Check Out Our Shop
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 169

Thread: Do you detune? Why or why not?

  1. #76
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    monument
    Posts
    7,462
    Quote Originally Posted by Shorty_J View Post
    You have some HL skis right?

    They are definitely detuned.

    Sent from my Pixel 8 using Tapatalk
    Hmm, fair enough, his tunes are sublime.
    By far the best I have skied.
    But his edges (even if detuned) are still quite sharp to the touch tip to tail.

  2. #77
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,262
    HL skis are progressive bevel. (per Marshall) Skis have 1.5° bevel at tip and tail. Polished, but full sharp. Detune is up to end user. It's in post #24 in the 50/50 thread

  3. #78
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    15,874
    Musty starts a thread to wiggle his Vienna sausage at everyone. Seeks validation that he’s a superior skier because he doesn’t need to detune even though WC skiers ski on de-tuned skis. That’s my take on this thread after reading it through. I don’t really care if he’s a better skier than me.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  4. #79
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,262
    Yeah!. There's 0 WC skiers skiing that tune that was posted

  5. #80
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    beaverhead county
    Posts
    5,708
    variable bevel is indeed the way.
    swing your fucking sword.

  6. #81
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    my own little world
    Posts
    6,247
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    Musty starts a thread to wiggle his Vienna sausage at everyone. Seeks validation that he’s a superior skier because he doesn’t need to detune even though WC skiers ski on de-tuned skis. That’s my take on this thread after reading it through. I don’t really care if he’s a better skier than me.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I mostly just suck at asking questions. But sure, you got me.

    The thing that sticks out to me is that I’m not better than you, almost certainly, yet my ski tuning preferences vary. Even just calling it a preference and leaving it there doesn’t really answer the question… most other characteristics we can talk about a bit more intelligently. Width, radius, taper, flex…. It all comes down to what we’re trying to do or idiosyncrasies with preferred terrain or turn shape or technique or background (racing, freeride, freestyle). Detuning tips and tails? I got nothin.
    focus.

  7. #82
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    my own little world
    Posts
    6,247
    Quote Originally Posted by Self Jupiter;[emoji[emoji6[emoji640
    [emoji638]][emoji640][emoji639]][emoji637][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji639]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji639]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji640]][emoji[emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]][emoji640][emoji6[emoji640][emoji638]]][emoji637]]No, it’s my ability to ski faster and with more aplomb that allows me to get some edge out of a more dull tune. Powerrrrrr

    And what LVS and Djongo said.
    That’s interesting… power and/or the ability to be able to apply more edge pressure? Perhaps I need sharp tips and tails to get any engagement at all, but those who can better modulate increased edge pressures also appreciate less engagement further out toward tips and tails?
    focus.

  8. #83
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    23,001
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowMachine View Post
    It's not the deburring.... It's the dragging them across rocks.

    Reading. You may be doing it wrong.
    I read it again. You wrote that deburring detunes your whole edge.
    That's a no from me, dawg.
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  9. #84
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    8,159
    Quote Originally Posted by Mustonen View Post
    That’s interesting… power and/or the ability to be able to apply more edge pressure? Perhaps I need sharp tips and tails to get any engagement at all, but those who can better modulate increased edge pressures also appreciate less engagement further out toward tips and tails?
    How’s your boot fit? Comfort? Performance? Race?

    How’s your cuff alignment?

    What type of boot? Race? Freeride? Cross-over AT? AT? 3 piece or overlap boot? Soft or stiff boot?

    Where do you ski? Colorado? Utah? Washington? Vermont?

    What kind of runs do you ski? How fast? How steep? Are there lots of trees, bumps, and variations in terrain that require quick adjustments?

    How tall? How heavy?

    Long or short tib/fib?

    Thin or thick calves?

    A lot of variables that could drive different preferences… and I didn’t even get in to different ski techniques…

  10. #85
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    15,874
    There it is, different strokes for different folks


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  11. #86
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    33,932
    no body has even talked about strokes of the file
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  12. #87
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    my own little world
    Posts
    6,247
    Quote Originally Posted by TAFKALVS;
    How’s your boot fit? Comfort? Performance? Race?

    How’s your cuff alignment?

    What type of boot? Race? Freeride? Cross-over AT? AT? Three piece or overlap boot? Soft or stiff boot?

    Where do you ski? Colorado? Utah? Washington? Vermont?

    What kind of runs do you ski? How fast? How steep? Are there lots of trees, bumps, and variations in terrain that require quick adjustments?

    How tall? How heavy?

    Long or short tib/fib?

    Thin or thick calves?

    A lot of variables that could drive different preferences… and I didn’t even get in to different ski techniques…
    Exactly! But do we have anything besides “magnets how do they work” on this? Do you think thin or thick calves actually impact somebody’s sensitivity to edge detuning?

