Anyone know what the details are for the canyons lease from the FS? Curious if it would be possible for them to expand into that territory. Not that it would be desirable, but it wouldn't be unprecedented - similar to expansion into peak 7 of breck....
‘The Big One’- rescue, recovery | SummitDaily.com
Per onX top of 9990 isn’t on fs land, nor is the gate, it accesses FS land.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
"If we can't bring the mountain to the party, let's bring the PARTY to the MOUNTAIN!"
I know people have been getting buried there waaaay before the gram. I just think the pictures with location tags can give folks a false confidence and "beta" on a spot. I know when I was patroling at a now Ikoninc resort. A stupid magazine published an article and named an easily accessible out of bounds run and we regularly had tourons at the top shack asking us how to get there...
RIP to the victim. Always tragic and hopefully people will learn but that seems unlikely.
I'm not for closing the gate or regulating it. I also dont like the expansion talk from multiple standpoints:
1. First and foremost, Vail is a terrible steward of the land.
2. The public outrage would be immense. Where do you stop the expansion? Does Vail just get the whole ridgeline because it slides? You control dutches and then the next easy target is where the deaths start occurring. That whole ridgeline rips pretty good. You're just moving the target
3. Do you think Vail wants that responsibility? That's a lot more explosives and likely additional patrol hires to control the whole ridgeline and it's basically in their boundaries without them having to take responsibility for it already.
I don't wish anyone death in an avalanche but people can take responsibility for their actions. All actions have consequences, big and small.
It sucks this guy lost his life, I'm baffled as to how the Utah Avalanche center and Vail ski patrol could better warn people of the dangers out those gates. Even my 60 year old mom is aware of the avalanche danger at the moment.
Local news had overhead helicopter video of the slide path with lots of ski tracks on either side in the frame. Unless they got the location wrong, I don't know how you convince some random person the terrain is unsafe when everyone else is apparently getting away with it, so to speak.
Forecast for the Salt Lake Area Mountains
Issued by Drew Hardesty for Thursday, January 7, 2021
I suspect our luck will run out soon.
Avalanche conditions remain dangerous....
IF you are leaving the ski area at an exit gate, you are most likely stepping into a CONSIDERABLE avalanche hazard.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
It's a shitty situation, but if push comes to shove, they could look at closing the gates and direct the backcountry traffic to exit the area lower on the hill. Skinning for an hour or so is still great access to that ridgeline. Throw a bone by expanding uphill access on that side of the resort. Not sure how that could work logistically via safe routes that avoid all the private homes.
Kind of ridiculous, but UAC/FS volunteers could be present to intercept all potential victims to check for avy gear and relay the hazard. Small talk such as, "How many children do you have?" and "Do you feel lucky, punk?" might be effective.
Then there's the whole State-run biathalon idea of a hunter safety like program applied to backcountry users. Blech!
RIP
Point 2 since I hit send too fast:
Rename to "Death's Draw"
Having spent a few seasons hiking that gate and skinning that ridge on a regular basis I've unfortunately grown accustomed to having this conversation once every few years. The access is so easy and the views from the chair and number of tracks create a scenario that is far too tempting for the competent inbounds but unprepared backcountry skier and it leads to events like this on a recurring basis.
By no means an I advocating for a closure of the gates or the lift, people need to take responsibility for their own actions. However, given the number of fun-police yellow jacket employees that were on the mountain when I was still skiing there I'd like to think that Vail could spare a volunteer to hang out by the gate on days with danger above considerable to check beacons and ask the hard questions of people heading out.
The only change I'd advocate for would be a fence that both blocked some of the visibility and removed the possibility of ducking the rope to access that terrain without first hiking to the top of the ridge.
Three fundamentals of every extreme skier, total disregard for personal saftey, amphetamines, and lots and lots of malt liquor......-jack handy
^ well said
I wonder what keeps more resorts from doing this in the U.S? Are they afraid of liability from someone at the gate "not giving enough of a warning", or perhaps it's just plain ol' cheapness?
When we were skiing at Kiroro in Hokkaido, their main BC gate had a 1-2 resort employees there as a makeshift checkpoint. They were friendly, knowledgeable, and checking for avvy gear. Had one of those booster-club tents set up with a heater, so they felt comfortable while on the clock. Once you were past the gate you accepted the risks, but it was a heartwarming thing to encounter when you are a foreigner trying to make sense of an unfamiliar snowpack.
Yes, yes, I know that a Japanese ski are isn't the best comparison. But there is something to be said for having some level of face-to-face interaction before people go out of the gates. A single conversation before heading out of the gates can make all of the difference.
Probably wishful thinking, but with what's gone on with the pandemic, it may be good time to look at tort reform here in the US.
Nothing should change. no tort reform, no employee at the gate, no nothing. The sign warned him, he chose to ignore it.
This is certainly one of the issues - once you take any level of control over whether the gate is open or not or if any representative of Vail gives guidance as to whether someone should or should not go out of it, there is the potential for legal liability. Right now it is not Vail but the FS who is 'responsible'.
Now, there is nothing to stop a private citizen from posting up at the top of the gate and expressing their perspective to anyone without gear who happens to come along on a day where they really shouldnt be out there. I have some memories of MPPG & others being quite blunt with their opinions in years long past
How far up the road does the snow start in the Donut Falls Trail area? Was thinking this would be a nice safe walk up a snowy road to get some exercise and just to be out somewhere. Not looking to ski down anything as we don't quite have the backcountry knowledge to venture up a slope, just looking for the exercise and some skinning practice. Looking for any other recs as well?
The K-12 dude. You make a gnarly run like that and girls will get sterile just looking at you - Charles De Mar
I was was wondering what you 2 and mppg have to share. Where is he any way? Also, I would be interested what Jake and Powstash have to say about the past week in PC
“How does it feel to be the greatest guitarist in the world? I don’t know, go ask Rory Gallagher”. — Jimi Hendrix
When life gives you haters, make haterade.
Sound of Music is really deceptive, I think it's a really dangerous place. With all of the rollovers, Dutch is one of the most dangerous places in the Wasatch.
I left PC shortly after the 9990 Chair went in. If they had made the gate lower requiring a skin to get to the ridge it would have weeded out a lot of unprepared skiers.
Not nearly as much as leather boots and 55mm waisted skis did though.
Snow starts immediately but you gotta watch out for hoardes of sledders at the beginning. Park City lets you go up Home Run before 8:30am and after 6:00pm, more fun than the other options listed since you can actually make turns on the way down. If Alta starts cat skiing in Grizzly again then there will be a great cat track up from the summer road to Fantasy Ridge but its not in yet (if at all this year??)
Bookmarks