More to it than a damper bud. Both you and Toast seem to have the theory down, but are having a hard time conceptualizing the role leverage plays in a coil setup. Here, I’ll give you another example. If ‘all DH and big enduro bikes are setup progressive, so that’s all that matters,’ then why did big ol 200 lb Richie Rude design his own 170/160 enduro rig with a low leverage ratio, and a relatively low linear progression? Sure, he doesn’t run it with a coil often, but it also means he needs less air (more available), which in turn means he needs less tokens to control the end stroke, and naturally there’s more mid stroke. There are a few high level riders in the sea to Sky who do run their low leverage, linearly progressive yetis coiled, and you couldn’t get em to ride anything else. You simply can’t analyze a bikes kinematic w/o looking at both, unless you’re an average size or skill level, then you’re riding at speeds and weights that most bike companies target in their designs, which means you’re also probably getting all your kinematic info in the PB commentsTalking about this is like trying to have a conversation with a boomer bellied up to the bar about his preferred reach, and how Pythagoras, and his understudy Lee, should be tarred and feathered.
Oh, and please, next time vote for science. You and Toast are starting to sound like RFK and the gang
Thanks for your time today Gents; I needed a win, the losses were piling upAppreciate ya!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bookmarks