Check Out Our Shop
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7
Results 151 to 156 of 156

Thread: School me on race skis

  1. #151
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Aspen
    Posts
    3,381
    Quote Originally Posted by alpinevibes View Post
    You dudes are making me want to mount up these dumpster finds. I’ve got some old FKS Course 14’s that would fit

    Attachment 480264
    TGR Forums
    Bump. Ended up picking up some 193cm Racetiger GS r27m with mint 997 Drivers on them. Skied them this week (my first time on a "race" ski) and damn were they fun. Super super fun and not demanding. Thanks for the inspiration boys

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2374.jpg 
Views:	162 
Size:	782.4 KB 
ID:	491336

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Feldkirch
    Posts
    38
    Dragging up an old thread and going to highjack it with a question if possible.


    Some friends were playing with their new grinding machine and gave my 2011 HEAD GS RDs a bit of love so I'm gonna take those out on the weekend, but it raised a question.

    A fair amount has happened to off-piste stuff since the 2010 Hellbents.... Apart from FIS changing the dimensions, what has changed in race skis over the last 15 years?

  3. #153
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    The greatest N. New Mexico resort in Colorado
    Posts
    2,311
    Sidecut and, depending on make/model, where that sidecut lies. Jumping from a >27m ski to a >30m ski is a significant change regardless of how you feel about stated sidecut radius. But a lot of the 21m skis had a rear-biased sidecut (slightly wider tail in relation to tip) so they were super easy to drive across the fall line, while most of the 27m skis started to taper the tail more. The 30m skis are tapered even more, so in addition to there being significantly less sidecut, it's accessible in a very different part of the ski and the turn. But they stivot like a MFer, so there's that.


    We don't talk about the 35m gs skis. Those things were horrible.

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Feldkirch
    Posts
    38
    Very cool thanks, I had a pair of evil 193 Blizzard Europacup GS skis from the long radius days but I never really used them because they scared the crÄp out of me.

    Apart from tuning materials to the sidecut etc. do you know if there has there been any real advances in the construction? Im just intrigued now.

  5. #155
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    The greatest N. New Mexico resort in Colorado
    Posts
    2,311
    Realistically, no, and that's a good thing. Race skis are still made out of ski stuff, unlike so many recreational skis nowadays which are made primarily of popcorn and hope. Most of the exotic materials (carbon, graphene, etc) are used relatively sparingly in favor of hardwoods, titanal, rubber and fiberglass.

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Among Greatness All Around
    Posts
    6,889
    Very cool thanks, I had a pair of evil 193 Blizzard Europacup GS skis from the long radius days but I never really used them because they scared the crÄp out of me.Apart from tuning materials to the sidecut etc. do you know if there has there been any real advances in the construction? Im just intrigued now.
    There have been some things over the years- stuff like attempts at increased dampening (few -Atomic, Volkl and others had mounted some rails or carbon on the top sheet as one example) or a design trying to make them stiffer or instead of just wood and titanal or titanium in the core, using carbon fiber, and carbon with Titanal layer and then wood topsheet, adding fiberglass also,etc.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •