
Originally Posted by
anotherVTskibum
My takeaway from the complaint is that it is 100% down the fairway trademark infringement, with the kicker being that people are actively confusing the mark holder (the ski shop) with the Internet-infamous person using their mark without permission. The examples I recall were contacting the shop in search of items they ordered online but hadn't received and people asking the principals of the shop why they were fundraising online.
I'd hope the lawyers want to write a complaint that makes for a straightforward and clear-cut decision for their client and thus judging a case based solely on one party's filling is dicey, but unless they overlooked some material facts, I find it hard to believe that the plaintiff wouldn't prevail in court.
Bookmarks