
Originally Posted by
Adolf Allerbush
Not really tracking what the point of this discussion that you and Conundrum are having. Is the idea that we do more with the 5% or 10% of weapons classified as assault style weapons with the hopes that this reduces some of the mass shooting events? Additionally, is the point you two are making that this represents a smaller number of weapons to deal with so it may be feasible?
Banning semi automatics or "assault weapons" is a bridge to far. Or at least that's been the case for the last 18 years.
There is a chance that you could reclassify them. Or not. Im stupid.
"I don't pretend to have all the answers, and I think there's something to be said for that" -One For The Road
Brain dead and made of money.
Bookmarks