
Originally Posted by
I've seen black diamonds!
Bump.
Our 2007 XC70 is still mechanically sound, but plastic bits are crumbling. The end is near, even though it isn't a daily driver at this point. I was hoping to hold out until an electric family truckster was viable for us, but it looks like it'll be a few more years at least. Maybe some of you can go all electric now, but I have some frequent drives that would be hassle without more range AND charging stations.
We have 2 kids and dog. We would use a third row for hauling extra people (mostly kids) on day trips, not road trips with lots of stuff. I use the ample trunk space in the Volvo frequently, but seldom when I have more than the five of us (including the dog) in the car. I think a smaller three row car would suit us well.
I'm leaning toward a used CX-9 as it looks to be the best combo of price, quality and reliability. I'm also interested in the new CX-90, but think I'd rather save the money than buy a new car that will be quickly marred by kids and a dog (and me).
I've also looked at:
Highlander- good car, but too expensive for what you get.
Highlander Hybrid - even more too expensive
Pilot- not bad, but the main advantage over the CX-9 is that it is bigger, which I don't think I need. And what is with all the recalls?
Telluride/Pallisade- Very nice car but, similar to the Pilot, I would be paying more for things I don't need (bigger, fancier)
Sorento- bad reliability ratings, the hybrid is lowered and no fucking spare.
Traverse- buying a chevy that isn't a truck seems... dumb
Ascent- like the Traverse, this seems too far from what Subaru does well.
Atlas- slow, poor mileage, will cost more to fix.
Nissan, Dodge, Jeep- Nah
AWD Sienna with a lift kit- Would be awesome, but surprisingly expensive and I don't really sleep in my car anymore.
What am I getting wrong? What am I missing? My kids are 4 and 9. Am I underestimating the amount of space we'll need in two years? Should I consider the previous generation Highlander? I've driven Highlanders, Pilots and CX-9's. The Mazda is the best to drive. The Honda is also quite good for how big it is. The Toyota is nondescript but has a pretty spotless history of being reliable generation after generation. Another Mazda advantage is that lower trims have leatherette seats, which my kids and dog will destroy more slowly. I want durable seats, but I don't want to pay for a bunch of pointless "features." Toyota especially seems to save the leatherette for fancier trim levels. I don't give a damn how big my infotainment screen is.
Anyway, I'm not psyched to spend a lot of money on this car as I see it as a box for hauling kids and stuff. It will deal with wet dogs, kids, waders and ski boots. Cheap and reliable is good. I'll drive to the middle of nowhere to go skiing, running, biking and fishing and on long fmaily road trips where a breakdown would really suck. But would the future resale of the Highlander (or Pilot?) make it worth spending the extra cash now? Am I underestimating one of these cars? What would you do?
Thanks
Bookmarks