Check Out Our Shop
Page 45 of 170 FirstFirst ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 ... LastLast
Results 1,101 to 1,125 of 4250

Thread: WASATCH STOKE, CONDITIONS, OBSERVATIONS and ASSORTED DRIVAL 20-21

  1. #1101
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by telefreewasatch View Post
    I might get a detail wrong here, but,
    the permit to build and operate that lift required a permanently open gate.
    Believe it was Pave our Canyons pressuring the F.S.
    Tough hand dealt there.
    Actually super helpful. Thanks for bringing that up.

  2. #1102
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    125
    Anyone know what the details are for the canyons lease from the FS? Curious if it would be possible for them to expand into that territory. Not that it would be desirable, but it wouldn't be unprecedented - similar to expansion into peak 7 of breck....

    ‘The Big One’- rescue, recovery | SummitDaily.com

  3. #1103
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    8530' MST/200' EST
    Posts
    4,649
    Per onX top of 9990 isn’t on fs land, nor is the gate, it accesses FS land.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    "If we can't bring the mountain to the party, let's bring the PARTY to the MOUNTAIN!"

  4. #1104
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Montrose, CO
    Posts
    4,783
    Quote Originally Posted by lemonhead View Post
    I agree with Mall Walker and unfortunately I think the Instagram Pic culture is here to stay.
    Me and a buddy were just talking about this. All the 'gram shows is the stoke. It makes it look easy.

  5. #1105
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Alta
    Posts
    3,341
    Quote Originally Posted by lemonhead View Post
    I agree with Mall Walker and unfortunately I think the Instagram Pic culture is here to stay.
    People been dying in that exact spot before the gram was ever created. It’s just a shitty set up. Be safe out there. Snow pack is crap and about to get worse with a big high pressure. Pent up powder panic will get real when it finally starts to snow

  6. #1106
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    490
    I know people have been getting buried there waaaay before the gram. I just think the pictures with location tags can give folks a false confidence and "beta" on a spot. I know when I was patroling at a now Ikoninc resort. A stupid magazine published an article and named an easily accessible out of bounds run and we regularly had tourons at the top shack asking us how to get there...

  7. #1107
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Fresh Lake City
    Posts
    4,765
    RIP to the victim. Always tragic and hopefully people will learn but that seems unlikely.

    Quote Originally Posted by wasatch_carpetbagger View Post
    Anyone know what the details are for the canyons lease from the FS? Curious if it would be possible for them to expand into that territory. Not that it would be desirable, but it wouldn't be unprecedented - similar to expansion into peak 7 of breck....

    ‘The Big One’- rescue, recovery | SummitDaily.com
    I'm not for closing the gate or regulating it. I also dont like the expansion talk from multiple standpoints:

    1. First and foremost, Vail is a terrible steward of the land.

    2. The public outrage would be immense. Where do you stop the expansion? Does Vail just get the whole ridgeline because it slides? You control dutches and then the next easy target is where the deaths start occurring. That whole ridgeline rips pretty good. You're just moving the target

    3. Do you think Vail wants that responsibility? That's a lot more explosives and likely additional patrol hires to control the whole ridgeline and it's basically in their boundaries without them having to take responsibility for it already.

    I don't wish anyone death in an avalanche but people can take responsibility for their actions. All actions have consequences, big and small.

    It sucks this guy lost his life, I'm baffled as to how the Utah Avalanche center and Vail ski patrol could better warn people of the dangers out those gates. Even my 60 year old mom is aware of the avalanche danger at the moment.

  8. #1108
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Edge of the Great Basin
    Posts
    7,416
    Quote Originally Posted by brutah View Post
    It sucks this guy lost his life, I'm baffled as to how the Utah Avalanche center and Vail ski patrol could better warn people of the dangers out those gates. Even my 60 year old mom is aware of the avalanche danger at the moment.
    Local news had overhead helicopter video of the slide path with lots of ski tracks on either side in the frame. Unless they got the location wrong, I don't know how you convince some random person the terrain is unsafe when everyone else is apparently getting away with it, so to speak.

  9. #1109
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    40°39'32.94"N 111°35'45.68"W
    Posts
    742
    Forecast for the Salt Lake Area Mountains
    Issued by Drew Hardesty for Thursday, January 7, 2021

    I suspect our luck will run out soon.

    Avalanche conditions remain dangerous....

    IF you are leaving the ski area at an exit gate, you are most likely stepping into a CONSIDERABLE avalanche hazard.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  10. #1110
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    73
    It's a shitty situation, but if push comes to shove, they could look at closing the gates and direct the backcountry traffic to exit the area lower on the hill. Skinning for an hour or so is still great access to that ridgeline. Throw a bone by expanding uphill access on that side of the resort. Not sure how that could work logistically via safe routes that avoid all the private homes.

    Kind of ridiculous, but UAC/FS volunteers could be present to intercept all potential victims to check for avy gear and relay the hazard. Small talk such as, "How many children do you have?" and "Do you feel lucky, punk?" might be effective.

    Then there's the whole State-run biathalon idea of a hunter safety like program applied to backcountry users. Blech!

    RIP

  11. #1111
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Salt Lake Chitty, UT
    Posts
    1,606
    Quote Originally Posted by brutah View Post
    RIP to the victim. Always tragic and hopefully people will learn but that seems unlikely.



    I'm not for closing the gate or regulating it. I also dont like the expansion talk from multiple standpoints:

    1. First and foremost, Vail is a terrible steward of the land.

    2. The public outrage would be immense. Where do you stop the expansion? Does Vail just get the whole ridgeline because it slides? You control dutches and then the next easy target is where the deaths start occurring. That whole ridgeline rips pretty good. You're just moving the target

    3. Do you think Vail wants that responsibility? That's a lot more explosives and likely additional patrol hires to control the whole ridgeline and it's basically in their boundaries without them having to take responsibility for it already.

    I don't wish anyone death in an avalanche but people can take responsibility for their actions. All actions have consequences, big and small.

    It sucks this guy lost his life, I'm baffled as to how the Utah Avalanche center and Vail ski patrol could better warn people of the dangers out those gates. Even my 60 year old mom is aware of the avalanche danger at the moment.
    ^This, agree 100%

    As my AIARE 3 instructor said to me many years ago... "Not every bad decision has a bad outcome and not every good decision has a good outcome, some things boil down to luck"

    RIP to the victim

  12. #1112
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Salt Lake Chitty, UT
    Posts
    1,606
    Point 2 since I hit send too fast:

    Rename to "Death's Draw"

  13. #1113
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,843
    Quote Originally Posted by brutah View Post
    RIP to the victim. Always tragic and hopefully people will learn but that seems unlikely.



    I'm not for closing the gate or regulating it. I also dont like the expansion talk from multiple standpoints:

    1. First and foremost, Vail is a terrible steward of the land.

    2. The public outrage would be immense. Where do you stop the expansion? Does Vail just get the whole ridgeline because it slides? You control dutches and then the next easy target is where the deaths start occurring. That whole ridgeline rips pretty good. You're just moving the target

    3. Do you think Vail wants that responsibility? That's a lot more explosives and likely additional patrol hires to control the whole ridgeline and it's basically in their boundaries without them having to take responsibility for it already.

    I don't wish anyone death in an avalanche but people can take responsibility for their actions. All actions have consequences, big and small.

    It sucks this guy lost his life, I'm baffled as to how the Utah Avalanche center and Vail ski patrol could better warn people of the dangers out those gates. Even my 60 year old mom is aware of the avalanche danger at the moment.
    Having spent a few seasons hiking that gate and skinning that ridge on a regular basis I've unfortunately grown accustomed to having this conversation once every few years. The access is so easy and the views from the chair and number of tracks create a scenario that is far too tempting for the competent inbounds but unprepared backcountry skier and it leads to events like this on a recurring basis.

    By no means an I advocating for a closure of the gates or the lift, people need to take responsibility for their own actions. However, given the number of fun-police yellow jacket employees that were on the mountain when I was still skiing there I'd like to think that Vail could spare a volunteer to hang out by the gate on days with danger above considerable to check beacons and ask the hard questions of people heading out.

    The only change I'd advocate for would be a fence that both blocked some of the visibility and removed the possibility of ducking the rope to access that terrain without first hiking to the top of the ridge.
    Three fundamentals of every extreme skier, total disregard for personal saftey, amphetamines, and lots and lots of malt liquor......-jack handy

  14. #1114
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    northeast
    Posts
    5,968
    ^ well said

  15. #1115
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Missoula DMV
    Posts
    1,662
    Quote Originally Posted by soul_skier View Post
    *snip*

    By no means an I advocating for a closure of the gates or the lift, people need to take responsibility for their own actions. However, given the number of fun-police yellow jacket employees that were on the mountain when I was still skiing there I'd like to think that Vail could spare a volunteer to hang out by the gate on days with danger above considerable to check beacons and ask the hard questions of people heading out.
    I wonder what keeps more resorts from doing this in the U.S? Are they afraid of liability from someone at the gate "not giving enough of a warning", or perhaps it's just plain ol' cheapness?

    When we were skiing at Kiroro in Hokkaido, their main BC gate had a 1-2 resort employees there as a makeshift checkpoint. They were friendly, knowledgeable, and checking for avvy gear. Had one of those booster-club tents set up with a heater, so they felt comfortable while on the clock. Once you were past the gate you accepted the risks, but it was a heartwarming thing to encounter when you are a foreigner trying to make sense of an unfamiliar snowpack.

    Yes, yes, I know that a Japanese ski are isn't the best comparison. But there is something to be said for having some level of face-to-face interaction before people go out of the gates. A single conversation before heading out of the gates can make all of the difference.

  16. #1116
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Montrose, CO
    Posts
    4,783
    Quote Originally Posted by S_jenks View Post
    I wonder what keeps more resorts from doing this in the U.S? Are they afraid of liability from someone at the gate "not giving enough of a warning", or perhaps it's just plain ol' cheapness?
    Probably some of both with a good dose of good ol' American liability issues, but I'm no lawyer. By the resort acknowledging they should do something about warning people, have they now made it their problem?

  17. #1117
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    73
    Probably wishful thinking, but with what's gone on with the pandemic, it may be good time to look at tort reform here in the US.

  18. #1118
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    United States of Aburdistan
    Posts
    7,276
    Nothing should change. no tort reform, no employee at the gate, no nothing. The sign warned him, he chose to ignore it.

  19. #1119
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    3,519
    Quote Originally Posted by snowaddict91 View Post
    Probably some of both with a good dose of good ol' American liability issues, but I'm no lawyer. By the resort acknowledging they should do something about warning people, have they now made it their problem?
    This is certainly one of the issues - once you take any level of control over whether the gate is open or not or if any representative of Vail gives guidance as to whether someone should or should not go out of it, there is the potential for legal liability. Right now it is not Vail but the FS who is 'responsible'.

    Now, there is nothing to stop a private citizen from posting up at the top of the gate and expressing their perspective to anyone without gear who happens to come along on a day where they really shouldnt be out there. I have some memories of MPPG & others being quite blunt with their opinions in years long past

  20. #1120
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    73
    Quote Originally Posted by muted View Post
    Nothing should change. no tort reform, no employee at the gate, no nothing. The sign warned him, he chose to ignore it.
    I'm more interested in what could happen to the access. If liability laws changed, it would support the status quo.

  21. #1121
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Park City
    Posts
    908
    How far up the road does the snow start in the Donut Falls Trail area? Was thinking this would be a nice safe walk up a snowy road to get some exercise and just to be out somewhere. Not looking to ski down anything as we don't quite have the backcountry knowledge to venture up a slope, just looking for the exercise and some skinning practice. Looking for any other recs as well?
    The K-12 dude. You make a gnarly run like that and girls will get sterile just looking at you - Charles De Mar

  22. #1122
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Wasatch Back: 7000'
    Posts
    13,347
    I was was wondering what you 2 and mppg have to share. Where is he any way? Also, I would be interested what Jake and Powstash have to say about the past week in PC
    “How does it feel to be the greatest guitarist in the world? I don’t know, go ask Rory Gallagher”. — Jimi Hendrix

  23. #1123
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sandy
    Posts
    5,374
    Quote Originally Posted by TheK12 View Post
    How far up the road does the snow start in the Donut Falls Trail area? Was thinking this would be a nice safe walk up a snowy road to get some exercise and just to be out somewhere. Not looking to ski down anything as we don't quite have the backcountry knowledge to venture up a slope, just looking for the exercise and some skinning practice. Looking for any other recs as well?
    The road is packed snow at the parking area on the south side/north facing. The north side/south facing is bare dirt.... There was at least a hundred skiers headed up the road this morning...
    You could also skin up the guardsman road, Mill Creek, or SR-65
    When life gives you haters, make haterade.

  24. #1124
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    754
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirshredalot View Post
    My understanding is that patrol has never had the authority to open or close that gate. You leave it, you're on your own and the resort is never going to tell you that it's "okay" or not.

    Given how often Sound of Music gets skied and how mellow and tasty it looks, it sure does move.


    Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
    Sound of Music is really deceptive, I think it's a really dangerous place. With all of the rollovers, Dutch is one of the most dangerous places in the Wasatch.

    I left PC shortly after the 9990 Chair went in. If they had made the gate lower requiring a skin to get to the ridge it would have weeded out a lot of unprepared skiers.

    Not nearly as much as leather boots and 55mm waisted skis did though.

  25. #1125
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,633
    Quote Originally Posted by TheK12 View Post
    How far up the road does the snow start in the Donut Falls Trail area? Was thinking this would be a nice safe walk up a snowy road to get some exercise and just to be out somewhere. Not looking to ski down anything as we don't quite have the backcountry knowledge to venture up a slope, just looking for the exercise and some skinning practice. Looking for any other recs as well?
    Snow starts immediately but you gotta watch out for hoardes of sledders at the beginning. Park City lets you go up Home Run before 8:30am and after 6:00pm, more fun than the other options listed since you can actually make turns on the way down. If Alta starts cat skiing in Grizzly again then there will be a great cat track up from the summer road to Fantasy Ridge but its not in yet (if at all this year??)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •