Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Freerides w/ Burly skis?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,041

    Freerides w/ Burly skis?

    Hypothetically speaking, let's say you have a non-rockstar skier with some burly skis (burly for me) - we'll say Legend Pros. Would freerides make them more difficult to ski in comparison to Axial 140s? I'm not talking about how freerides hold when dropping 30 footers or anything but will freerides make it noticeably more difficult to snap turns off on gnarly steeps?

    Trying to figure out if I'd be happier over the long haul mounting alpine and picking up something less demanding for touring...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    1,074
    I have them on V Mantras and skied them from March to June. Freerides have some play in them, but are comparable to a lot of downhill bindings. I assume you have seen Lou Dawsons reviews? http://www.wildsnow.com/ and http://www.wildsnow.com/backcountry-...-017-flex.html
    ________________________________________________
    If pigs had wings there'd be no bacon

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    33,932
    they'll add some riser compared to an alpine and have less ramp angle.

    I find they make it a little tougher the burlier the ski the bigger the difference - kind of narrows the sweet spot. But nothing that you can't get used to or mitigate with technique changes.

    Sure feels easier when you get back into Alpines though.
    Last edited by PNWbrit; 10-27-2005 at 05:52 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Downbound Train View Post
    And there will come a day when our ancestors look back...........

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sandy Eggo
    Posts
    1,182
    Don't Legend Pros weigh 12 pounds? That's a stupid ski to put AT bindings on.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,041
    Quote Originally Posted by Sphinx
    Don't Legend Pros weigh 12 pounds? That's a stupid ski to put AT bindings on.
    Play nice Sphinx!

    It's just what I have...
    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MEWN%3AIT&rd=1

    ...actually they need to be remounted anyway because the dude has them mounted about 3.5cm too far back - I'm def leaning toward mounting them alpine - but that means I need to pick up another ski for AT.

    btw - my BC jaunts will not be long distance touring but rather as little huffing as possible to get to decent terrain when the resorts suck.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,752
    Quote Originally Posted by Corky
    btw - my BC jaunts will not be long distance touring but rather as little huffing as possible to get to decent terrain when the resorts suck.
    Huffing = so hot right now.

    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Berkeley
    Posts
    1,255
    Quote Originally Posted by Cirquerider
    I have them on V Mantras and skied them from March to June. Freerides have some play in them, but are comparable to a lot of downhill bindings. I assume you have seen Lou Dawsons reviews? http://www.wildsnow.com/ and http://www.wildsnow.com/backcountry-...-017-flex.html
    great articles. (maybe I'm just an engineering geek)

    this was interesting:
    "What I found fascinating is that the Freeride and heavy duty Naxo Nx21 (formerly known as the "Stomp") were essentially equal to the Marker alpine binding..."

    and
    "Due to inherent error in any mechanical testing system, I'm confident in saying the Marker alpine, Freeride and Naxo Nx21 bindings are all essentially equal in lateral twisting stiffness..."

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    4,101
    If you do put on the axial 140's, watch if you plan on using trekkers, the heelpiece will interfere with the adapter in the flat position (no interference w/ the first climbing rung though).This is the same deal with the roto heels in the race bindings, though not as bad.
    If yer skin times are under an hour on average, I'd slap on an alpine binding.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    659
    Quote Originally Posted by trainnvain
    If you do put on the axial 140's, watch if you plan on using trekkers, the heelpiece will interfere with the adapter in the flat position (no interference w/ the first climbing rung though).This is the same deal with the roto heels in the race bindings, though not as bad.
    If yer skin times are under an hour on average, I'd slap on an alpine binding.
    I got told by a shop guy that you can grind off a bit of the plastic cover that goes over the 140/p14 heelpiece, and that gives it just enough room to put your heel all the way down. This is what I'm going to try.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    7,628
    Quote Originally Posted by Corky
    I'm not talking about how freerides hold when dropping 30 footers or anything but will freerides make it noticeably more difficult to snap turns off on gnarly steeps?
    I didn't notice any difference on my setup....I have Freerides mounted on Stockli DP's...and they ski great. I did however mount them w/o the rubber toe riser thingy for a little bit more ramp angle.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Jay, VT
    Posts
    743
    I've been on 186 Astroids with freerides for the last 3 years. I did notice a difference the first couple of days but quickly got used to it. I think it helped that I have never skied this ski with alpine bindings. And whats with all this about weight? Yea the stocklis may weigh more than some foam core dynafits but I'm not trying to win a race. Can you really feel that big of a difference? Sure it looks significant on paper but I don't think it really matters. I tour for turns only. I know that some people like to skin all friggin day for one run(euros) and then weight would be more of an issue. If your gear is 'heavey' you just have to be in better shape thats all. Sheesh
    Okay, ranting is over. Goodbye

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    333
    If you're thinking about Legend Pros and trekkers, you'll probably be disappointed. Since the alpine setup is very stiff torsionally, you'll experience a lot of torsional compliance in the trekkers themselves. This is especially pronouced if you skin across the fall line on a wind-packed surface-an excessive amount of knee angulation will be required to overcome the twisting in the trekker and allow you to set a ski on edge.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Aspen
    Posts
    9,565
    Squirrel99 has Freerides on Legend Pros. I've skied his pair a couple times and I didn't notice anything too different with that combination.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    22,532
    Ski them as-is and find out wheter 1) you like freerides and 2) you like 3.5cm back.
    WHy not try an exisiting setup whenever possible.
    That real world feedback is better than anything we can tell you.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,041
    Thanks for all the help...

    Quote Originally Posted by Core Shot
    Ski them as-is and find out wheter 1) you like freerides and 2) you like 3.5cm back.
    WHy not try an exisiting setup whenever possible.
    That real world feedback is better than anything we can tell you.
    I thought about that - I just think they are so far back that it'll be too weird to tell.

    From all of your insight I've come to the conclusion that they'll probably ski close enough with freerides that it won't make a difference....

    ...BUT...I think that I still may want a less demanding ski for the BC simply because of how crappy I ski when I've just humped uphill for a couple hours - not to mention, out there I won't get a few runs to dial myself in...and since the LPs have to be remounted anyway...

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Eagle, CO
    Posts
    2,277
    Quote Originally Posted by Corky
    ...BUT...I think that I still may want a less demanding ski for the BC simply ...
    For me this is a much bigger factor then half a millimeter of play that the Freeride might or might not have.

    Want to buy a 2003-04 Aromic R:EX? Super light stable BC ski.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    22,532
    Quote Originally Posted by Corky
    Thanks for all the help...

    I thought about that - I just think they are so far back that it'll be too weird to tell.

    From all of your insight I've come to the conclusion that they'll probably ski close enough with freerides that it won't make a difference....

    ...BUT...I think that I still may want a less demanding ski for the BC simply because of how crappy I ski when I've just humped uphill for a couple hours - not to mention, out there I won't get a few runs to dial myself in...and since the LPs have to be remounted anyway...
    I still say take the free sample.
    Bring them to the mounatin and ski em to see where you want the next mount to be. Freeride will be a bit different, particularly due to ramp angle, but you can learn a lot about how the midpoint is in varying terrain.

    Backcountry depends on what you weigh. I dont consider LP demanding, but I weigh 215. In fact, I had a R-Ex backcountry ski that was more demanding since it had more sidecut.
    Also, the LPs (narrow 194s) that I mounted with freerides were too forward, so for a pow backcountry ski, your 3.5 back may not be as weird as you think.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    758
    Quote Originally Posted by Corky
    Thanks for all the help...

    I thought about that - I just think they are so far back that it'll be too weird to tell.

    From all of your insight I've come to the conclusion that they'll probably ski close enough with freerides that it won't make a difference....

    ...BUT...I think that I still may want a less demanding ski for the BC simply because of how crappy I ski when I've just humped uphill for a couple hours - not to mention, out there I won't get a few runs to dial myself in...and since the LPs have to be remounted anyway...
    3.5cm backmounting;
    Be aware that the Dynastar Legends have the recommended mountingplace 2-4 cm further to the front than for most "comparable" skis. Personnally I found the recommended mounting place weird; Tendency for tips to dive, and very narrow sweet spot in powder. So I would strongly suggest trying out the current mount.

    Legend Pros with freerides is kind of a strange set up as they are about as heavy as you can get a ski of that size. If you are sure that is the only pair you will ski, then I think freerides will work just fine. However, the hole point with such a bomber ski is to be able to ski a bit brutal in sketchy conditions. I just don't feel so confident on the freerides if I want to ski that way. That is probably just in my head, but anyway. The elevation in the freerides actually makes the ski easier to get up on the edge. But the play makes it feel not so burly, imo.

    So if you can afford a dedicated backcountry ski, that would be the best.
    All work and no play, ... you know...

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    utah
    Posts
    4,647
    I didn't like the way Fritchis felt in non-pow conditions. I didn't mess with the shims and all that, so maybe that would have helped. But I don't think I'd want them on my everyday skis. And LP's don't make a lot of sense to me as a BC ski.

    I'd test them out as is, remount if necessary, and see what you can find at swaps to find a better BC ski or just use trekkers in the meantime if you're not going touring much.
    "Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "Wow, what a Ride!"

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,041
    Thanks for all the great advice! So I've decided to ski them as is and see how they feel and go from there. If I have to remount I will mount them alpine and find something else to use for touring. The skis are mounted at 30" (76.2cm) from the tail which is REALLY far back - I think the 79.5 number thrown around looks to be not too far forward - trying them as is will hopefully give me some feedback.

    Anyway, I have an unmounted REX sitting around that I can use with the freerides - or even better maybe my Blizzard rep buddy will help with some Titan 9.2s real cheap...I guess it's not a bad thing to have my options...

    Thanks again!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •