Check Out Our Shop
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 142

Thread: CO. mags - your favorite traffic problem discussed....

  1. #76
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Alco-Hall of Fame
    Posts
    2,997
    Unfortunately, this whole discussion begs the overriding question:

    How (if) do we want to provide or limit people's access to certain types/areas of recreation?

    Do we want sacrifice sites and use density in some areas to trade for low use hard to access areas.... or spread out medium use density.


    ???????????????????????????????????????????????

    Where oh where shall the people live?
    "It is not the result that counts! It is not the result but the spirit! Not what - but how. Not what has been attained - but at what price.
    - A. Solzhenitsyn

  2. #77
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,244
    Lyle Lanley: Well, sir, there's nothing on earth
    Like a genuine,
    Bona fide,
    Electrified,
    Six-car
    Monorail!
    What'd I say?

    Ned Flanders: Monorail!

    Lyle Lanley: What's it called?

    Patty+Selma: Monorail!

    Lyle Lanley: That's right! Monorail!

    [crowd chants `Monorail' softly and rhythmically]

    Miss Hoover: I hear those things are awfully loud...

    Lyle Lanley: It glides as softly as a cloud.

    Apu: Is there a chance the track could bend?

    Lyle Lanley: Not on your life, my Hindu friend.

    Barney: What about us brain-dead slobs?

    Lyle Lanley: You'll be given cushy jobs.

    Abe: Were you sent here by the devil?

    Lyle Lanley: No, good sir, I'm on the level.

    Wiggum: The ring came off my pudding can.

    Lyle Lanley: Take my pen knife, my good man.

    I swear it's Springfield's only choice...
    Throw up your hands and raise your voice!

    All: Monorail!

    Lyle Lanley: What's it called?

    All: Monorail!

    Lyle Lanley: Once again...

    All: Monorail!

    Marge: But Main Street's still all cracked and broken...

    Bart: Sorry, Mom, the mob has spoken!

    All: Monorail!
    Monorail!
    Monorail!

    [big finish]

    Monorail!

    Homer: Mono... D'oh!

  3. #78
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    8,881
    Quote Originally Posted by lemon boy
    Unfortunately, this whole discussion begs the overriding question:

    How (if) do we want to provide or limit people's access to certain types/areas of recreation?

    Do we want sacrifice sites and use density in some areas to trade for low use hard to access areas.... or spread out medium use density.


    ???????????????????????????????????????????????

    Where oh where shall the people live?
    Easy there tiger. You've sprung the urban planning debate a bit too quickly after the mass transport discussion. People might begin to think of California...
    Elvis has left the building

  4. #79
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    2,270
    Quote Originally Posted by board
    Ask Ogdenville or North Haverbrook how much they like theirs.

    Niles seems to like his

    http://www.monorails.org/tMspages/Niles.html

  5. #80
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    North Coast
    Posts
    2,615
    Modular busses! Modular busses!

    Seriously, I don't think the busway is a bad idea at all, modular or no.

    I like the double-deckering of the road, of course... Glenwood canyon is a masterful example of how well this can go. Of course, that project was years late and several lottery tickets over budget.
    It's idomatic, beatch.

  6. #81
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,244
    Actually I would love to see a Mag-Lev train. Those things would kick serious ass, and cut the commute to what, 20 minutes from Downtown to say Dillon?

  7. #82
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    15,674
    Quote Originally Posted by homerjay
    This discussion is great and all, but I think the process is far enough along where CDOT has selected their preferred alternative and it's selective widening and a guided busway. Idaho Springs, when widened, will probably go 'stacked' like Glenwood Canyon.
    Selective widening? So we're looking at different sections where the highway goes from 2 lanes to 3, then a few miles later it goes back down to 2? That's great. There will be a backup at each one of those when it goes from 3 to 2.

  8. #83
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    15,674
    Just for reference, how is the traffic in UT on the way to the ski resorts? If it isn't bad, then you have your answer right there- $1000 season passes.

  9. #84
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    mt evans
    Posts
    651
    problem w/ mag-lev is the change in elevations along the roadway. those that exist right now have very little change in grade. although 20 minute travel would kick ass

  10. #85
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,244
    Lloyd: It's 8 miles of access road up a dead end canyon. Different beast entirely.

    Dude: PSHAW. I spit on your elevations:

    Last edited by Tippster; 01-25-2006 at 04:11 PM.

  11. #86
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    775
    Quote Originally Posted by Lurch
    I like the idea of turning 285 into a 4 lane highway all the way to BV with connection to I70 over Hoosier Pass and through Leadville.
    Why not to Breckenridge over Boreas Pass? The elevation is similar to Hoosier pass, and it'd be shorter.

    Of course, any solution that requires a 5-mile-long tunnel is DOA, since it would probably cost too much. Either Hoosier or Boreas routes would require going through Breckenridge otherwise, which is already clogged at ski-time rush hours.
    Change is good. You go first.

  12. #87
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Not in the PRB
    Posts
    34,625
    Quote Originally Posted by Lloyd Christmas
    Just for reference, how is the traffic in UT on the way to the ski resorts? If it isn't bad, then you have your answer right there- $1000 season passes.
    and how would that reduce summer traffic, which is way worse than winter traffic?

  13. #88
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    651
    That's it. Drain the Oceans.

  14. #89
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Hanging out with Yodie and Grison
    Posts
    1,000
    Quote Originally Posted by Yossarian
    Couple mistaken assumptions here:



    First of all, let's start to use the technology that already exists out there. You're assuming that just because I said "toll" means I want to build toll plazas per the norm. Time to think differently.
    Actually, I wasn't. I imagine there would be a variable fee to discourage peak travel.

    Quote Originally Posted by Yossarian
    And oh but wait, that shiny brand new bus system on the directed flow lane that gets built later if needed picks up right there at the massive free parking RTD park and ride at the base of 70, just to make you think a third time about driving yourself up.
    That I agree with.


    Quote Originally Posted by Yossarian
    With no traffic, it's a 1.5 hour drive into Summit County, + or - depending on final destination. With traffic, it can, realitically, be a 4 hour drive.

    You have the option to drive your car up between the hours of 7am and 10am at a cost of $15 and back between 3:00pm and 6:00pm at a cost of $15, or you can pay $5 round trip at other times of the day. Your car can comfortably fit 3 people and gear, including you.

    What do you do?
    Okay, let's modify your game.
    You have the option to drive your car up between the hours of 7am and 10am and sit in traffic for 3 hours and back between 3:00pm and 6:00pm at and sit in traffic for 3 hours or you spend three hours round trip at other times of the day. Your car can comfortably fit 3 people and gear, including you.

    What do most people do? Sit in traffic. Your cumulative $30 toll will have the same effect on people's behavior, ie nothing. The toll needs to be something outrageous, like > $50 during peak times, UNLESS you have 4 or more people in a car, then the toll is waived. But, I agree that this stinks of exclusivity.
    A lot of people earn their turns. Some just get bigger checks.

  15. #90
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Alco-Hall of Fame
    Posts
    2,997
    Quote Originally Posted by Danno
    and how would that reduce summer traffic, which is way worse than winter traffic?
    Fee Demo x 100 BEYOTCH!
    "It is not the result that counts! It is not the result but the spirit! Not what - but how. Not what has been attained - but at what price.
    - A. Solzhenitsyn

  16. #91
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    15,674
    Knock on wood, but apparently I've been driving a different I-70 this year. I've been skiing just about every weekend (granted, its usually only once/wknd) and I haven't taken 3 hrs to get to Summit Co from Boulder. In fact, it hasn't taken more than 2 hours. Maybe its because I'm smart and take US-6 thru the canyon near Golden, but I don't get it. I usually leave at 6:30, and am in SuCo by 8:15-8:30 at the latest. On the way home, I either take off early (before 3:00) or stick around and go home late (5:30-6:00). It isn't that hard.

    I can't speak to the summer driving because I haven't ventured up I-70 much then, but the few times I did last year I had no problems.

  17. #92
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    254
    I don't see how you could force ski resorts to raise their season pass prices. I think that might be collusion (COMMUNISTS!!!!). Also, every year I've been here I've seen the season passes go up 10$/yr. Give it time and the market will equalize itself (season passes will go way up OR CDOT expands I-70 OR numbers of mountain visitors drop OR most likely a combination). I'd say we're pretty close to equilibrium as it is, or maybe I chose my days and hours of travel using my brain and past experiences. (or maybe I'm used to Houston traffic problems)

  18. #93
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Not in the PRB
    Posts
    34,625
    Quote Originally Posted by Lloyd Christmas
    Knock on wood, but apparently I've been driving a different I-70 this year. I've been skiing just about every weekend (granted, its usually only once/wknd) and I haven't taken 3 hrs to get to Summit Co from Boulder. In fact, it hasn't taken more than 2 hours. Maybe its because I'm smart and take US-6 thru the canyon near Golden, but I don't get it. I usually leave at 6:30, and am in SuCo by 8:15-8:30 at the latest. On the way home, I either take off early (before 3:00) or stick around and go home late (5:30-6:00). It isn't that hard.

    I can't speak to the summer driving because I haven't ventured up I-70 much then, but the few times I did last year I had no problems.
    If it isn't bad, why do we need $1000 passes?

    The canyon vs I-70 doesn't make much difference, and I can't speak to weekend mornings or evenings because I usually go up Friday night and come back Sunday after ~ 7:00pm.

    summer traffic is different, because the times are not as defined. There isn't likely to be traffic going into the mountains, but sunday afternoons/evenings can be brutal. If you drove back at those times on a Sunday and din't hit traffic, you were lucky.

  19. #94
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    North Coast
    Posts
    2,615
    Quote Originally Posted by Lloyd Christmas
    I've been skiing just about every weekend (granted, its usually only once/wknd) and I haven't taken 3 hrs to get to Summit Co from Boulder. In fact, it hasn't taken more than 2 hours.
    Well, yer fucked. Keep that tank full, buddy.
    It's idomatic, beatch.

  20. #95
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    15,674
    Quote Originally Posted by Danno
    If it isn't bad, why do we need $1000 passes?

    The canyon vs I-70 doesn't make much difference, and I can't speak to weekend mornings or evenings because I usually go up Friday night and come back Sunday after ~ 7:00pm.

    summer traffic is different, because the times are not as defined. There isn't likely to be traffic going into the mountains, but sunday afternoons/evenings can be brutal. If you drove back at those times on a Sunday and din't hit traffic, you were lucky.
    Just a suggestion.

    I believe it does make a difference (I-70 vs Us-6). It seems a lot of times there is a huge backup around Evergreen. I know there was a few weeks ago when it took my friend 3.5 hrs to get to A-Basin from Denver and it took me 1hr 45min.

  21. #96
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Bouldenver, Colorado
    Posts
    3,635
    agreed, the buildup on 6 is actually a bit later than on 70 in the AM.
    Thrutchworthy Production Services

  22. #97
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Not in the PRB
    Posts
    34,625
    ok, well, what do I know, I'm going from memory of years ago before I started going up on Friday nights.

    On the way back, however, the canyon is usually slower, fucking casino monkeys going 20 miles per hour.

  23. #98
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Aspen
    Posts
    9,565
    Seems like the same conversation we have 2-3 times a year... anyway.....

    Anyone notice the traffic getting worse this year? Last weekend the traffic was backed up to Golden. In 5 years, I have never seen that before. I try to go up Friday nights as much as possible, but even then, there is still quite a bit of traffic, but it doesn't really slow ya down.

    As for the 6 VS 70 debate, 70 is always faster on the way back. On the way there, it is a toss up, but if 70 gets clogged you can get around it.

  24. #99
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    254
    Quote Originally Posted by funkendrenchman
    Last weekend the traffic was backed up to Golden. In 5 years, I have never seen that before.
    I went up Sunday, basically had 70 and abasin to myself. Almost felt like I was missing something important

  25. #100
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    775
    Quote Originally Posted by Danno
    On the way back, however, the canyon is usually slower, fucking casino monkeys going 20 miles per hour.
    On the way back, the backup generally disappears right where 6 branches off, since I-70 goes to three lanes.
    Change is good. You go first.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •