Check Out Our Shop
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 42

Thread: Height of Hucks

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    6,595

    Height of Hucks

    Here's an exercise I'd love a few of you guys to conduct for me this season.

    Take a bunch of decent skiers and line them up above a huckable cliff/rock band. Get them to jump off and measure the distance from lip of cliff to impact with a length of rope. Tag the distance on the rope with duct tape, and mark the tape with the skier's initials. Then ask them how far they think they've jumped.

    Once you've done this measure the rope at your leisure and publish the results. It'd be fascinating to see how we estimate the height of a huck.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    London : the L is for Value!
    Posts
    4,574
    Do you get bonus distance if you hit it switch and ride into the road?

    edg
    Do you realize that you've just posted an admission of ignorance so breathtaking that it disqualifies you from commenting on any political or economic threads from here on out?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    6,595
    That's just not scientific.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    5,917
    What about bonus distance it it's under a lift and you yell "Hey everybody, watch me beater over this cliff".
    "Can't vouch for him, though he seems normal via email."

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    4,101
    " No way, that rope shrunk. See, right there, all tape is all shrunken up too. I know that's a forty footer. Twenty three feet my ass!"

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Was UT, AK, now MT
    Posts
    14,584
    That huck was 30,40, no 50ft high.

    Just like the male anatomy measurement.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    the Quagmire
    Posts
    4,222
    According to someone on this board (I don't remember who) you can only measure the vertical of the exposed rock. You may fly 250 vertical feet through the air, but if there's only 5 ft of exposed rock, you just hucked 5ft.
    Last edited by crashnburn'd; 09-01-2005 at 07:56 AM. Reason: clarification

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    WYO
    Posts
    9,707
    What about doing it on old straight skis? Bonus?
    "Have fun, get a flyrod, and give the worm dunkers the finger when you start double hauling." ~Lumpy

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    11,326
    Quote Originally Posted by crashnburn'd
    According to someone on this board (I don't remember who) you can only measure the vertical of the exposed rock. You may fly 250 feet through the air, but if there's only 5 ft of exposed rock, you just hucked 5ft.
    Agreed.

    Height and distance are two seperate measurements.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    677
    How bout bonus points if your on the east coast on really shitty snow with no real landing area?
    I stay up all night, I go to sleep watching dragnet

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    the Quagmire
    Posts
    4,222
    Quote Originally Posted by truth
    Agreed.

    Height and distance are two seperate measurements.
    see my clarification above...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    4,101
    Bonus points and East Coast shouldn't be in the same sentence.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,244
    Goddamn word problems.....

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    the Quagmire
    Posts
    4,222
    Quote Originally Posted by trainnvain
    Bonus points and East Coast shouldn't be in the same sentence.
    how about bonus points for nekkid and 20 below?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    6,595
    Quote Originally Posted by truth
    Agreed.

    Height and distance are two seperate measurements.
    Okay then, bust some of that trigonometry shit out. Work out the pure vert as well as the total distance. We love stats.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    677
    Quote Originally Posted by trainnvain
    Bonus points and East Coast shouldn't be in the same sentence.

    http://www.meatheadfilms.com/webvide...risticeweb.mov

    I dont know I think this guys gets points.
    I stay up all night, I go to sleep watching dragnet

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    6,595

    Talking

    If points are awarded for a shameless lack of commitment to landing on your feet, then yes, he's up to his nuts in points.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Vallee Teton
    Posts
    2,729
    Quote Originally Posted by bad_roo
    Okay then, bust some of that trigonometry shit out. Work out the pure vert as well as the total distance. We love stats.
    For vert, one could take altimeter readings at takeoff and landing. On second thought, alitmeters probably aren't accurate enough.

    Measuring the horizontal seems more difficult (levitate or tunnel). On the other hand, one could estimate angle of tape strung from takeoff to landing (inclinometer). WIth hypotenuse and angle, we're good to go (via said trigonometry shite).

  19. #19
    adam is offline The Shred Pirate Roberts
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    3,543
    All I know Is that it looks a hell of a lot bigger when your on top of it.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    6,595

    Talking

    Whilst we're getting all mathematical, how about an index that calculates height of huck and angle of landing to illustrate the thump factor?

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    23,139
    Quote Originally Posted by crashnburn'd
    According to someone on this board (I don't remember who) you can only measure the vertical of the exposed rock. You may fly 250 vertical feet through the air, but if there's only 5 ft of exposed rock, you just hucked 5ft.
    You can huck many things. Trees... ice walls... rocks... cliffs... cornices...

    There's no rock in a cornice... if you huck 50ft off a cornice with no rock, is that 0ft huck?

    Nope... you hucked 250ft... you hucked a 5ft rock. Both valid statements.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    4,101
    A²+B²= Thump²? Who wuuda thunk?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    318 Powder Lane
    Posts
    3,647
    slope angle greatly influences said thump factor.

    Maybe a GPS mesurement to do away with all of this stoopid math talk.
    fighting gravity on a daily basis

    WhiteRoom Skis
    Handcrafted in Northern Vermont
    www.whiteroomcustomskis.com

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    1,290
    Huck heights and distances are usually only slightly more exaggerated than slope angle assessments. "Holy shit I can't believe I just dropped that 30 footer onto a 55 degree face" translation 12 footer to 32 degree slope.
    "Do the interns get Glocks ? "

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    2,931
    Unless we're talking truly ginormous hucks, the consumer GPS that folks are likely to have with them wouldn't be accurate enough.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •