
Originally Posted by
kid-kapow
i am bit surprised by the critique on the new corvus. The main design objective of the Corvus has always been for it to be a ski that could handle all conditions from the top to the bottom in Chamonix no? And surely the new version does does this no?
While they no longer have a dedicated charger in the freeride-lineup, their current offering of atris-new corvus-anima-nocta is a logical progression in a similar theme. Easy to ski ski skis that caters to lots of skiers, while not being quite what a limited number of top end skiers want for full on mach looney yet still can be skied fairly hard and still be playful. I've only skied the current Atris, a ski that I found to be pretty mediocre if still enjoyable, and the previous Nocta, a ski that was fun but not anything close to the best powder ski ever type ski. Yet, I pretty confident that I could put most skiers on them and for them to have a good day. The guy I sold the Atris to absolutely loved them.
The last time people were this animated was when the Koala119 became the 118. The 118 is a much better ski imho. The uncompromising flex pattern of the 118 make them limited to excel in a few conditions (dry/light snow or going straight under very, very proficient and heavy skiers), and the 118 could frankly be a bit more refined in the flex pattern department as well imho - que BlackOps118 comparison. The LP105 turned MPro108 is kinda a similar story - arguably less ski, but a more (imho) refined flex pattern and more versatile shape make for a ski that is both super capable at mach looney, but way easier to ski across most conditions.
So surely - "less" ski is surely not always less performance, especially if you look across most conditions?
Bookmarks