
Originally Posted by
Markhpnc
So it sounded like a few of you had experience with WRXs and nobody else besides funkendrenchman has driven them in the snow?
Or they decided that a thread about fuel octane is really not a place to discuss the WRXs ability to perform in the snow.
As far as knock sensors go, I would tend to agree with Tom and Ray, and the point in that article that continued use of sub-recommended octane fuel in a particular engine is not a good thing. Here and there for a few tanks of gas at a time, OK.
It all depends on how sophisticated the engine management of the particular engine is however. The WRX engine is pretty primative. Boost in, pressure up, power out. If you run lower octane, the fuel causes pinging, because the boost remains constant. Saabs (and some others) for example electronically retard the boost on the turbo when lower octane fuel is recognized. Theoretically, with the Trionic system on Saabs, you are able to run low grade fuel, get comparable fuel milage, only with a hit in performance. This hit in performance is pretty noticable, because your turbo is not boosting nearly to where it was with high-grade.
The best point here though is the economic consideration that article gives, where continuing to buy high-grage fuel only averages $171 more a year. (And that is on a vehicle that gets 14mpg average.) I filled up my 16gal tank for $50 the other day with high grade. Sure, breaking that $50 ceiling sure hurts, but buying the low grade still would have cost me $45. The only reason this whole issue is getting a lot of press right now is because the overall cost of gas is so high, giving high grade a psychological disadvantage. You are always going to pay $5 more a tank for high grade vs. low grade, whether prices are averaging at $0.99 or $3.99.
As I rained blows upon him, I realized there had to be another way.
Bookmarks