Check Out Our Shop
Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Anyone know anything about the 4frnt VCT's

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    46

    Anyone know anything about the 4frnt VCT's

    I was just wondering a few things about the VCT's that 4frnt makes, I am looking into getting some Volkl Gotama's or 4frnt VCT's. I cant find much information about the VCT's, I mean the dimensions are almost exact to the Gotamas, but I am wondering what the flex is like, what the weight is like, sidecut, and stuff to compare the two skis. I will most likely only be using these to ski bi powder days, or snowmobile days, I have a pair of scratch BC's that I will use on normal resort powder days, and AR5's for everything else. But I just want something that floats and is a little more stable on steeper deeper terrain than my scratchs. So right now its either the Gotama's or VCT's

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Iron Range
    Posts
    4,965
    Please excuse me while I dredge this thread up. Looks like no one answered poor FoShizzle about the VCT, so now that I'm in the market for a longer straighter wider pow ski though, and 6 months have passed since the start of this thread, perhaps some of you have demoed or put some laps on these boards and can offer some beta.

    From the description it looks like their characteristics change quite a bit as the lengths change. The 190 has a raised tail in lieu of the full twin, and is supposedly stiffer with a 31.5m turn radius. That's pretty straight.

    What have you 4FRNT owners found as far as durability on any of the 4FRNT skis?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Le Lavancher pour le weekend
    Posts
    3,337
    yeah i just happened to be looking at the specs on these and realized that they're a wider explosiv (120-95-112 +9 everywhere, the got is +5 everywhere). depending on stiffness, could maybe be a similar ski only wider?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    248
    I've only hand flexed the 190 VCT but it seemed to be a bit stiffer than a Gotama. Surprisingly light too.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    278
    As far as 4frnt durability, my first gen. 180 MSP's are still holding up great. Hoping to snag the 187's next year.
    "Hurry up and finish your wine so we can go get us some milkshakes"

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    551
    I posted a review of next years 182 VCT, do a search for that. As far as durability goes, I have the first gen 187 MSP and they're still holding up great.
    Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Iron Range
    Posts
    4,965
    I searched for "4FRNT VCT*" and got 4 resulting threads, none a review. Would you mind linking that, '78? Thanks. The vBulletin search function isn't so great with 3-character search strings.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,739
    Quote Originally Posted by bio-smear
    I searched for "4FRNT VCT*" and got 4 resulting threads, none a review. Would you mind linking that, '78? Thanks. The vBulletin search function isn't so great with 3-character search strings.
    Hey, my "search function thread for JONGS" got un-stickyed...

    Anyway, read and learn:
    http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/s...google+toolbar
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Iron Range
    Posts
    4,965
    Ahh, cool Chup. I hadn't thought of that. So I just formulated a Google search of:
    4FRNT VCT site:tetongravity.com/forums

    Only 2 results. Different than the results I got with the vBulletin search, but equally unhelpful.

    I called ProctorJones and they had 1 pair of 190's left for $400, so I pull the trig. Then, I'll write my own review, suckas!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    551
    Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Vancouver BC
    Posts
    3,296
    Isn't next years 190 EHP the same as this years 190 VCT? And the VCT will only come up to 182 or 185 something next year? Could be wrong but that's what I remember reading. And the 193 EHP will be slightly bigger than the 190.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    551
    190 EHP is this year's 190 VCT but with a more turned down tail. VCT is only coming out in 175 and 182 next season. 193 EHP is quick a lot bigger then the 190 (112 vs 104 underfoot).
    Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oaksterdam
    Posts
    1,402
    Quote Originally Posted by skier0178
    190 EHP is this year's 190 VCT but with a more turned down tail. VCT is only coming out in 175 and 182 next season. 193 EHP is quick a lot bigger then the 190 (112 vs 104 underfoot).
    Not to mention it has the megacore which is the full length thick heavy maple that they use in the Supermodel. Think MSP Supermodel but 193cm and 112mm underfoot it is an effing beast. Think B-Squad flex in a Sanouk minus the swallow tail My buddy flexed it at SIA and he couldn't beleive it. A true TGR ski.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Iron Range
    Posts
    4,965
    According to the site, the 190 is stiffer than the shorter sizes, and has a half-twin. I'm thinking it's probably like the Jak/Mothership 190 which had a much less pronounced twin. They're on the way, so I'll snap a photo when they arrive.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    906
    i'm considering getting the 182 VCT instead of next years 183 gotama for my everyday ski.

    i read his review, and it sounds like a good choice.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    THOR-Foothills
    Posts
    6,050
    Sorry for pulling this thread back to life

    Hey bio-smear, how did you like the 190 VCT? I can't find a review by someone who has skied it or can compare it to anything else.

    I'm thinking aboot getting a VCT/EHP 190 and would likr to hear some info on it before I buy another ski without knowing more aboot it.

    I bought my 192 999's without talking to anyone and after I drilled them, found out they skied better mounted rearward. Now I have two sets of holes in my 999s. Don't want to make that mistake again.
    It doesn't matter if you're a king or a little street sweeper...
    ...sooner or later you'll dance with the reaper
    -Death

    Quote Originally Posted by St. Jerry View Post
    The other morning I was awoken to "Daddy, my fart fell on the floor"
    Kaz is my co-pilot

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Iron Range
    Posts
    4,965
    This thread is pretty accurate:
    http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/s...ad.php?t=71595

    But I will add that, according to 4FRNT, the 190cm VCT/EHP is stiffer than its little brother, and I think the turn radius is slighly longer too. My impressions echo that of ptavv though. If you have to open up the 182 to let it shine, the same is true, if not more so for the 190. It likes speed in the deep or whatever.

    -1cm from the marked "freeride" line feels nice to me. No tip dive, but they feel responsive and I can stay neutral easily. I'll measure an absolute value from the tail later on and edit. The twin tail is a half-twin, not nearly as tall as the 182.

    Edges of the topsheets are brittle on the '05/06 if you tend to ski with your knees close together, but ptavv had no prob cuz he wrings them out like a GS ski.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Close, but not close enough
    Posts
    1,757
    I've put a few days on my 190 EHPs, resort pow, crud and a couple days in a cat. So far - so good.
    Stayed with the factory mount and haven't found any negatives. Seem to ski their full length at speed in pow and crud, but are also super quick to toss around in the trees. I'm not a big huck guy, but they provide a nice landing platform for the little 10-12' airs I've taken them off of.
    I suck at the whole review thing, but I can try and answer any questions you've got on them.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    THOR-Foothills
    Posts
    6,050
    What else do you ski on? What can you compare them to? How do they hold up in heavy crud? On the hardpack? Where do you ski?

    I hesitated on buying a pair over the summer and missed them, and am kinda kicking myself. Should I get these? Or just run my 999's?
    It doesn't matter if you're a king or a little street sweeper...
    ...sooner or later you'll dance with the reaper
    -Death

    Quote Originally Posted by St. Jerry View Post
    The other morning I was awoken to "Daddy, my fart fell on the floor"
    Kaz is my co-pilot

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    22
    here is a good one, not going to check if its already been posted http://72.3.192.161/forums/showthread.php?t=69251

    Im happy with mine (black 190) except the base seems a little soft + thin, and a little topshet de-lam at the tail. they're a little stiffer than (black) Gots, this years ehp 190 is a good bit stiffer than mine.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •