Return of the R/R - Heritage Lab 132 - Dedicated Thread

[Norseman]

That'd be fun, riff. We'd be sandbagged hard, I have the feelin.

Please excuse the tame skiing in that lil vid up there... we were wigged out by the windloading in the chutes until seeing that they had already slid. Two inches of fresh on the bedsurface enforced a speed limit till apron spit.

Stoked to get back on the fatties asap

[gaijin]

Deleted. I was asking about how this ski compares to a Ren, but I think I can imagine.

[Lord Thomas]

That looks like something I’d enjoy! Norse- you, me and Lord Thomas should line up a PNW C132 summit someday…


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

I'm Lord Thomas, and I approve this message

[gaijin]

…

[Marshal Olson]

Deleted. I was asking about how this ski compares to a Ren, but I think I can imagine.

You know the pow skis I like

[Hopeless Sinner]

haha, love it.
there is 1 pair left in the current batch.

assuming there are a few pre-orders for next round, I’ll press more, but no preorders for it yet…. So it might take a year off and come back the following run.

I got FR132 n+2 and I'm happy I finally did it, although it will insure it won't snow any more than in 3" increments till next December. LOL

Love the turns in the burnt forest - unique video. Thanks for posting.

[SkiLyft]

You know what surprised me on my c132… their ability to squash chunder and chop inbounds.

Second half of the day skiing some 3D soft bump runs. Was launching of a bump and smashing the tops of other bumps and sliding into the trough.

Wasn’t expecting that from a carbon ski.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[wapiti hunter]

Slight delay on getting mounted, jig got borrowed out. Biggest drop I ever landed was on the Protests so I wanted that much tail. The Lotus always felt like it needed to be longer and washed out on drops for me. So I went 200cm and -10.5 for those reasons.

Figured you all would appreciate relative forward and aft lengths.
All mounted for 336mm BSL
-196cm Protests at ? I’ll check, but recommended point. For sale…
-200cm c132 at -10.5
-192cm 138 lotus at -2cm. Retired, trashed.
-190cm Bibby at -2 (I think. Could be -1).
-184cm wildcat 101 at 0
-189cm Seth’s at ? I’ll check but I think +1 or 2 on k2 scale. Retired, trashed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[vinnay]

Anyone else have thoughts on mount for these? I have spoons on the line and spats on the line (which I think are much further forward). Generally a directional skier but want to make sure these have the quickness and ability to drift that the original spats had. Plan is to go -11.5 per Marshal’s input without other perspectives.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[SkiLyft]

I’m on a 200 at -9.5.

It skis super balanced there, I’m a more modern skiier so take that with a grain of salt. I think there is a large sweet spot on these bad boys .


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[tgapp]

I'm just going to come out and say it

I really fucked up by not getting a pair of these when I had the chance

Go ski some pow for me, mags. Fuck. And don't be an idiot like I am.

Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk

[Marshal Olson]

You can borrow my pair any time (storms look to be rolling in again). Just text me!

[riff]

I’m on la sportiva skorpius boots (moderate forward lean) with Oazo bindings, touring only. 190 length. 5’10”, 185. Thinking -10.5 or -10….thoughts? I definitely want the pivoting/nimble feel, probably not driving tips too hard with the light boots.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[Marshal Olson]

With little-ish boots and your size/use, I’d say go -10

[riff]

Perfect thanks!


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[lucknau]

Here are my suggested mount details:

-11.5 (~84cm from tail) => full directional/alpine setup, comparable to the old stuff
-10 (~85.5 from tail) => Lightweight AT bindings and/or "neutral" skier
-8.5 (~87cm from tail) => "modern skier" mount.

Above was for the 190. Are we thinking the same range is good for the 200?


Edit: n/m. I see the website says yes

[Core Shot]

Figured you all would appreciate relative forward and aft lengths.
All mounted for 336mm BSL
-196cm Protests at ? I’ll check, but recommended point. For sale…
-200cm c132 at -10.5
-192cm 138 lotus at -2cm. Retired, trashed.
-190cm Bibby at -2 (I think. Could be -1).
-184cm wildcat 101 at 0
-189cm Seth’s at ? I’ll check but I think +1 or 2 on k2 scale. Retired, trashed.

That rack is awesome!!

Marker and Tyrolia need not apply.

[JayPowHound]

That rack is awesome!!

Marker and Tyrolia need not apply.

I was trying to figure it out.. what is the connection for the toe piece?

[J. Barron DeJong]

I was trying to figure it out.. what is the connection for the toe piece?

Looks like Button Ski rack to me.

[JayPowHound]

Thanks. Somehow had never heard of them. Just ordered a 5 pack to start, we'll see where it goes from there. Psyched.

[CaliBrit]

Thanks. Somehow had never heard of them. Just ordered a 5 pack to start, we'll see where it goes from there. Psyched.

Yeah these looks sweet. Need a tech toe equivalent! Organize the whole closet.

[::: :::]

I just like how you can see mount point vs tip and tail lengths between different skis

[wapiti hunter]

I just like how you can see mount point vs tip and tail lengths between different skis

Yea. Beware. You can see slight difference in brake width or design causing the toes to be slightly high or low in the pic. But good enough for relative….highly recommend the Button rack. Doesn’t put stress on the ski like those others. The others seem like they will take the rocker or camber out over time.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[bw_wp_hedonism]

I’ve resorted to leaning skis against the death clamps in the ski room.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[lucknau]

200cm C132: Holes drilled and tapped at -10.5cm… waiting 7 long days for toe shims to arrive. Probably should have just drawn and had them printed. Twiddling thumbs. Champing at the bit.