
Originally Posted by
3eyedsmiley
What about a music service that allows you to choose between unlimited downloads for fixed price or buying songs a la carte? SO then if you only periodically buy songs, you choose the latter and if you dl lots of stuff you do the former.
Yeah dealing witht he mob isnot a happy thought. They could easily be draining money or somethjing. Be afraid. Very afraid.
If they do manage to extort money from you, the Russian police won't care. From what I heard, they DO care about caviar (mmm).
If you're talking unlimited streaming for a fixed price with the option to buy songs at less than .99 then Rhapsody, Yahoo! Music Unlimited, and Napster too (even tho I hate Napster) fit that qualification.
MD9's idea is good, but not feasable legally methinks. I think a good thing would be to allow DRM downloads of a CD and send the actual CD in the mail for a few bucks cheaper than the actual CD. For instance, Rhapsody right now has a promo where all CD's cost 7.99 to download. It would be sweet if I could pay 9.99 or 10.99 and download them instantly and also have the CD shipped to me. Theoretically it seems they wouldn't have to pay record companies any extra for that.
Overall, I am a fan of the subscription model. I think people need to get used to it, and devices need to be more universally compliant. I'm well aware that iPods are the coolest audio players out there, but I can't bring myself to buy one. As soon as I can listen to my subscription service easily on my home stereo, in my car, at my computer, and on my mp3 player I'll be completely satisfied. No one complains about renting movies for most of their viewing, I just think consumers need to think about it differently. I still buy my absolute favorite music, but am exposed to so much new music via subscriptions.
Wow, that's kinda long... Full Disclosure: I do marketing work with one of the online music services, so I spend a lot of time thinking about this shit.
</rant>
It's not that I'm lazy, it's that I just don't care.
Bookmarks