Check Out Our Shop
Page 9 of 27 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 225 of 660

Thread: New Foot Scanner App

  1. #201
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    47
    I find this app really interesting, confirmed a lot of what I was already thinking about my feet. I kept scrolling through the posts trying to find someone with a similar scan, but didn't see it. So here goes, my screen shots below. I've been in Lange xt130 LV boots, intuition liner, sole footbeds for awhile now and in the market for a new boot. Should I stick with them as I don't have any real problems, or anything else you would recommend?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Left.jpg 
Views:	137 
Size:	104.6 KB 
ID:	361239

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	right.jpg 
Views:	141 
Size:	105.2 KB 
ID:	361240

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Front.jpg 
Views:	128 
Size:	106.6 KB 
ID:	361241

  2. #202
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Yurp
    Posts
    156

    New Foot Scanner App

    So, App kept crashing with iPhone 8 but worked flawless with iPadpro.

    I am in 27,5 cochises 130 18/19 and they are my best fit ever. Left liner is a bit too short, so switched liners for custom ones.
    I always feel like i have too big shells and too short liners. However with the cochises its ok.






    Gesendet von iPad mit Tapatalk
    Last edited by salx; 02-05-2021 at 03:09 PM.

  3. #203
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,492
    Quote Originally Posted by iriponsnow View Post
    I *think* my talus / malleolus is just "fat" often the second buckle refuses to overlap the shell & the heel just feels as if its not sitting where it should be. Mid foot is just all jammed up. Clog/cuff tend to run into each other in 24 from Lange/Rossi, Dobie & Salomon.... Dobie in a 25 works best of the bunch, but is excessively long. Fischer, Salomon, Lange 25's feel way too long.... Cuff on the 24's also tends to feel too low, esp w/ Langes.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2ACDF40E-E77F-431F-86F5-DED9D7D6318C.jpeg 
Views:	123 
Size:	109.0 KB 
ID:	361252

    Re-scanned at work on a newer device & it sizes myself slightly bigger.

  4. #204
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Philly, PA
    Posts
    1,903
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    No reason not to stay with a 27.5 Cochise (I am assuming you want a hybrid boot with touring capability), I would probably look at the new one (2022) with the lockable external walk mode, but the current model is fine. Another option might be a Hawx Prime XTD (both are relatively tall instep boots, which could be an issue for you, esp. on the left). If you're happy with whoever did the navicular and forefoot work on your old boots, take the new ones to the same fitter. Have them give you a little extra length on the right boot while you're there.
    Greg, can you explain again how you figure last width based on these measurements? Based on the numbers I'm mildly shocked that I was able to get into these 99mm last boots. Also has the forefoot width changed much with the newer versions of the Cochise vs the old one?

  5. #205
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by Schmitty BC View Post
    I find this app really interesting, confirmed a lot of what I was already thinking about my feet. I kept scrolling through the posts trying to find someone with a similar scan, but didn't see it. So here goes, my screen shots below. I've been in Lange xt130 LV boots, intuition liner, sole footbeds for awhile now and in the market for a new boot. Should I stick with them as I don't have any real problems, or anything else you would recommend?
    Hard to argue with the XT LV if you have a proven winner; no reason not to go with the current iteration (XT3 LV). Any problem with the instep?

  6. #206
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by salx View Post
    So, App kept crashing with iPhone 8 but worked flawless with iPadpro.

    I am in 27,5 cochises 130 18/19 and they are my best fit ever. Left liner is a bit too short, so switched liners for custom ones.
    I always feel like i have too big shells and too short liners. However with the cochises its ok.




    Gesendet von iPad mit Tapatalk
    Thanks! Could you post the numbers for the left foot, and screenshots from the left and right side?

  7. #207
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by Duffman View Post
    Greg, can you explain again how you figure last width based on these measurements? Based on the numbers I'm mildly shocked that I was able to get into these 99mm last boots. Also has the forefoot width changed much with the newer versions of the Cochise vs the old one?
    I convert the width into the width a 26.5 boot would be, as that is how manufacturers list their boots. For a 27.5 foot, you would subtract 2mm. In your case, that would be 110.7mm for the wider foot. Most experienced skiers will be able to go down another 5-6mm without difficulty (maybe with a punch at the forefoot). TGR hardcores can typically go down 8-10mm, which would be a 100mm last for you (Cochise is 99mm). With a little patience and a good bootfitter, even more is possible - my right foot measures 117mm @ 26.5 and all my boots are 97, 98 and 99mm.

    Availabilty of bootfitting and overall volume of the foot are keys to whether you can pull this off.

    Forefoot width has stayed remarkably the same through the generations with both the Cochise and Zero G boots.

  8. #208
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Yurp
    Posts
    156
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    Thanks! Could you post the numbers for the left foot, and screenshots from the left and right side?
    Edited my first post


    Gesendet von iPad mit Tapatalk

  9. #209
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    47
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    Hard to argue with the XT LV if you have a proven winner; no reason not to go with the current iteration (XT3 LV). Any problem with the instep?
    The instep hurts the first or second day of the year, but then goes away. If anything I sometimes feel like I still have too much room in the toebox, but I guess that's because of my narrow feet. Any narrow boots with a high instep you would suggest?

  10. #210
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by Schmitty BC View Post
    The instep hurts the first or second day of the year, but then goes away. If anything I sometimes feel like I still have too much room in the toebox, but I guess that's because of my narrow feet. Any narrow boots with a high instep you would suggest?
    You want a boot with a walk mode?

    You won't find anything much narrower than a 97mm Lange XT; the Hawx Ultra XTD is similar in width, taller in the instep, but has a very small cuff diameter that probably will cut into the front of your ankle. Dalbello Lupo Pro HD is also fairly narrow in the toebox, tallish instep, but the walk mode is marginal.

    Are you in a 26.5 or a 25.5 Lange?

  11. #211
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by salx View Post
    Edited my first post
    Vielen Dank!

  12. #212
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Philly, PA
    Posts
    1,903
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    I convert the width into the width a 26.5 boot would be, as that is how manufacturers list their boots. For a 27.5 foot, you would subtract 2mm. In your case, that would be 110.7mm for the wider foot. Most experienced skiers will be able to go down another 5-6mm without difficulty (maybe with a punch at the forefoot). TGR hardcores can typically go down 8-10mm, which would be a 100mm last for you (Cochise is 99mm). With a little patience and a good bootfitter, even more is possible - my right foot measures 117mm @ 26.5 and all my boots are 97, 98 and 99mm.

    Availabilty of bootfitting and overall volume of the foot are keys to whether you can pull this off.

    Forefoot width has stayed remarkably the same through the generations with both the Cochise and Zero G boots.
    Thanks for this. Availability of good bootfitting this year is a bit problematic, my usual guys in VT I always buy boots from are great ,but with the travel restrictions there which I am trying my best to abide it's tough to get up there enough to get the work and the tweaks done. I guess the question for me is with the size of the app putting me right between the 27.5 and 28 , it probably makes sense to stay with the 27.5 and punch more for ball of foot width (which I will need either way) and some toe length on the right side , in order to get the tight fit I need in the heel and ankle areas. Sound about right or does the tighter last in the heel area make the 28.5 a feasable option?

  13. #213
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by Duffman View Post
    Thanks for this. Availability of good bootfitting this year is a bit problematic, my usual guys in VT I always buy boots from are great ,but with the travel restrictions there which I am trying my best to abide it's tough to get up there enough to get the work and the tweaks done. I guess the question for me is with the size of the app putting me right between the 27.5 and 28 , it probably makes sense to stay with the 27.5 and punch more for ball of foot width (which I will need either way) and some toe length on the right side , in order to get the tight fit I need in the heel and ankle areas. Sound about right or does the tighter last in the heel area make the 28.5 a feasable option?
    Stick with the 27.5, and get the work you need done by someone you trust. You can never really shrink the ankle and heel in a boot that's too big in a satisfying way (plus heel widths vary much less than forefoot/volume in different brands/lasts).

    You may not even need to punch the right side for length.

  14. #214
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    51
    Sorry just catching up on this thread:
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    Tell your wife gregL from TGR says "thank you!"
    I
    think the app wants the feet placed in a particular relation to the piece of paper, so everyone is pretty much at the same width . . .

    PS What boot is your wife in? Or only snowboard boots? As for ski boots that come in 21.5, you are pretty much limited to Dalbello (3 models) and a few plug race boots.
    She's stuck to snowboards since 15. Did try some kids race boots but did not enjoy them.

    Quote Originally Posted by CaliBrit View Post
    Makes me want to try some Lange Rx.....

    Any punches?
    No punches, There were a couple pads added to the front of my ankle to help with toe jam when i land backseat but other than that the boots have been perfect for me.

  15. #215
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    489
    In solidarity for me wide foot brethren, here's my fat Asian feet...

    My inbounds boots are 26.5 Cochise (99mm) and I tour in a 27.5 Scott Cosmos 3 (stated 103mm last). I spent the entire season last year making the Cochise fit my wide forefoot. I, no joke, have gotten them punched 5,6 times. But it was worth it because the Cochise now fit like a dream and skis great.

    Now I see that they've announced a new, improved Cochise for next year and it's piqued my interest. However, after going through the long, painful process of making them fit a EEE foot, I'll hold off for a while before upgrading....

    The Scott Cosmos 3 have no modification....tbh I'm not in love with them, but there's really no other options out there.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1147.png 
Views:	113 
Size:	542.4 KB 
ID:	361552Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1146.png 
Views:	105 
Size:	528.0 KB 
ID:	361553Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1144.png 
Views:	103 
Size:	548.9 KB 
ID:	361554
    90% of skiing is just looking cool

  16. #216
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Right Coast
    Posts
    1,113
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4287.JPG 
Views:	125 
Size:	234.8 KB 
ID:	361694

    In Lange RS120 26.5, might need some room for big toes particularly on right foot.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  17. #217
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by bennettc14 View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4287.JPG 
Views:	125 
Size:	234.8 KB 
ID:	361694

    In Lange RS120 26.5, might need some room for big toes particularly on right foot.
    Thanks. Could you post screenshots of your feet from the left and right as well?

  18. #218
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Right Coast
    Posts
    1,113

    New Foot Scanner App

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1612721059.857524.jpg 
Views:	117 
Size:	235.3 KB 
ID:	361702
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4288.JPG 
Views:	113 
Size:	234.5 KB 
ID:	361703

    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  19. #219
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by bennettc14 View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1612721059.857524.jpg 
Views:	117 
Size:	235.3 KB 
ID:	361702
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4288.JPG 
Views:	113 
Size:	234.5 KB 
ID:	361703

    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Thanks, man! A little extra length is no problem, but you could really use less volume overall - unfortunately the only thing narrower is a plug boot and it will take a lot of work to get it to flex like a RS 120 . . .

  20. #220
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Right Coast
    Posts
    1,113
    Yeah moving down from 98 last helped a bit this season. Could definitely go stiffer, shop only had 120s in my size. Worth trying a different liner to take up some volume without going plug?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  21. #221
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by bennettc14 View Post
    Yeah moving down from 98 last helped a bit this season. Could definitely go stiffer, shop only had 120s in my size. Worth trying a different liner to take up some volume without going plug?
    Certainly. Any injected liner where you can add a little extra foam/cork should help take up volume.

  22. #222
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sun Valley, ID
    Posts
    2,635
    Posting for a friend. Trying to persuade him not to go up a size from a 27 HV Tecnica. But he is really struggling with instep height, ankles bruising and circulation to toes getting cut off. Thoughts? I’m telling him to get the boot board ground.

    Name:  IMG_5437.JPG
Views: 792
Size:  71.4 KB
    Name:  IMG_5436.JPG
Views: 765
Size:  70.8 KB

  23. #223
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by CaliBrit View Post
    Posting for a friend. Trying to persuade him not to go up a size from a 27 HV Tecnica. But he is really struggling with instep height, ankles bruising and circulation to toes getting cut off. Thoughts? I’m telling him to get the boot board ground.
    Hey Brit. I think he should be fine in the MV with, as you suggest, some bootboard grinding/footbed thinning/liner surgery. Is he locked into Tecnica for some reason? Atomic Hawx Prime might be a better call - also plenty of latitude to alter bootboard, etc. but a "heavy" heat mold (more like 10 minutes with hot oven) with foam taped over the instep could also solve it. He doesn't really need more width, he just needs to "ovalize" the instep shape.

  24. #224
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sun Valley, ID
    Posts
    2,635
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    Hey Brit. I think he should be fine in the MV with, as you suggest, some bootboard grinding/footbed thinning/liner surgery. Is he locked into Tecnica for some reason? Atomic Hawx Prime might be a better call - also plenty of latitude to alter bootboard, etc. but a "heavy" heat mold (more like 10 minutes with hot oven) with foam taped over the instep could also solve it. He doesn't really need more width, he just needs to "ovalize" the instep shape.
    Awesome Greg I’ll pass that on thanks! He’s an Evo customer.

  25. #225
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by CaliBrit View Post
    Awesome Greg I’ll pass that on thanks! He’s an Evo customer.
    Have been having an ongoing conversation with your friend via email and we've picked some boots to work with when he is next in Seattle, thanks for being the go-between!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •