Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Have survival rates changed over the past 4 decades?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sandy
    Posts
    5,374

    Have survival rates changed over the past 4 decades?

    Question Have survival rates, survival probability, and rescue probability for individuals critically buried by avalanche changed over the past 4 decades?

    Findings In this cohort study of 1643 individuals critically buried by avalanche in Switzerland comparing the period of winters beginning in 1981 to 1990 with those beginning 1981 to 2020, the total survival rate increased, the probability of survival if rescued within 10 minutes remained high but between 10 and 30 minutes decreased, survival after 130 minutes of burial improved, and median rescue time decreased.

    Meaning These results suggest that improved avalanche search-and-rescue techniques and advancements in medical treatment have been successful but the risk of early suffocation remains substantial.

    Paper here: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2824053
    When life gives you haters, make haterade.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    closer
    Posts
    6,121
    I'd really like to know whether the overall burial rate in % has changed with the near 90% rate of airbags around. Or are old school tourers (a lot more incidents per number of runs compared to freeriders and more likely to just have a normal pack...because the almighty weight ) still such a big percentage that this hasnt changed?

    I see that they only check burials, but I'dlike to see incidents survival rate. Because that should go up if the airbags work as intended.
    It's a war of the mind and we're armed to the teeth.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,843
    Thanks for sharing this study, super interesting to see high enough N counts and duration of observation to reach meaningful conclusions.
    Three fundamentals of every extreme skier, total disregard for personal saftey, amphetamines, and lots and lots of malt liquor......-jack handy

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    22,532
    The >130 minute makes no sense. They saySAR? So I guess back in the day you had an air pocket but no one got to you in time?

    I think that’s an anomaly
    Unless there are enough people full buried with airbags or avalungs. But I doubt it. Although footnotes 12 and 13 do reference other jama articles.
    But then again maybe there are enough naturally formed air pockets that you can be rescued after more than two hours? I guess it’s possible. But more likely it’s just sample size.

    Good read. And good news.
    Kill all the telemarkers
    But they’ll put us in jail if we kill all the telemarkers
    Telemarketers! Kill the telemarketers!
    Oh we can do that. We don’t even need a reason

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sandy
    Posts
    5,374
    Quote Originally Posted by Core Shot View Post
    The >130 minute makes no sense. They saySAR? So I guess back in the day you had an air pocket but no one got to you in time?

    I think that’s an anomaly
    Unless there are enough people full buried with airbags or avalungs. But I doubt it. Although footnotes 12 and 13 do reference other jama articles.
    But then again maybe there are enough naturally formed air pockets that you can be rescued after more than two hours? I guess it’s possible. But more likely it’s just sample size.

    Good read. And good news.
    Medical advancements play a big part , the Euros are dialed with treating hypothermia + an extensive SAR/ALS helicopter program to deliver it makes a difference.
    Things like AvaLife protocols, adoption of mechanical chest compression machines, HOPE/ECLS, etc. have made a positive difference.
    When life gives you haters, make haterade.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •