Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 49

Thread: Where does one post stupid Noob Jong questions asking why everyone trashes the PR?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Aspen, CO
    Posts
    540

    Where does one post stupid Noob Jong questions asking why everyone trashes the PR?

    I suppose I could ask over at EpicSki and avoid flames, but life is short and I might as well ask the best...
    I used some Pocket Rockets last season about 5 times and enjoyed them. It was my first season out West and while learning how to ski powder through the trees the PRs gave me confidence in that they were so easy to turn. I was looking at getting some 1080 Guns this year but started reading this forum about a month ago. Then, after reading some more, the Metron started sounding good. But alas, the Metron is deemed "heavy." So, is the main defect of the PR/1080 Gun the "noodle" factor?
    I used Apache Chiefs on Highlands Bowl, and thought they were good for floating, but compared to the PR they took longer to get around. I used some Big Stix on another day at Highlands, and actually enjoyed them, but liked the weight of the PR.
    6 feet, 200lbs, 10 year east coast skier, one season Aspen/Snowmass skier, ready for season two, trying to decide which ski to buy...
    Any advice would be appreciated...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Too Far South
    Posts
    5,269
    Use the search function JONG!

    and thats the bottom line, cause laseranimal said so
    For sure, you have to be lost to find a place that can't be found, elseways everyone would know where it was

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    6,194
    Yes, Pocket Rockets are noodles. Slow speeds? they're great. Float well, easy to turn.

    Most people here don't ski slow and don't really care about easy. They're hard chargin, line ripping ski junkies.

    Metrons are like gold over at Epic. If you want to ski groomers or like the resort hotels as much as the terrain then thats the place to be and they'll have good suggestions for you.

    edit your post and say that you've ordered some Soft Bro's.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    the ether
    Posts
    6,389

    Lightbulb Da Troof.

    More maggots then you think have a soft spot for Pocket Rockets. And they rip the shit outta stuff on em. Yes they are way soft, yes the longest they come is a 185(which im sure skis like a 170), but if you liked em, and found em easy to ski and fun, then get em.

    My only advice is that you should demo some bigger stiffer skis first. If this was the only ski you tried, you are missing out and maybe making a bad decision. In your situation, try some out some stiffer sticks. B3s, Seths, Sugars. It's the skier, not the ski. So ride whatever you want, just make sure you charge on em.
    Drive slow, homie.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Aspen, CO
    Posts
    540
    thanks for the fast replies...

    What length pocket rocket were you on?
    I was on 175s.

    My only advice is that you should demo some bigger stiffer skis first.
    I did use some Apache Chiefs and some Big Stix. Both of which I had good days on, but I kept thinking while I was using them "The PR was easier to turn on."

    In your situation, try some out some stiffer sticks. B3s, Seths, Sugars. It's the skier, not the ski. So ride whatever you want, just make sure you charge on em.
    Will do. I'll see what they've got and try some things out. One of the benefits of working in a tune shop is a plethora of skis to choose from.

    Thanks again for the replies, looking forward to opening day just 11 days away...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    utah
    Posts
    4,647
    Yep. They're soft, but if you liked skiing on them, then you should get them. Maybe you'll decide to go with stiffer skis later, maybe not.

    Everything I've read about Metrons is that they're heavy and weird - you'll love them or hate them so there's no way you should get those unless you've tried them.

    At your size you could probably be better off on the 185s, so you might want to demo those if you get a chance.
    "Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "Wow, what a Ride!"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Green River, WY
    Posts
    1,080
    do yourself a favor and atleast demo 185 PR's....do not get shorter than 185 if your that heavy. Kick ass tree and bump ski, sucks at speed, but kick ass tree ski. Running length on my 185's is only slightly longer than my sisters 173 volkl V3's...

    I'm 190lbs, mounted 1cm back and my tips dive at speed unless i lean back considerably

    I have a pair of 185s that have seen about 60 days, the top sheets are marked up but they only have been stone ground and tuned once and have lots of base left. The construction of the ski is actually pretty bomber, but the flex really goes floppy after about 30 days. Really really good bump ski too for it's width and flex...atleast for me.
    Last edited by LaramieSkiBum; 11-13-2005 at 09:57 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Jack Tone Road
    Posts
    12,735
    Quote Originally Posted by StoneCold
    I used Apache Chiefs on Highlands Bowl, and thought they were good for floating, but compared to the PR they took longer to get around.
    Wait, you skied Highlands Bowl on a floatable day and made more than 6 turns?

    There's your problem right there.
    Last edited by Steven S. Dallas; 11-13-2005 at 09:56 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    I like PRs - comes out of closet. Heck I have a used pair from Mike D.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    utah
    Posts
    4,647
    I'm not saying that they would be my ski of choice for really fast skiing - but oddly enough, when we went up to Snowbird and Endless had his radar gun - the person who clocked in the fastest was on PRs. FWIW. So it's not like it's impossible to go fast on them. There are certainly skis that will be much more stable at speed, but if they feel good for the majority of the skiing you're doing, that's what you want.
    "Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "Wow, what a Ride!"

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    The Leper Colony
    Posts
    3,460
    I liked my Pocket Rockets until they turned to pudding around day 30.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    572
    not to bag on the guy, but does anyone else think it's funny/scary that he works in a shop and doesn't know this stuff?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    7,628
    Quote Originally Posted by slim
    I liked my Pocket Rockets until they turned to pudding around day 30.
    You don't like pudding?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    just left the ATM
    Posts
    715
    I liked the pocket rockets until they took the blue robots off of them.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Aspen, CO
    Posts
    540
    not to bag on the guy, but does anyone else think it's funny/scary that he works in a shop and doesn't know this stuff?
    unfortunately it is 99% snowboards but i should be able to "demo" some skis from the rental shop guys.

    good advice all around. i think i will do the most simple thing, and try a bunch of skis and then purchase the ones i like the best. rocket science.
    Last edited by StoneCold; 11-14-2005 at 12:06 AM.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Huh?
    Posts
    10,908
    Quote Originally Posted by Tyrone Shoelaces
    You don't like pudding?
    He only likes the chocolate kind.
    "I knew in an instant that the three dollars I had spent on wine would not go to waste."

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    2,352
    One thing to keep in mind is that alot of us buy our skis keeping in mind the type of skier we want to be - i.e. I overbuy a ski for my skill level/charging and then "grow into them" as I improve. So I bought Legend Pros, which, when I get lazy, completely kick my ass and don't turn. They force me to put out as much as I can all the time (by all the time I obviously don't include groomers) and that's made me a much better skier. So while the PRs may be perfect for you now, it's likely that'll you improve more quickly if you put yourself on a stick that challenges you more. On the other hand, if you're willing to trade sticks around, you'd prolly be fine either way.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    lost in the network
    Posts
    481
    at your size i'd avoid foam cores. you can put a lot of torque on a ski if you are that big and a charger, foam cores do not like that and thier life span can be noticably shorter. other than that i just think that they are too soft, thats why old people like them, it makes them super easy to ski. get the gun lab if you want a salomon powder ski. its overpriced but its actually a decent ski.
    If you open a second beer and don't miss a beat between sips, is that two beers or just one 24 ouncer? -Tye 1on

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,707
    200lbs on a 175 PR?!?!?! There's something wrong here right? Seriously if you like it, do it. I HATE PRs. The worst ski I've ever skiied and horribly constructed. I like Scratches and they're the same size/shape and made stronger (but still break A LOT) and are more fun IMO. But Jamie Pierre does some "hard charging" on them so.... Whatever rocks yer bottle.

  20. #20
    bklyn is offline who guards the guardians?
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,762
    I have a friend who rips on the PR but she is also 5' 1" and 95 lbs.
    I tried them but instantly disliked them - 1 run and back to the demo truck.

    Try something else.
    I'm just a simple girl trying to make my way in the universe...
    I come up hard, baby but now I'm cool I didn't make it, sugar playin' by the rules
    If you know your history, then you would know where you coming from, then you wouldn't have to ask me, who the heck do I think I am.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Le Lavancher pour le weekend
    Posts
    3,337
    if it's soft and not too heavy i think they're def fun (only in a 185), but anything remotely hard and anything remotely mucky, forget it.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    758
    Fact: Chris Davenport was on regular PR's for almost 50% of the days last year or year before that. That is according to my recollection of himself writing on some ski website a while ago (i.e not 100% certain fact, but close). To me that means that the ski should be enough for a lot of people a lot of the time. The biggest disadvantage is durability in terms of flex; they are good for a short season.
    All work and no play, ... you know...

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    22,532
    If you weren't 200 pounds, I would understand your feelings.

    Big guys need stiffer than PR.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    572
    ^^^^^^^^^^
    What he said.

    Seriously, I'm 150 lbs and find pr's way Uber-nudle.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    none
    Posts
    8,901
    Stone Cold:

    These going to be your only ski?

    Are you only skiing Highlands or will you be skiing Aspen Mtn. too?

    Do you tune for D&E?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •