
Originally Posted by
EWG
Barron is not wrong, but I'd submit that it barely matters. Studies have shown that the difference between low reps/heavy weights and high reps/low weights are quite minor, and I'd bet none of us non professional athletes would notice. Personally, for legs I like high weights low reps because it conflicts less with my hobbies (less fatigue builds up in my experience.) I like the same for upper body cause it's faster.
Minimal exercises just to keep things solid (variations in parens are optional but it really helps things to mix it up):
Upper Body:
Bench press (incline, dumbbell, bar, push ups)
Curl (million variations)
Arm raise (sides, front etc)
Lat pulls (raises, pulls, rows - anything to hit lats)
Overhead Press (bar, dumbells)
Tricep (extentions, push downs, pull downs, etc)
Lower Body:
Squats (back, front, heel elevated, split, kettlebell, single leg)
Deadlifts (bar, dumbbell, single leg)
Lunge (front, back, side)
Hip Thrust
Calf Raise (single, double)
Don't forget abs.
Once a week is better than nothing, twice a week is great. You'll get 70% of the benefit of a full-on weight program by doing these exercises and variations thereof twice a week. That's massive and each routine can be done in maybe 20-30 minutes if you are set up and focused. Full program is more like 5 days a week and an hour per day which I don't have time for. I'll take the 70% solution - and it's probably more like 80-85% if you do it really well.
And you can add a million other exercises, but for me these are the ones you have to do to not lose function and to stay strong.
Bookmarks