Check Out Our Shop
Page 66 of 106 FirstFirst ... 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 ... LastLast
Results 1,626 to 1,650 of 2648

Thread: Official ATK Binding Thread

  1. #1626
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    404
    1/ Yes, get the toe shim. I haven't seen any new Evo-specific shims for sale so I'd assume the current toe shim will work for the Evo toes. ATK's own website also only shows one type of toe shim.
    2/ Yes, only the Evo 15 comes with the freeride spacer. However, there are Evo-specific freeride spacers you can buy for the Evo 13 (AL13). The old freeride spacers made for the Raiders (AL09) will not work on the Evos.
    3/ I actually tried 120mm brakes around the Machines I had (which I have since sold). They fit, but just about. To be honest, the brakes are pretty flimsy, and I highly doubt they'll stop a 126mm ski on a slope. They might be good for having the skis be stable while you click in.

    If you decide to go with the original Raider, I may look to sell some brand new black Raider 12s with 120 brakes and can include toe shim/freeride spacer. PM me if interested. Thanks.


    Quote Originally Posted by bossass View Post
    ATK binding JONG here. I'm sure I could go deep in the thread to figure this out, but, you know, I'm lazy....

    Setup I'm putting together:
    -Faction La Machine (126mm waist)
    -Shift Pro 130 boot
    -ATK binding?

    1. Seems like the 4mm toe spacer is a no-brainer here? Does the AL12 toe shim work on the new Evo bindings? Or only the Raider/Freeraider bindings? Is there an Evo specific toe shim if I happen to get some Evo 13/15 bindings?
    2. Only the Evo 15 comes with the Freeride Spacer, not the Evo 13. Correct?
    3. Will ATKs 120mm brake go around a 126mm waist? Seems like there's a good chance it will...

    Many thanks and taking suggestions on where to procure what I need here.

  2. #1627
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,479
    Quote Originally Posted by Spyderjon View Post
    The mounting pattern is as the regular Raider and Freeraider 16/14 models (but not the C-Raider), ie using the ATK jig is P3-P3-H1-H1 for the toes and for the heels it's H-H-H-H.
    Oh crap - didn’t realize raider and c-raider used different patterns - if so is C-raider not compatible with AL12 toe shims then??

  3. #1628
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    93
    Thinking about mounting a Crest 10 on a Black Diamond Helio 104 or Armada Locator 104. Would you mount this binding on a wide ski like that or use something with a wider pattern (R12?). If it matters: Not an aggressive skier, DIN 7, I ski with a Scarpa F1 / Maestrale RS...

  4. #1629
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Maine Coast
    Posts
    5,103
    No worries

  5. #1630
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    1,316
    Quote Originally Posted by dcpnz View Post
    Oh crap - didn’t realize raider and c-raider used different patterns - if so is C-raider not compatible with AL12 toe shims then??
    The original C-Raider had the same pattern as the Raider but a patent issue with Dynafit caused ATK to have to change the C-Raider pattern. The patent issue was subsequently resolved but the carbon reinforced plastic base of the C-Raider toe is one of the very few of ATK's outsourced components and the parts had already been ordered and it was to late to change it. And the C-Raider toe has stayed like that since. The rear toe holes of the C-Raider match of the Raider but the front holes are on narrower pattern and match the front toe holes of the Crest.

  6. #1631
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    2,274
    Quote Originally Posted by Spyderjon View Post
    The original C-Raider had the same pattern as the Raider but a patent issue with Dynafit caused ATK to have to change the C-Raider pattern. The patent issue was subsequently resolved but the carbon reinforced plastic base of the C-Raider toe is one of the very few of ATK's outsourced components and the parts had already been ordered and it was to late to change it. And the C-Raider toe has stayed like that since. The rear toe holes of the C-Raider match of the Raider but the front holes are on narrower pattern and match the front toe holes of the Crest.
    Kinda cool with ATK that we could do inserts with no overlap and fit all their different offerings...not quite sure if the spacing is far enough but at the very least they don't overlap.

  7. #1632
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by thejongiest View Post
    Kinda cool with ATK that we could do inserts with no overlap and fit all their different offerings...not quite sure if the spacing is far enough but at the very least they don't overlap.
    That would be a lot of holes close together in a ski.

  8. #1633
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sun Valley, ID
    Posts
    2,635
    Super tempted by those evo helio 200’s. Wish they had a double flipper.

  9. #1634
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    9
    Hey guys, I just purchased the FR16 to pair it with a pair of 4FRNT Hoji skis, for touring/freeride duties.
    I know that the release values of AT bindings don't correspond to alpine certified DIN settings, hence I am looking for some help with what value should I set it at. I previously used the Marker Tour F12 with the din set at 8.5, but it's my first experience with pin bindings and I am a bit worried regarding the high minimum "din value" of 9 (9-16 full range).
    I am 177cm / 70 kg (with the gear on) / BSL of the boot 275 mm / and an expert freeride aggressive skier, sending big drops and generally charging quite hard.
    I used some din calculators on the web and they suggested between 9 and 10.
    Any advice on what value should I set for my ATK FR 16?

    Someone told me I should have gone for the FR14, but one the one of the main reasons is that I got an extremely good price deal on the FR16 (200 Euros off) and also since the FR14 has the minimum value of 8 and FR16 has 9, I figured it won't make to much sense/difference.
    What do you guys think/say?

  10. #1635
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,633
    Quote Originally Posted by marcomarinescu View Post
    Hey guys


    I just purchased the FR16 to pair it with a pair of 4FRNT Hoji skis, for touring/freeride duties.
    I know that the release values of AT bindings don't correspond to alpine certified DIN settings, hence I am looking for some help with what value should I set it at. I previously used the Marker Tour F12 with the din set at 8.5, but it's my first experience with pin bindings and I am a bit worried regarding the high minimum "din value" of 9 (9-16 full range).
    I am 177cm / 70 kg (with the gear on) / BSL of the boot 275 mm / and an expert freeride aggressive skier, sending big drops and generally charging quite hard.
    I used some din calculators on the web and they suggested between 9 and 10.
    Any advice on what value should I set for my ATK FR 16?

    Someone told me I should have gone for the FR14, but one the one of the main reasons is that I got an extremely good price deal on the FR16 (200 Euros off) and also since the FR14 has the minimum value of 8 and FR16 has 9, I figured it won't make to much sense/difference.
    What do you guys think, say?
    I wouldn't worry about it too much, I ski an 8 on resort gear and 9 on ATK bindings and that has worked fine for me.

  11. #1636
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    DownEast
    Posts
    3,803
    I just got some Kuluar 12’s with 97mm brakes from Oliunid in Italy. Good price and fast shipping to US. Pretty sexy…

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	B190179D-AA41-46E1-B7C1-E43D9AC2790D.jpg 
Views:	145 
Size:	805.5 KB 
ID:	438966

    Although the spring loaded, push button brake retainer that grabs one side of the metal under the heel plate looks like it could be a pain in the ass…

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	58FEB660-3A33-451F-BE73-D580FD5C60FF.jpg 
Views:	152 
Size:	694.7 KB 
ID:	438968
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	08C89523-D30A-4A83-AC1E-1D00937ABE46.jpg 
Views:	141 
Size:	701.4 KB 
ID:	438969

    Anybody use these yet and how fiddly are they in the real world?

  12. #1637
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    2,274
    The brakes are not fiddly at all in the real world IMO. I have no issues with them at all.

  13. #1638
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Mid-tomahawk
    Posts
    1,722
    Quote Originally Posted by thejongiest View Post
    The brakes are not fiddly at all in the real world IMO. I have no issues with them at all.
    Do you rip your skins with your skis still on? Because I found reaching under my boot to deploy the brake while perched somewhere precarious to suck pretty bad. The mechanism works fine but it's not very accessible when you're in the binding.

  14. #1639
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Posts
    1
    Does anybody know how to remove the heel riser pin? It's an ATK Raider 12 and also found on Haute Route 10. There's no tool marking and I've tried a strong magnet as well. I'm looking to change the heel riser.

  15. #1640
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sun Valley, ID
    Posts
    2,635
    Quote Originally Posted by HAB View Post
    Do you rip your skins with your skis still on? Because I found reaching under my boot to deploy the brake while perched somewhere precarious to suck pretty bad. The mechanism works fine but it's not very accessible when you're in the binding.
    Brakes off leashes on.

  16. #1641
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Mid-tomahawk
    Posts
    1,722
    Quote Originally Posted by CaliBrit View Post
    Brakes off leashes on.
    Long since done.

  17. #1642
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    2,274
    Quote Originally Posted by HAB View Post
    Do you rip your skins with your skis still on? Because I found reaching under my boot to deploy the brake while perched somewhere precarious to suck pretty bad. The mechanism works fine but it's not very accessible when you're in the binding.
    That's fair, I don't do that, but I imagine (and I think it was discussed upward in the thread) that if the brake deploy was on the outside for both bindings would be easier. But the brakes themselves have no fundamental issue like icing or failures that I've ever experienced.

  18. #1643
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    2,274
    Hey, what should I use to grease the heel track and the freeride spacer sliders? I'm guessing KY fire & ice is not the right tool for the job

  19. #1644
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Posts
    30
    Mounted my new Wayback 88s with Trofeo+ 10s. Absolutely love the binding. Now that I'm in 2-buckle boots, I vastly prefer the race-style heel for simplicity. Also 100% onboard the leash train now.

    Honestly, kind of regretting the Freeraiders on my other skis now. I'll probably just start using cheap Trofeo+s for everything going forward. Maybe check out the Ski Trab Vario down the line.

  20. #1645
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    FR&CH
    Posts
    385
    R/FR are great for bigger guys, skiing the resort (touring from the lifts), and mounting on « real » skis > 2100g though

  21. #1646
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sun Valley, ID
    Posts
    2,635
    Anyone know if the al09 freeride spacer goes on the Kuluar? Sort of looks like it might.

  22. #1647
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    215
    Could use some help with people who actually know what they're talking about. I'm planning on getting some ATK bindings but seems like there is a lot of choice. The bindings would be for Armada Whitewalker 121s, my usual DIN is 8-10. Someone suggested the freeraider 14 for that but then I saw the raider 11 evo has a new toe release system that I think my knees could potentially appreciate. Skis would be used mostly for big powder skiing.

  23. #1648
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sun Valley, ID
    Posts
    2,635
    Quote Originally Posted by miketheskier View Post
    Could use some help with people who actually know what they're talking about. I'm planning on getting some ATK bindings but seems like there is a lot of choice. The bindings would be for Armada Whitewalker 121s, my usual DIN is 8-10. Someone suggested the freeraider 14 for that but then I saw the raider 11 evo has a new toe release system that I think my knees could potentially appreciate. Skis would be used mostly for big powder skiing.
    Toe release is not different. Just has some adjustment to the force as I believe.

  24. #1649
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,633
    Quote Originally Posted by CaliBrit View Post
    Anyone know if the al09 freeride spacer goes on the Kuluar? Sort of looks like it might.
    It doesn't. It only works on the Raider family.

  25. #1650
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,473
    I listened to the Blister's ATK / Davide interview podcast a few weeks back, and man - Davide just brings so much knowledge and humbleness to the table imho. He is a real boon to the sport.

    I especially enjoyed his take on alpine binding philosophies across brands - aka Marker=precision, Look=elasticity/suspension - it makes a ton of sense.

    And man, the new Evo's are just something else. Expensive as all hell, but why people would ever consider getting Dynafit Rotations when you can get R Evos is simply beyond me (but then again I hate Dynafit, so...). The level of engineering and performance that ATK packs into such a light package is simply incredible imho.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •