non-4X bikes up until '06 where he switched the pivot arrangement to avoid the Horst Leitner patent royalty, to establish his independence.

    Turners are designed to be stable and corner well, regardless of their intended application. Turner Flux/Nitrous, the uberlight 4" travel race XC machine, is well known for destroying most XC bikes in cornering and stability. the trait is consistent throughout the line. I've ridden many different bikes, and none but Knolly Bikes can corner as well IMO. some DH rigs might compare to the Turner DHR for cornering prowess, but I doubt that you'll find a similar category bike that handles as well as a Highline, RFX/6-Pack, 5-Spot or Nitrous/Flux.

    Dave Turner says it's because he wants the bikes to be stable and corner well, and he designs the suspension parts and the frame weight distribution with that in mind.

    whatever it is, I feel it when I ride it, compared to other bikes I've ridden.

    tag that, bagley.

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    3,137
    Quote Originally Posted by Arty50
    "Mark Weir, 24-hour four-man National Champion, riding his Santa Cruz Nomad."
    Mark lives in Marin and is an animal. He will haul a Nomad up and down Tam just to get a workout...

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    23
    I've owned a superlight, heckler, blur and nomad. I have not had a bad ride yet on the nomad. That's including 30 mile epics in Fruita and Moab, and 5 hour rides at home. There is no reason why anyone should not buy one. It is an awsome ride. OK, the ONLY reason not to get one is because they are so FKN expensive (or you've got something against SC)! Get the nomad and set it up for you (light for xc, or stout for anything but sick FR). I don't think you can go wrong.

  24. #49
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Warm, Flat and Dry
    Posts
    3,307
    Quote Originally Posted by CS
    Honestly. All those 4-bar looking bikes look the same to me and honestly I never looked into the differences, except some are way more expensive than others (enter Turner and Ellsworth). So, how is it different and why is the Turner ride so worth the boutique price you pay for the frame?
    So, what's the difference between these.... Floating toe bar, underfoot compression springs, angled toe plate, and heel clip...

    Why is one worth the boutique prices...
    "if the city is visibly one of humankind's greatest achievements, its uncontrolled evolution also can lead to desecration of both nature and the human spirit."
    -- Melvin G. Marcus 1979

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Central Valley
    Posts
    3,078
    Quote Originally Posted by Telenater
    So, what's the difference between these.... Floating toe bar, underfoot compression springs, angled toe plate, and heel clip...

    Why is one worth the boutique prices...
    Well, besides the fact that the voile looks like it belongs on snowblades and would snap in half just at the site of beefy boots and big skis, I couldn't tell you what the difference is.

    I was just giving the Turner homers a little shit with the Kona comparison at first, but I really am curious as to what makes the ride so much better than other faux four bar linkage bikes, especially now that they no longer have the Horst Link.

    Uncle crud, what is it that makes the bike so masterful at cornering? And it seems a pretty bold statement that no bike handles as good as a Turner (whatever that really means).

    Lastly, I think all this jabber is lame anyways. If you can ride, you can "handle" any decent bike. I'm pretty sure I can ride a Kona just as well as I can ride a Turner. There may be some nuances you have to get used to but in the end, it's all just going downhill anyways (we won't go into the uphill part because, well, that part is lame).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •