
Originally Posted by
Superstar Punani
Been a surfer since 11, and a skier since 18. Here's the similarities and differences....
Similarities....
- Both have a bullshit learning curve. You have to put in a lot of time and effort and it will take you years to get somewhat good at it.
- Both are lifestyles. You can spend your life travelling the planet in pursuit of either...or both. If you decide to do both then you'll need to live in a place that will let you do both in a world-class setting. Even then there will be trade-offs between the quality of one vs. the other. Over the past 20 years I've lived in Sydney, SF, Tahoe, LA, then SF again. Oz had insane surf, and is a short, cheap flight away from Indo, but the skiing was shit. CA has Tahoe, but shittier waves than Oz.
I know there are other cities out there where you can go surf or ski- NYC, Vancouver, Portland, Tokyo, Auckland and Seattle come to mind but the key is "easy access" to "good" snow/waves.
My personal criteria- Big metropolitan city no more than 30 minutes from the Pacific Ocean, and no more than a 6 hour drive to get pow.
Differences
- Skiing can be learned at a later time in life, whereas if you weren't surfing by puberty then you'd probably be stuck in intermediocrity (not that there's anything wrong with that).
- You can be a good skier and live far from the mountains. I've yet to meet a good surfer who lives far from the beach.
- Good surf is reliant on a shitload of factors: Tide, swell size, swell direction, spot, wind, crowds, local vibe. All these need to come together, and when they do you get what you can- it may not be there tomorrow, or a few hours later.
With pow all you need is a dump and you're ready to play. Over my life the ratio is about 10 insane powder days to 1 insane surf day. That being said, any surf trip trumps any ski trip.
- Local vibe- surfers are inherently selfish and territorial creatures competing for waves. Unlike skiing, you can always hike to your stash. If you go anywhere hassled/crowded/localized (read: North Shore / Westside Oahu, Steamer Lame, Superbank) you're gonna keep a low profile and "ease" your way into the crowd before you start picking off the good ones. Whereas in skiing you can pretty much go to the best places (Cham, Alta, W-B, Tahoe) and ski wherever the fuck you want, make friends with the locals and ski with them.
- Cheap thrills- If the surf is flat/small/mushy/crap it's gonna suck. Sure you can have fun, but nothing will get the adrenaline juices flowing. With skiing you can go out on a shitty icy day with no snow, and still get your cock rocked (Think following 666 on Ooops after it hasn't snowed for a month, or straightlining the Wall to Buckboard when it's been winch-groomed)
- Expenses- All you need is a board and maybe a wetsuit and you're set to go. Skiing required a snow-capable car, a pass/ticket, and a shitload of gear.
All this being sprayed, I can't pick just one. I must have both for a happy existence. But given a choice between a day of bottomless blower pow, or a day of mindblowing barrels I'd take the green room over the white room.
Bookmarks