Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31

Thread: Dilema:Volkl Explosiv vs. Bro's??

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    88

    Dilema:Volkl Explosiv vs. Bro's??

    I have been reading this site for a long time and now just decided to register. As the title says I have a little dilema in picking a ski to get. (Right now I am riding the Volkl G4/AX4's and love them). I have done some research and talked to some people and these skis both appear to be very similar. Both are very strong, well made, and have a huge following. They both have similar dimensions, with the bros being a little wider:
    Explosiv- 120-95-112
    Bro- 125-99-114

    I haven't had a chance to try either of these out yet and I won't before I buy them. I am gonna have to do a blind buy and go off of what I hear from you guys and feel is the better buy. What would be some pros and cons of both. I really like the bro, always nice to help out a fellow mag and get some killer skis in the process.
    Last edited by NorgeViking; 12-11-2005 at 12:09 PM.

  2. #2
    Vets's Avatar
    Vets is offline Orange Mocha Frappuccino!
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Topaz, NV
    Posts
    3,893
    Bros.

    I have skied both. (30+ days on Explosives, 90+ days on Bros)

    Both are:
    - stable at speed
    - have good edge hold
    - wide enough for pow, wind blown, and crud

    I have found the Bros to be a more versatile ski. It is easier to adjust turn shapes with the Bro. I find the Bro to be better for tree skiing and funky snow conditions.
    The Bro is also much lighter than the Explosive.

    The stiff Bro is just slightly stiffer than the Explosive.
    The soft is, of course, softer and the Pro-Bro/Bro-Pro is much stiffer than the Explosive.

    I like the Bros much better. In fact I sold my Explosives and bought a second pair of Bros. My first pair are aspen core stiffs. My new pair are aspen core softs.

    I would guess that your next decison is what flex Bro do you want to go with.
    What is your height/weight and where/how do you ski?
    Also, feel free to ask more specific questions.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Banff
    Posts
    22,524
    as said

    bros = any flex you want

    exp = only one flex (about a med in bro world)

    go Bro, support the cause

    both very durable

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In the rain
    Posts
    1,621
    What are you intending to ski and where do you ski.

    I own both Bro's and Explosives.

    The Bros have a larger natural turn radius than the explosive. But they short turn easier because they weigh less. The bros are more snappy due to having no metal in them.

    For consistent rock bashing (lake louise early season) the Explosives are more durable - but your a hard man if you can kill the Bros - many tried to kill mine and just ended up limping.

    Explosives are more recognized, the Bro's have more Kudos

    Both are fine at Mach loony speeds, both will ski hard hardpack well if pushed. Neither is an easy turn ski.
    Knowledge is Powder

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Banff
    Posts
    22,524
    Quote Originally Posted by Idris
    Neither is an easy turn ski.
    unless you have the super soft Bro's

    how is Cham?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by Vets
    I would guess that your next decison is what flex Bro do you want to go with.
    What is your height/weight and where/how do you ski?
    Also, feel free to ask more specific questions.
    I would get the stiff flex from what I have read about them. I am 5'11 and 180. I only ski in the West (Colo and Utah). I love open bowls and powder. I am starting to get into steeps and love crusing at speed. I am a good skier, but I am nowhere close to being as good as some of they guys on this board. I am probably a level 7 skier but that should change as I keep progressing. I would love to know how these would compare to my Volkl G4's? Are the stiffs gonna be a lot stiffer, or just marginally so?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    BBQ Capital of the World
    Posts
    453
    I am interested in this comparison as well, maybe one of these will be my ski for next year. From what I have heard, I would go with the Bros.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Jack Tone Road
    Posts
    12,735
    Bro stiffs are sold out I b'lieve (at least it says so on www.pmgear.com . Splat has some cosmetic seconds in Gear Swap though; I don't know the flex.

    So that might help you out.

  9. #9
    Vets's Avatar
    Vets is offline Orange Mocha Frappuccino!
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Topaz, NV
    Posts
    3,893
    Quote Originally Posted by NorgeViking
    I would get the stiff flex from what I have read about them. I am 5'11 and 180. I only ski in the West (Colo and Utah). I love open bowls and powder. I am starting to get into steeps and love crusing at speed. I am a good skier, but I am nowhere close to being as good as some of they guys on this board. I am probably a level 7 skier but that should change as I keep progressing. I would love to know how these would compare to my Volkl G4's? Are the stiffs gonna be a lot stiffer, or just marginally so?
    I am close to the same height and weight and ski the stiff Bros around Tahoe and Mammoth. Open bowls, tight trees, and everything in between. The Bros inspire confidence on steeps and I haven't found my speed limit when cruising.
    I have found it very humbling to ski with others from the board. However, it has also made me a better skier. I think that you will also find that skiing on the Bros will make you a better skier too.
    You will definitely appreciate the Bros over your G4s when you go off piste. I don't think that the stiffs will feel much stiffer than the G4s, just different and better.
    I agree very much with Idris when he says:
    The Bros have a larger natural turn radius than the explosive. But they short turn easier because they weigh less. The bros are more snappy due to having no metal in them.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Creekside
    Posts
    1,655
    Quote Originally Posted by Steven S. Dallas
    Bro stiffs are sold out I b'lieve (at least it says so on www.pmgear.com . Splat has some cosmetic seconds in Gear Swap though; I don't know the flex.

    So that might help you out.
    Yeh but it sounds like they are going to be making some more when they do the shorty's run.

    So it depends if you can wait or not....

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Earf
    Posts
    298
    mantra or bro
    Cruise-ships of choice:
    http://www.skif-sport.ru/skis/img/salomon/AK%20Rocket%20Pilot%2003%20892214.GIF

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    PacNW
    Posts
    954
    What size G4 are you on?

    I had a set of 180 explosives and thought they were a better on the groomers than my stiff Bros. Both are stable at speed, but the extra width on the Bros is noticable when setting an edge on hardpack. At 180, the explosive is turny and fun in tight spots.

    I never tried the 190 exploders but thought they wouldn't have enough tip to help with the initiation at that length. The 180's skied short and didn't float my girth well enough so I sold them to get the extra float and lenght of the Bros.

    I love the Bros on all but the super deep and light days (very rare around here) and on groomer days. On cascade concrete, dust on crust, manky mashed potatoes, creamed corn, and day old storm snow, they fukkin rule.

    Sounds like the Bro would be a good choice if the length is OK. If you don't need stiff boards, a set of last years seth pistols or this year's vicious in 189 would do the trick. Simiar dimensions to the Bro and Explosive, but with a little more shape and softer tip for easier initiation.
    "Don't tease me about my hobbies, I don't tease you about being an asshole"

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Eurozone
    Posts
    2,735
    Had both 180 and 190 Exploders, can confirm the 180 having slightly better edgehold (they're maybe less flexing) on hardpack but being too short for the really deep stuff. Still a nice AT ski though. Also sold the 180s and kept the 190s.
    Added the Bros in a flex in between stiff and superstiff (according to Splat) to the quiver recently, results pending.

    Edit: The 190 Exploders aren't that hard to turn as commonly claimed IMO, just slightly shift some weight on the front ski.
    Last edited by Hicks; 12-12-2005 at 05:26 AM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    758
    Quote Originally Posted by NorgeViking
    I would get the stiff flex from what I have read about them. I am 5'11 and 180. I only ski in the West (Colo and Utah). I love open bowls and powder. I am starting to get into steeps and love crusing at speed. I am a good skier, but I am nowhere close to being as good as some of they guys on this board. I am probably a level 7 skier but that should change as I keep progressing. I would love to know how these would compare to my Volkl G4's? Are the stiffs gonna be a lot stiffer, or just marginally so?
    I was just wondering: With that nick (NorgeViking) I would assume you are from Norway. But skiing in colo and utah prolly means you live around there. Whats the scoop?
    All work and no play, ... you know...

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by KANUTTEN
    I was just wondering: With that nick (NorgeViking) I would assume you are from Norway. But skiing in colo and utah prolly means you live around there. Whats the scoop?
    Mom is Norwegian but I was born in the States (have dual citizenship).

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    norcal
    Posts
    272

    another confused soul

    i am also in a bit of analysis paralysis after reading through this site and others for weeks on end.

    the dilema is spreading, and i was looking at AK King Salmon and Nordica W105 in addition to the Explosiv and Bros.

    I'm a Tahoe skier - mainly Mt. Rose, most of the time off-piste, sometimes chasing a 5 year old on a groomer. 5'8" and a buck-fifty. been skiing the big blue tahoe for 30 years - everywhere.

    currently on AK no ka oi but on those east bowl dumps at rose, i'd like a fatter board.

    any takers? thanks.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Incline Village, NV (Tahoe)
    Posts
    5,438
    Quote Originally Posted by ansel4powsident
    east bowl dumps at rose, i'd like a fatter board.

    any takers? thanks.
    Go fatter for the powder days at Rose. I have the Explosiv and many other skis. I'd suggest K2 Maden, Volkl Sumo, etc.
    Every man dies. Not every man lives.
    You don’t stop playing because you grow old; you grow old because you stop playing.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    norcal
    Posts
    272

    fatter than a bro?

    hey jim s.

    thanks for the idea about sumos...i guess gotama works as well....

    is the bro not a big difference from the no ka oi? is that why you say go fatter than the salmons or explosivs, etc.?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Øøøtahhh
    Posts
    2,780
    Quote Originally Posted by ansel4powsident
    currently on AK no ka oi but on those east bowl dumps at rose, i'd like a fatter board.

    any takers? thanks.
    What do you mean by this? Are you offering them for sale? I've already bought enough skis this year but if the price is right I prolly couldn't resist a second pair of NKO's.

    Expect a PM.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Haxorland
    Posts
    7,102
    I had G4's and killed them, bought explosivs and soft bros. Perfect quiver setup for me. Stiffer explosivs for crud busting, icy days, or mach stupid speed, soft bros for pow, corn, trees and hikes. When I demoed the stiff bros, I felt they were very like my explosives; too similar to warrant ordering the stiffs, so I went soft.

    My answer in short, both
    I've concluded that DJSapp was never DJSapp, and Not DJSapp is also not DJSapp, so that means he's telling the truth now and he was lying before.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    758
    Quote Originally Posted by DJSapp
    I had G4's and killed them, bought explosivs and soft bros. Perfect quiver setup for me. Stiffer explosivs for crud busting, icy days, or mach stupid speed, soft bros for pow, corn, trees and hikes. When I demoed the stiff bros, I felt they were very like my explosives; too similar to warrant ordering the stiffs, so I went soft.

    My answer in short, both
    Sorry for hijack and repetetiveness - soft bro flex question;

    I ordered one of those on behalf of a friend who is a pretty good and strong telemarker (like 85 kg). But as he probably skis not more than 20 days a season I thought the soft bro's would be enough ski and more fun for him than a pair of those stiffies. Do you agree? What is the closest you can get to aspen softs flex - would it be similar to seth vicous, maybe, or possibly legend8800?
    All work and no play, ... you know...

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Haxorland
    Posts
    7,102
    Quote Originally Posted by KANUTTEN
    Sorry for hijack and repetetiveness - soft bro flex question;

    I ordered one of those on behalf of a friend who is a pretty good and strong telemarker (like 85 kg). But as he probably skis not more than 20 days a season I thought the soft bro's would be enough ski and more fun for him than a pair of those stiffies. Do you agree? What is the closest you can get to aspen softs flex - would it be similar to seth vicous, maybe, or possibly legend8800?
    Mine are the fir softs, so I don't know how much difference there is between the cores. The flex feels similar to a seth pistol if I remember correctly (it's been a while since I've fondled a bunch of skis in a shop). The softs really like to turn in tight places and can rail fairly well, but they're not as fast as the stiffs. The stiffs felt a lot like my 190 explosivs, which I consider a great ski for a one ski quiver.

    I've only felt uncomfortable twice on my soft bros and wished I had a stiffer ski, once in pow that turned into cement (love that socal snow), and once going mach stupid on icy death cookies. Other than that, I'll use them every day unless coverage is sketchy. I think your friend will be happy either way.
    I've concluded that DJSapp was never DJSapp, and Not DJSapp is also not DJSapp, so that means he's telling the truth now and he was lying before.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    4,956

    Post

    It's just me but I'd do Explosives and soft Bros.

    It'll be a couple more years before I can justify spending $$$ on some soft bros to mount my Rossi 140s to.
    Balls Deep in the 'Ho

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    659
    just get the bros.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by seatosky
    just get the bros.
    If I went with the Bro's it would have to be the stiffs. I can't afford both the Explosivs and the soft Bro's.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •