Check Out Our Shop
Page 307 of 601 FirstFirst ... 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 ... LastLast
Results 7,651 to 7,675 of 15019

Thread: Ask the experts

  1. #7651
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    23,143
    Quote Originally Posted by frorider View Post
    One of the ongoing threads within this shitshow thread is the perennial ‘what rear hub?’ question. Project 321 remains the benchmark as of 2022. I think I’ve posted before about the advantages over DT, CK, I9, Profile, yadda yadda. 321 is among the lightest but if you’re really focused on weight, order some Tunes from Germany
    I enjoyed my 321s, not too loud, instant engagement, not heavy, but not the lightest.

    P321 465g.

    i9 1/1 475g

    240EXP 54T 380g

    Tunes Hillclimb/kill 330g

    180EXP 54T 300g (all are 6 bolt except 180)

    P321s are significantly pricier than i9 101s. 240EXP are significantly lighter than P321s without being much pricier. I'm considering the i9s for my next wheels due to cost over the P321s and the 240s.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  2. #7652
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,933
    I still maintain that high engagement hubs make your suspension feel worse. A high engagement hub is essentially the opposite of those o-chain chainrings that reduce pedal kickback. Personally, I think around 50 points of engagement is the sweet spot.

  3. #7653
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Carbondale
    Posts
    12,708
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    I still maintain that high engagement hubs make your suspension feel worse. A high engagement hub is essentially the opposite of those o-chain chainrings that reduce pedal kickback. Personally, I think around 50 points of engagement is the sweet spot.
    I've wondered about that, especially given all the talk about kickback, etc that has been surfacing. I guess I always liked that buzzing sound behind me, whether my hub or a buddies, as it conjured images of a wu tang video and a swarm of killer bees coming to attack... Gotta ride fast then... right.
    www.dpsskis.com
    www.point6.com
    formerly an ambassador for a few others, but the ski industry is... interesting.
    Fukt: a very small amount of snow.

  4. #7654
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    2,852
    This is probably bound to start another civil war but I honestly know nothing about brakes these days and hoping for some restrained guidance.

    I’m currently running Sram G2 R brakes with hundreds of rides on them and as they’re approaching the need for another bleed I’m considering upgrading since I’ve never really liked them. I’m very used to the feel at this point but the levers have always had a ton of slop and mush in them and they don’t have the power to really shut things down when needed

    I’m looking for a nice mid quality brake that’s not stupid expensive. They’ll be going on a revel rascal that I use for everything. Weight isn’t really a concern since my bike is heavy as is. I’d say my riding is 85% trail 15% bike park and I do some casual DH racing in the summer

    I sort of like that my current brakes don’t have a super aggressive bite point since it allows for a better range in modulation, but the lever feel sucks. I also like that they require very little maintenance and have stayed reliable over the years. Is it stupid to just upgrade to a Code RSC or should I be looking at other brands? There’re so many options and opinions out there it’s overwhelming for someone who hasn’t kept up to date


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Quote Originally Posted by other grskier View Post
    well, in the three years i've been skiing i bet i can ski most anything those 'pro's' i listed can, probably

  5. #7655
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,747
    You'll probably find big fans of each brand of brake. Me, I like Shimano, a lot -- to the point where I will strip off any SRAM brakes that come on a bike, sell them, and replace with Shimano. YMMV.

    A non-fanboy point: if you have SRAM brakes and SRAM drivetrain, you may have a mount on your SRAM shifter that is semi-integrated into the brake mount. You can change brakes to other brands, but you will need to buy a separate shifter mount. They are cheap. Google "SRAM discrete shifter mount" and pick one -- ebay/ Amazon knockoffs work fine, it's just a band.
    https://www.ebay.com/itm/30226614243...RoCgusQAvD_BwE
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  6. #7656
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,933
    Quote Originally Posted by Wes Mantooth View Post
    This is probably bound to start another civil war but I honestly know nothing about brakes these days and hoping for some restrained guidance.

    I’m currently running Sram G2 R brakes with hundreds of rides on them and as they’re approaching the need for another bleed I’m considering upgrading since I’ve never really liked them. I’m very used to the feel at this point but the levers have always had a ton of slop and mush in them and they don’t have the power to really shut things down when needed

    I’m looking for a nice mid quality brake that’s not stupid expensive. They’ll be going on a revel rascal that I use for everything. Weight isn’t really a concern since my bike is heavy as is. I’d say my riding is 85% trail 15% bike park and I do some casual DH racing in the summer

    I sort of like that my current brakes don’t have a super aggressive bite point since it allows for a better range in modulation, but the lever feel sucks. I also like that they require very little maintenance and have stayed reliable over the years. Is it stupid to just upgrade to a Code RSC or should I be looking at other brands? There’re so many options and opinions out there it’s overwhelming for someone who hasn’t kept up to date


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Cheap option: upgrade to Guide RSC levers (keep your existing calipers). You'll get a much better lever feel, a little more power, and the contact point adjustability. If, after doing that, you still want more power, just get bigger rotors.

    Codes RSC's offer more power overall, a better lever feel, and about the same level of maintenance. But getting a set of Codes will cost a healthy chunk more than just getting new levers.

    I'll let someone else talk about how awesome Shimano brakes are, because personally I think they suck. Hayes Dominions seem solid, but they're about the same price as Codes.

  7. #7657
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    19,258
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    Hayes Dominions seem solid, but they're about the same price as Codes.
    Bike-Discount has a pretty sweet deal going on Dominions right now, even with the $50 shipping cost factored in: https://www.bike-discount.de/en/haye...&__delivery=28

    Good prices at Jenson, too, that are $30-40 less than Codes. Out of stock but site says more arriving Monday: https://www.jensonusa.com/Hayes-Domi...iABEgKpxfD_BwE

    Dominions also come with both semi-metallic and sintered pads (or at least they used to, been a while since I got any new ones), so factor a free spare set of pads into your pricing calculus.

  8. #7658
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    23,143
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    I still maintain that high engagement hubs make your suspension feel worse. A high engagement hub is essentially the opposite of those o-chain chainrings that reduce pedal kickback. Personally, I think around 50 points of engagement is the sweet spot.
    My P321s and Roost had 215 and 150 points of engagement respectively, and I never felt kickback. Nor do my current 36 point 350s feel better suspension wise.

    I do notice the 36 10deg engagement when I'm trying to ratchet a tech section, which I'm already not good at. I'll upgrade to 54T on these.
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  9. #7659
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Posts
    1,418
    I can't get myself on board with SRAM brakes because I just don't want to faff with DOT brake fluid. Big jug of mineral oil with indefinite shelf life and no concerns about cross contamination with bleed kit parts...easy.

    Thankfully it seems like a lot of bike manufacturers are on board with this as it seems common to spec shimano brakes with a SRAM drivetrain, but I can't say I often see SRAM brakes specced on a shimano bike. Thanks to this, I've been able to avoid making the decision to strip and replace SRAM.

    I guess I can be thankful that my road bike has mechanical brakes because I'm a SRAM fanboy there and there's no way to separate the shifter and the brake unit...

    but who knows...maybe they spec shimano with SRAM drivetrains because shimano brakes suck and they can get them cheap? I'm not someone who seems to care too much about different brake setups, so it is easy to just say "give me mineral oil"

  10. #7660
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,933
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    My P321s and Roost had 215 and 150 points of engagement respectively, and I never felt kickback. Nor do my current 36 point 350s feel better suspension wise.

    I do notice the 36 10deg engagement when I'm trying to ratchet a tech section, which I'm already not good at. I'll upgrade to 54T on these.
    The kickback would mostly be noticeable at slower speeds. And different suspension designs will have more kickback than others. But it's definitely there. And really, I don't notice it as actual kickback in the pedals, I just notice that my suspension feels a little less supple; the chain is restricting the suspension movement.

    Now, a lower engagement hub isn't going to make that much difference. And the difference it'll make is somewhat random - if the hub pawl is about to engage when you hit a bump then it doesn't really matter - you'll still get kickback because the freehub is engaged. But on a high engagement hub, the freehub is effectively always engaged, whereas on a lower engagement hub it can move a few degrees before it catches.

    Really what that all means is that, if I'm spending a bunch of money on a hub, I'm going to buy the one that has the lowest engagement that's still fast enough to work for ratcheting up techy sections. And for me, that's around 50 points of engagement. And weight, durability, and price are all things that are more important than engagement to me. All of which brings me back to a 54t DT 240 being the ideal hub.

  11. #7661
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Carbondale
    Posts
    12,708
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post

    Now, a lower engagement hub isn't going to make that much difference. And the difference it'll make is somewhat random - if the hub pawl is about to engage when you hit a bump then it doesn't really matter - you'll still get kickback because the freehub is engaged. But on a high engagement hub, the freehub is effectively always engaged, whereas on a lower engagement hub it can move a few degrees before it catches.

    b.
    I was going to get into this dorky stuff but was already playing engineer at work today... don't want to double dip.
    www.dpsskis.com
    www.point6.com
    formerly an ambassador for a few others, but the ski industry is... interesting.
    Fukt: a very small amount of snow.

  12. #7662
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,933
    Quote Originally Posted by grskier View Post
    I was going to get into this dorky stuff but was already playing engineer at work today... don't want to double dip.
    It's a lot more fun to just play engineer on the internet. Less consequences.

  13. #7663
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    2,852
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    Bike-Discount has a pretty sweet deal going on Dominions right now, even with the $50 shipping cost factored in: https://www.bike-discount.de/en/haye...&__delivery=28

    Good prices at Jenson, too, that are $30-40 less than Codes. Out of stock but site says more arriving Monday: https://www.jensonusa.com/Hayes-Domi...iABEgKpxfD_BwE

    Dominions also come with both semi-metallic and sintered pads (or at least they used to, been a while since I got any new ones), so factor a free spare set of pads into your pricing calculus.
    Shit that is a really good deal. $410 usd shipped for a full set with rotors. Tempting.

    Haven’t run Hayes brakes since my old pair of Hayes Nines like 15 years ago
    Quote Originally Posted by other grskier View Post
    well, in the three years i've been skiing i bet i can ski most anything those 'pro's' i listed can, probably

  14. #7664
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    19,258
    Quote Originally Posted by Wes Mantooth View Post
    Shit that is a really good deal. $410 usd shipped for a full set with rotors. Tempting.

    HavenÂ’t run Hayes brakes since my old pair of Hayes Nines like 15 years ago
    I would definitely recommend getting the D-series rotors. Even after cooking the shit out of mine on 200k+ vert of steep descending they were still perfectly true and didn't squeal.

    On a general Hayes/Manitou note, I may be an unabashed homer but I know the guy who runs the whole bike division there. His last job was head of Advanced Concepts at Fox and he's 110% committed to making the best stuff on the market.

  15. #7665
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Posts
    197
    Thanks John and Dannynoonan for the tips!

  16. #7666
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    2,852
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    I would definitely recommend getting the D-series rotors. Even after cooking the shit out of mine on 200k+ vert of steep descending they were still perfectly true and didn't squeal.

    On a general Hayes/Manitou note, I may be an unabashed homer but I know the guy who runs the whole bike division there. His last job was head of Advanced Concepts at Fox and he's 110% committed to making the best stuff on the market.
    I grabbed them, too good a deal! Got D series rotors as well, all for just over $400 shipped. Thanks for the PSA!

    Can’t wait to go otb immediately when I squeeze them like I squeeze my G2s
    Quote Originally Posted by other grskier View Post
    well, in the three years i've been skiing i bet i can ski most anything those 'pro's' i listed can, probably

  17. #7667
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    19,258
    Nice! Probably won't go OTB because the modulation is really good too.

    Want a bleed kit? I'm pretty sure I have a spare I could give you for shipping.

  18. #7668
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    8,278
    Just bought the Dominions, too. Thanks for the heads up.

  19. #7669
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,027
    I bought a pair of Dominions last year to replace some G2 R's that I hated. I love the Dominions. They are so good!

  20. #7670
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    NorCal coast
    Posts
    2,251
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    My P321s and Roost had 215 and 150 points of engagement respectively, and I never felt kickback. Nor do my current 36 point 350s feel better suspension wise.

    I do notice the 36 10deg engagement when I'm trying to ratchet a tech section, which I'm already not good at. I'll upgrade to 54T on these.
    I didn't notice my suspension feeling any worse going from DT 240s (54t ratchet) to Hydras. If anything I thought it felt better because there's no slop followed by a clunk.

    I did just order an O-Chain because I'm really curious how it feels. My GG has quite high anti-squat and pedal kickback, coupled with the Hydra should mean it's very noticeable. We'll see, if the Italians ever decide to ship it.

  21. #7671
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,747
    Did my first ever ride with a tire insert - a Nukeproof ARD, installed in the rear of a hardtail. Felt kind of wooden - normal? Used a little lower pressure than I would have without the insert, but wondering if I should drop it more.

    Also have a pretty good tire wobble going on, and am wondering if the insert isn't seated quite right inside the casing. Tire bead is seated evenly all around on the wheel.
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  22. #7672
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    23,143
    Quote Originally Posted by Andeh View Post
    I didn't notice my suspension feeling any worse going from DT 240s (54t ratchet) to Hydras. If anything I thought it felt better because there's no slop followed by a clunk.

    I did just order an O-Chain because I'm really curious how it feels. My GG has quite high anti-squat and pedal kickback, coupled with the Hydra should mean it's very noticeable. We'll see, if the Italians ever decide to ship it.
    So, O-Chain introduces fixed 6 to 12 degrees of adjustable slop to engagement on top of whatever your hub has (0-6.7deg on the 54t, 0-0.5deg on the hydra).

    But if you didn't notice a difference going from 6.7 to 0.5, why are you looking for an O-chain?
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  23. #7673
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    463
    Quote Originally Posted by Wes Mantooth View Post
    I grabbed them, too good a deal! Got D series rotors as well, all for just over $400 shipped. Thanks for the PSA!

    Can’t wait to go otb immediately when I squeeze them like I squeeze my G2s
    Hope you like them! I waffled on those when I was upgrading, but stuck with Shimano and went with Zees. I for one like the instant-on bite point

  24. #7674
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    9,117
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    So, O-Chain introduces fixed 6 to 12 degrees of adjustable slop to engagement on top of whatever your hub has (0-6.7deg on the 54t, 0-0.5deg on the hydra).

    But if you didn't notice a difference going from 6.7 to 0.5, why are you looking for an O-chain?
    Noticing it is going to be very personal. Some reasons have been noted, another is that if you tend to have the chain on a smaller cog for big hits that softens the effect compared to a big cog that moves more chain per degree (and effectively increases the inertial value of your legs/crank/pedals).

    Shifting up can also be a coping mechanism, but obviously only to the degree that you're comfortable.

  25. #7675
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Fish
    Posts
    4,855
    Why do people with used Trust forks still think they are worth $800-1000?

    You can literally find any other fork used for less.
    a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort

    Formerly Rludes025

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •