Ahh the benevolent Israelis!
https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/...n-territories/
One can and should condemn Hamas for these atrocities but don’t gloss over how monstrous the Israeli apartheid is.
Ahh the benevolent Israelis!
https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/...n-territories/
One can and should condemn Hamas for these atrocities but don’t gloss over how monstrous the Israeli apartheid is.
still more than it’s neighbors, and as evidenced by the massive protests this summer, many people there don’t like this turn. In contrast to Palestine where Hamas still have plurality support in Gaza.
war is shitty in part because people die, and I’ve no idea if that rocket was a mistake or not. I also have no idea how one is supposed to deal with a place where barbarians are well integrated.
Cisco’s point is that Netanyahu is intentionally elevating Hamas, who is all the things you say they are. His question is whether he’s doing that intentionally so that he has a reason for further killing of Palestinians in Gaza.
So, what’s is his reason for elevating Hamas? At best, it’s just because he knows that as long as they stay in power there will be no one to negotiate with over a Palestinian state.
Seeker of Truth. Dispenser of Wisdom. Protector of the Weak. Avenger of Evil.
@Montucky and Mv thanks for saying it better than me. As we hear more from family over there my usual cold self is getting kind of emotional.
Any minute or later or... I think that we'd be arrogant to think that it won't touch us.
I can't disagree and it has created quite the divide, not just the obvious within Israel but among supporters worldwide.
There’s no one to negotiate with because there’s no popular support on either side for a two state solution now. Especially among the youth in Gaza. The time for that is blown. An economically thriving well armed apartheid state vs a poor theocratic state committed to suicidal destruction of an entire people. Not a good situation.
While I can acknowledge things haven't been 100% rosy and things aren't always as black and white as they initially seem, in THIS case if everyone can't clearly discern who the truly evil ones are, then I'm not even sure what to say.
Thankfully nobody here is justifying the attacks, and while I truly do appreciate that, there are certainly some who are dabbling in sympathies. You can talk about how "monstrous" the Israeli apartheid is all you want, however, but perhaps terms like that should be reserved more for what we just saw. Now THAT'S monstrous. This is a clear cut case. Sure, we've seen the usual atrocities of war before but jeez. We have NEVER in our lifetimes seen anything quite like this on a scale such as this. Particularly posted to social media.
Serious question: Have you watched the videos of the attacks? I mean the truly horrific ones. I seriously had nightmares all night last night and couldn't sleep for many hours. I couldn't eat dinner. I was pretty quiet with my family this morning. All I could think about were some of the hostage videos I saw with the children, thinking of my own if we were in this situation. I can't even imagine.![]()
I doubt this.
But were it indeed the case, Netanyahu could never allow such a degree of embarrassment and carnage. What happened in Israel created a significant political crisis that Bibi is unlikely to survive.
Unless there's a revolution, or attempt to effect change in another sovereign nation, false flag naratives can't support this- to move swiftly, politics have to remain predictable.
At least that's what I remember from Macchiavelli.
Your dog just ate an avocado!
I agree with all that. Especially the ‘not a good situation’ which is the point I’ve been harping on.
But it didn’t clarify what Netanyahu’s desired outcomes were when he had a stated policy of ‘bolstering’ Hamas. He against a Palestinian state, so then what? Just more of the same forever?
Clearly Netanyahu misjudged Hamas. Despite the fact Hamas openly told the world it stood for killing Jews, Netanyahu thought he could manage Hamas by allowing Hamas to remain in power through graft. By allowing Hamas to take a percentage of Gaza's trade and aid, Likud thought they could moderate the level of violence.
He wasn't alone. The UN, NGOs, Western governments, etc., thought they could democratize and dradicalize Hamas into becoming a not so bad bad-actor. Controlling electricity and water, for example, was a tactical way in which Hamas and the Isreali government tacitly worked together. Hamas would launch rockets and fire mortars at Israel, Israel would cut power, and then both sides would agree to a truce.
Israel and the world thought accommodating Hamas would eventually lead to some sort of accord similar to what was achieved with the IRA in the UK. Everyone knew Hamas was terrible, few thought they were ISIS level sociopaths.
definitely! And a functioning economy, unemployment is 25%. To get that they need to end the enforced poverty of terrorism though, where Hamas uses infrastructure to base terror, Israel destroys infrastructure, Palestine gets more dependent on age.
One of the rave victims described the terrorists as 16-17 year olds (I’ve heard Israelis say this before) which means many of those youth are probably already being trained
Bookmarks