    As an example, MO said something somewhere in re: mount point on rockered skis, and to find the balance point with more tip than tail rocker (Corvus) some might feel the need to move back, presumably because they balance further forward than others, whereas moving back on a ski with a more even camber profile will just put you behind that balance point, which is no bueno. Makes some sense and sheds a bit of light on sensitivity to mount point vis a vis camber and balance point outside of just the sidecut. You all probably already knew that, but got my old wheels a turnin’.

    While this stuff is complicated, man, with a lotta ins and a lotta outs and a lotta what have yous, there are some generalities we can usually pull out to focus our thinking on such things.

    So since you’ve apparently identified all the myriad complexities, TAKFALVS, care to opine on how any one or several might impact whether somebody prefers any particular level of detuning?
    focus.

  13. #88
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    8,159

    Do you detune? Why or why not?

    We all have unique biomechanics that impact how we tip a ski on edge it’s compounded by the gear upstream of the ski.

    I naturally pronate plus ski in 140 flex boots and am heavy and have thick calves (zero movement laterally in my boot cuff) and therefore can put an enormous amount of pressure on my inside edge with very little effort. I ski primarily off-piste in bumpy treed terrain with wet high density snow, and tend to ski more flat base with mostly subtle edge tipping movements to initiate my turns, with high edge angles only coming in to play immediately during and after the point my ski is in the fall line. I use a lot of tip pressure and rotary movement coming from femur rotation in my hip socket to drive a pivoted turn. I do not typically rely on the sidecut of ski much to make a turn.

    If on groomed terrain I’ll initiate a turn using more aggressive edge tipping movements and riding the edge of the skis but even then I put a lot of pressure on the ski to bend it in to an arc and I don’t need sharp edges to achieve that unless we’re talking about WROD ice conditions. I prefer to have a ski that I can feel like I can easily release from an arc at any given point.

    The skis I choose tend to be traditional mounts, 190cm in length, mid to high 20m turn radius, camber underfoot with modest rocker, a relatively long running length, and typically a damp, stiff construction with a high level of torsional grip inherently.

    I don’t gel with full reverse camber skis or overly rockered or soft skis, as I can over flex them easily and feel too much edge pressure underfoot, and I cannot press on the tips how I like.

    Long story short, I like to slide/drift as needed and don’t like feeling locked in to a turn.

  14. #89
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    170
    I learned about detuning about 15yrs ago when I bought Line Prophet 100s at one shop and bindings at another. The shop I bought the bindings at was reputed to have the best tech in town so I had the skis mounted there. He was the guy that did setups for the local racing scene. The first time I went out on the Prophets I thought I was going to kill myself, I kept catching an edge. I made my way down the hill and went back to the shop where I bought the skis. The tech there looked at the ski recognized it was a race tune and did a major detune on the shovel and tail, after that no problems at all. The Prophets were twin tips but not quite rockered. Ever since I detune from the contact point on all my skis.

  15. #90
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    First you need to clarify what you mean by detune. I aggressively round the edges of my skis on any part beyond the side cut and or the splayed part of the tips and tails. If the edge doesn’t contact the snow when on a groomer, hard or soft, there’s zero reason for it to be sharp. Old timer WC tuner Norm did this on the team skis. If there’s any soft snow, scraped off ice, loose granular on groomers the edge that doesn’t contact the firm snow will drag because of the square or acute angle sharp edges.

    I leave the edges on my firm snow skis sharp except for removing the burrs and rounding the part that doesn’t contact the firm snow. Soft snow skis get the same treatment on tips and tails and varying degrees of detune on the contact part of the sidecut.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    This is the way.

  16. #91
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    8,086
    Mustonen, have you ever skied the same skis on the same day detuned and not?

    Just wondering if it’s a “I’ve tried it and it’s not for me” situation or a ‘“I’m happy enough with the way my skis ski” situation.

    Or maybe an ‘I couldn’t tell the difference, so why worry about it situation’, but sounds like probably not that.

  17. #92
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    33,932
    OMG that ^^ sounds like back to back testing ?!
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  18. #93
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Alpental
    Posts
    6,677
    Quote Originally Posted by J. Barron DeJong View Post
    Mustonen, have you ever skied the same skis on the same day detuned and not?

    Just wondering if it’s a “I’ve tried it and it’s not for me” situation or a ‘“I’m happy enough with the way my skis ski” situation.

    Or maybe an ‘I couldn’t tell the difference, so why worry about it situation’, but sounds like probably not that.
    "I don't tune my skis, ergo I do not detune them nor like the feel when I detune my non-tuned skis"
    Move upside and let the man go through...

  19. #94
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    33,932
    Just call me phil but whether you sharpen tip to tail or never file for years on end,

    detune edges or not cuz you havent sharpened them in 5 yrs

    isnt failure to tune it also Tuning ?

    I seen a vid of some kids riding hand rails and they were detuning ski edges on a hand rail
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  20. #95
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    my own little world
    Posts
    6,247

    Do you detune? Why or why not?

    ….

    Same day, no. I’ve skied detuned skis that I bought used, and had to fix them. What?

    And yeah, I tune my skis regularly. I’ll usually touch up my edges with a fine diamond stone before I wax, at the very least, and I wax at least every other day I ski. Bit obsessive maybe. My shit is tack sharp.

    Also, though, what the fuck? I’m not questioning anybody’s manhood. Just trying to think about this particular aspect of ski performance and design and preference. I’m not the only one who doesn’t detune their skis. I’m just wondering what aspect, really, we are controlling for here.
    Last edited by Mustonen; 01-01-2025 at 10:20 PM.
    focus.

  21. #96
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    my own little world
    Posts
    6,247

    Do you detune? Why or why not?

    Quote Originally Posted by TAFKALVS View Post
    We all have unique biomechanics that impact how we tip a ski on edge it’s compounded by the gear upstream of the ski.

    I naturally pronate plus ski in 140 flex boots and am heavy and have thick calves (zero movement laterally in my boot cuff) and therefore can put an enormous amount of pressure on my inside edge with very little effort. I ski primarily off-piste in bumpy treed terrain with wet high density snow, and tend to ski more flat base with mostly subtle edge tipping movements to initiate my turns, with high edge angles only coming in to play immediately during and after the point my ski is in the fall line. I use a lot of tip pressure and rotary movement coming from femur rotation in my hip socket to drive a pivoted turn. I do not typically rely on the sidecut of ski much to make a turn.

    If on groomed terrain I’ll initiate a turn using more aggressive edge tipping movements and riding the edge of the skis but even then I put a lot of pressure on the ski to bend it in to an arc and I don’t need sharp edges to achieve that unless we’re talking about WROD ice conditions. I prefer to have a ski that I can feel like I can easily release from an arc at any given point.

    The skis I choose tend to be traditional mounts, 190cm in length, mid to high 20m turn radius, camber underfoot with modest rocker, a relatively long running length, and typically a damp, stiff construction with a high level of torsional grip inherently.

    I don’t gel with full reverse camber skis or overly rockered or soft skis, as I can over flex them easily and feel too much edge pressure underfoot, and I cannot press on the tips how I like.

    Long story short, I like to slide/drift as needed and don’t like feeling locked in to a turn.
    Everybody pronates. That’s just how you walk dude. Do you mean you over pronate? How does that figure in? (ETA: did some research and I suppose you mean your feet/ankles are pronated, or you stand on the insides of your feet. Makes sense. Didn’t mean to be overly literal.)

    Interesting other commentary, though, re: reverse camber and steering through the turn. I gel strongly with full reverse skis and have dailied them for years. Note that I do ski cambered skis too, but my tuning preference doesn’t change between them.

    Do you think the stiffness of the interface generally figures in, or do you suppose there is a canting issue afoot that you’re fighting with detuning? For reference, I’ve been blessed with a very neutral foot/ankle/knee structure (and neither over nor under pronate, though still not sure how that applies).

    ETA: this backs up Self Jupiter’s planetary levels of edge force he can apply as a factor. My own inside edging is not particularly strong, esp. compared to somebody with a race background or, I guess, flat feet. For reference I ski in s/max carbon 130 boots. Stiff for my lightish frame, but not a plug or true race boot. For further reference I don’t have a problem breaking into a drift whenever I want, put perhaps my range of edging motion skews further toward the outside edge than yours?

    I wonder if how evenly you can apply inside and outside edges factors in to this preference? I also wonder if those who learned to ski at a high level on straight skis might have more of a preference?
    Last edited by Mustonen; 01-02-2025 at 06:11 AM.
    focus.

  22. #97
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    8,086
    Quote Originally Posted by Mustonen View Post
    ….
    Also, though, what the fuck? I’m not questioning anybody’s manhood.
    Chillax, dude.

    I just thought that hearing how someone who’s decided never to detune arrived at that position could be informative to the ‘why or why not?’ question.

  23. #98
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    4,705
    Quote Originally Posted by Mustonen View Post
    ….

    I’m just wondering what aspect, really, we are controlling for here.

    Another way to think about it— If I’m skiing somewhat fast and/or in exposed terrain I’d rather struggle for edge grip in the moment vs deal with grabby tips or tails. Done a lot more tomahawking from the latter scenario.

  24. #99
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    15,874
    Some people just prefer looser skis is what it comes down to Musty. Just because you can’t feel it and don’t care for it doesn’t mean it’s right or wrong


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  25. #100
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    my own little world
    Posts
    6,247

    Do you detune? Why or why not?

    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn;
    Some people just prefer looser skis is what it comes down to Musty. Just because you can’t feel it and don’t care for it doesn’t mean it’s right or wrong


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Uh, yeah. Lots of people like lots of different things. Why are you so threatened by asking why, though? Who hurt you?

    Anyways…. This has been interesting to chew on. Curious if others have any thoughts on additional correlations/factors.
    focus.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •