That's the conventional wisdom, but I've always thought that leaves a lot of money on the table. Because putting that money in a more risky (but still conservative) mutual fund will bring lots more in returns. And the risk of losing, say, 5-10% in a huge downtown isn't likely to screw up the money's purpose as an emergency fund. Plus, the people smart enough to have this emergency fund are not very likely to need it, and certainly not need all of it. Having $50k or whatever earning money market rates seems like a loss of income (because there are plenty of conservative mutual funds that routinely bring in way more than that, and are still completely liquid).
Bookmarks