Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 52

Thread: Physics has a purpose

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    West si-ide
    Posts
    242

    Physics has a purpose

    I was bored, so this is how fast a 160 # person is going after dropping a 200 foot cliff. Mind you there is no air resistance, and the initial velocity vertical equals zero.

    77.32 miles an hour, or 113.4 feet per second

    Time in the air is 3.5 seconds.

    Maybe I will learn impact force soon...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    People's Republic of Shitshow
    Posts
    7,581
    Quote Originally Posted by Catbert
    I was bored, so this is how fast a 160 # person is going after dropping a 200 foot cliff. Mind you there is no air resistance, and the initial velocity vertical equals zero.

    77.32 miles an hour, or 113.4 feet per second

    Time in the air is 3.5 seconds.

    Maybe I will learn impact force soon...

    so if youre on spats thats like 12 seconds of hang time?


    sweet...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Puget Sound
    Posts
    184
    Quote Originally Posted by Catbert
    I was bored, so this is how fast a 160 # person is going after dropping a 200 foot cliff. Mind you there is no air resistance, and the initial velocity vertical equals zero.

    77.32 miles an hour, or 113.4 feet per second

    Time in the air is 3.5 seconds.

    Maybe I will learn impact force soon...
    The 160 lb weight is a given for Earth, but normally you'll work physics calculations in terms of mass because mass is constant regardless of the force of gravity, where as weight is a product of gravity's effect on a mass.

    Physics was my favorite class in HS. Projectile motion, circular motion, waves. So cool.
    -Thomas

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Maple Syrup and Lumberjacks, eigh.
    Posts
    4,289
    I liked physics in highschool because it was nice and quiet and I could sleep and play games on my graphing calculator. I could also drool on my desk while doing either of the aforementioned and no one would notice.

    Then in college it got hard all of a sudden and made me drink.

    Now I'm finishing up in trade school. Piss on physics. I'll let the laws act on me without complaint or question.
    ::.:..::::.::.:.::..::.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    the wasteland
    Posts
    3,181
    Time for you to learn some more physics. If you don't count air resistance, the mass (or weight for that matter) is irrelevant.
    You see, in this world there's two kinds of people, my friend: Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    West si-ide
    Posts
    242
    Quote Originally Posted by AKBckntry
    The 160 lb weight is a given for Earth, but normally you'll work physics calculations in terms of mass because mass is constant regardless of the force of gravity, where as weight is a product of gravity's effect on a mass.

    Physics was my favorite class in HS. Projectile motion, circular motion, waves. So cool.
    I changed the 160 Pounds to 72.6 kg... and rune, lets pretend we are in a vacuum.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    the wasteland
    Posts
    3,181
    You didn't understand my comment. In a vacuum, the mass is irrelevant.
    You see, in this world there's two kinds of people, my friend: Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    CH
    Posts
    1,511
    Quote Originally Posted by Catbert
    I changed the 160 Pounds to 72.6 kg... and rune, lets pretend we are in a vacuum.

    Quote Originally Posted by runethechamp
    Time for you to learn some more physics. If you don't count air resistance, the mass (or weight for that matter) is irrelevant.
    Umm, what part of irrelevant don't you understand?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    West si-ide
    Posts
    242
    Whoa... How does that work? I am just in intro, not AP or anything.
    [Edit]: I am an idiot. It is just accelerating by -9.8, just AT. the mass serves no purpose.
    Last edited by Catbert; 12-08-2005 at 11:09 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    the wasteland
    Posts
    3,181
    speed is acceleration integrated over time. distance is speed integrated over time. That pretty much sums it up.

    OK, some more, with improvised symbols:

    speed = int(g,0,t) = g*t+constant. Speed=0 at t=0 => constant = 0
    distance = int(speed,0,t) = int(g*t,0,t) = 0.5*g*t^2+constant, distance=0 at t=0 => constant = 0
    if you know the distance, t=sqrt(2*distance/g) and v = sqrt(2*g*distance)

    Time for Ogre to step in I think....
    Last edited by runethechamp; 12-08-2005 at 11:14 PM.
    You see, in this world there's two kinds of people, my friend: Those with loaded guns and those who dig. You dig.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Maple Syrup and Lumberjacks, eigh.
    Posts
    4,289
    Gravity is a constant force and will act the same on any object on earth. If there is no resistance to counter the force of gravity (ie in a vacuum) you'll fall just as fast as a bigrig or a penny.

    in other words, Newtons 2nd law.
    ::.:..::::.::.:.::..::.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    CH
    Posts
    1,511
    or you can use kinetics instead of kinematics and say:
    1/2 mv^2 = mgh
    1/2 v^2 = gh
    v^2 = 2gh
    v = (2gh)^.5

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Banff
    Posts
    22,524
    where is the orge when you really need him ?




    kinda cool really ...

  14. #14
    Ogre's Avatar
    Ogre is offline I don't like...nNNERRRDS!
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    202

    Angry

    THIS ENTIRRRRE THRRRRREAD IS

    PISSING ME OFF!!!!

    GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!


    nnnNNNNNERRRRRRDDDDS!!!!

    POCKET-PRRRRROTECTORRRRRRRS!!!!

    GEEKS!!!!

    NO NERDS! NO NERDS! NO NERDS! NO NERDS!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Snoqualmie
    Posts
    1,298
    Terminal velocity calculations here: http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/s...minal+velocity

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sandy Eggo
    Posts
    1,182
    I rewrote Matlab, including state-space manipulations, on my abacus.

    I do numerical integrals in my head for fun.

    I can stabilize any system, and place poles at will.

    I can travel faster than light.

    Einstein forgot to include the Theory of Relativity as it Relates to Sphinx.


  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Leysin, Switzerland
    Posts
    1,262
    Quote Originally Posted by Catbert
    Whoa... How does that work? I am just in intro, not AP or anything.
    [Edit]: I am an idiot. It is just accelerating by -9.8, just AT. the mass serves no purpose.
    Galileo would agree.
    The big stone and the small stone hit the ground at the same time
    when dropped from the Tower of Pisa.

    Mass or weight play no role.
    Density does, but that requires consideration of air resistance.

    Now then, a complete understanding of this requires Isaac Newton and his Calculus.

    If you have not learned about integrals and derivatives, well, all I can say is,
    that's what they are all about. Plus a good many other things.
    Absolute genius he was!
    Ski, Bike, Climb.
    Resistence is futile.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Puget Sound
    Posts
    184
    Quote Originally Posted by runethechamp
    Time for you to learn some more physics. If you don't count air resistance, the mass (or weight for that matter) is irrelevant.
    Of course, but in elementary physics air resistance is not considered.

    We did learn the properties of matter and energy in a vacuum, including the awesome experiment with the buzzer in the vacuum.

    I'll bet those Star Wars geeks wouldn't have enjoyed their flicks so much if physics had played a larger role, i.e. the lack of sound in the vacuum of space. Same goes for Star Trek and others.
    Last edited by AKBckntry; 12-09-2005 at 01:09 AM.
    -Thomas

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Puget Sound
    Posts
    184
    Quote Originally Posted by Ogre
    THIS ENTIRRRRE THRRRRREAD IS

    PISSING ME OFF!!!!

    GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!


    nnnNNNNNERRRRRRDDDDS!!!!

    POCKET-PRRRRROTECTORRRRRRRS!!!!

    GEEKS!!!!

    Ogre becomes a nerd in "Nerds in Paradise", does he not?
    -Thomas

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Leysin, Switzerland
    Posts
    1,262
    And you should also consider an important question:
    Where would you land hucking that cliff with a given velocity?

    For this, one can use vectors. Trig might work, but with Calculus. Me need to think this over.
    What's your vector Victor? Roger Roger.
    Ski, Bike, Climb.
    Resistence is futile.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    In Your Wife
    Posts
    8,288
    Saying you keep it simple and only calculate the vertical component of said skier's speed, you'd still have to factor air resistence to get a number that is even remotely accurate. There is a massive amount of air resistence on a person over the course of a 200 foot fall, enough to make the numbers change a lot. Also, as it's been said above, in a vaccuum, mass is irrelevant.

    Obviously, if you add vectors, things get trickier.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Leysin, Switzerland
    Posts
    1,262
    Quote Originally Posted by glademaster
    Also, as it's been said above, in a vaccuum, mass is irrelevant.
    To clarify, mass is irrelevant. Period.

    When air resistance applies, it is density, not mass, that matters.
    Think of a ping pong ball versus a rock of same size.
    Think of a basketball and rock of same mass.
    Think density!
    Ski, Bike, Climb.
    Resistence is futile.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    YetiMan
    Posts
    13,368
    What if the verticle component of skier's speed prior to takeoff and the air resistance cancel? Is that even possible?

  24. #24
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Yes Please
    Posts
    1,107
    I need a shit. If I produce a man size two piece with a gratifying release resulting from the injestion of 0.5 tonnes of chinese take away (with prawn toasts) the night before, digestion period 8 hours, at what speed will the shit with a water content of 0.2cm3 per acre, hit the water in the toilet bowl? For a bonus mark - if my education was paid for, should I feel bad that I don't understand what the fuck you are all talking about?
    Not around much these days.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Yes Please
    Posts
    1,107
    Too slow.

    The correct answer was a dissapointing 1minute 3 seconds. The first fell clean and took less than a second, the next went off course and hit the porcelain. It took the completion of the front page of the sports section before it hit the desired destination. The devation was likely caused by a mega tonne methane explosion at the point of release resulting from the Guiness swilled down with the take away. Either way, the experiment was completed and completed well.

    yes..I washed my hands after.
    Not around much these days.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •