Check Out Our Shop
Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9
Results 201 to 221 of 221

Thread: Bent Chet 120

  1. #201
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    cow hampshire
    Posts
    9,361
    Quote Originally Posted by JRainey View Post

    I just think these skis are too stiff for me.
    Interesting. I'm old school and always liked a big 208 stiff gs ski in my JH days, so maybe it's me. My kid has the shorter version BC's and we talked about swapping to give them a try. I'm going to need to do that. Also, the mounting point, like you mentioned, could or would? make a big difference. I don't ski switch (although teaching my boys to ski years ago I could link endless turns switch...at 5mph [emoji16]), so mounting back made the most sense.

  2. #202
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Schruns
    Posts
    892
    Yeah, try out the smaller ones and report back.

    I'm a snowflake about camber, which is why we broke up 15 years ago. The 184 to me are like, "What camber?".

    I grew up paramarking (free heel, no tele; a hereditary disorder), and you probably blew past my dorky ass on your 208s. But I got good fore aft balance from it and I don't like skis that don't like me use it.

    If I think of my storm day skiing, then mount point would help the problem. If I think about blasting off quicksand windlips, then only a softer flex or higher rocker will fix the problem.

  3. #203
    Join Date
    Nov 2022
    Location
    Carnorum Regio- Oltre Piave
    Posts
    143
    haven't read the older pages in the thread but have you ever owned/tried the older heavier version of the 184?

    if you haven't that would be the perfect ski for the usage you have in mind

  4. #204
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Location
    Truckee
    Posts
    1,366
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowMachine View Post
    I skied the 184 and while I loved touring on it, I didn't think it was enough ski inbounds. The 191 Renegade solved that problem. It's a grin machine. If I know I'm getting soft tracks it comes out. If I know I'm skiing all day and will get into chop, I grab the Line Blade Optic 114 (186).

    I love both of those skis and could be totally happy with either on soft days. The Ren is more fun for me. They turn sideways and drift, love turning into the fall line and are crazy quick in the trees/tight spots. The Blade Optic loves making GS turns over chop. They're stable and confidence inspiring. Totally different from a BC120.
    I thought about trying the Reckoner, also.

    So many skis, so little time.

  5. #205
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    cow hampshire
    Posts
    9,361
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowMachine View Post

    So many skis, so little time.
    That pretty much says it all. I say the same about mtn bikes. If I was good enough I'd say the same about surfing also. Speaking of which, check out Stab In the Dark. Pros on generic labeled boards comparing them. They know some of the shapers by the style, but not all. Someone should do it with skis also.

  6. #206
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,367
    So, I've been really enjoying more progressive, playful soft snow/powder skis this past season (shocker!). Now I'm thinking about picking up a 192 Bentchetler 120 for those perfect mornings skiing fresh pow in the Cascades. Am I totally wrong that this ski could be viable in the PNW? Too light? Help talk me in (or out) of a pair.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  7. #207
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    86
    I have one. It is only good on this perfect mornings with perfect powder. Than it is unreal fun beyond words.
    On all other snow conditions it is too light, too wide and too playful.
    Should you buy one?
    Yes.
    You will remember every day on that Ski

  8. #208
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Bellingham, WA
    Posts
    651
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    So, I've been really enjoying more progressive, playful soft snow/powder skis this past season (shocker!). Now I'm thinking about picking up a 192 Bentchetler 120 for those perfect mornings skiing fresh pow in the Cascades. Am I totally wrong that this ski could be viable in the PNW? Too light? Help talk me in (or out) of a pair.
    Owned a pair - they were great in untracked (Japan, touring, mounted with ATk fr14), but I ended up selling as they weren’t enough ski for PNW inbounds in my opinion. HL FR110/120 have both been great in that inbounds playful soft/deep snow ski role.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Let us so live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry - Mark Twain

  9. #209
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    512
    Quote Originally Posted by obi wan kenobi View Post
    I
    You will remember every day on that Ski
    This

    I have one and the days on them are special but rare in the last years. They are working best in untracked powder where you can charge, surf, slarve, jump, carve, whatever, the shit out of them. Decent performance on the piste as well as long as it’s not too hard and icy.
    The 192 are pretty light but have a nice backbone and are by no means noodles. Legs don’t get tired after a long powder day, though.

  10. #210
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,030
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    So, I've been really enjoying more progressive, playful soft snow/powder skis this past season (shocker!).
    [emoji16]

    This made me smile banditman.

    Now you just need a bunch of rockered skis in your quiver, and the transformation will be complete.

    KC


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    _________________________________________________
    I love big dumps.

  11. #211
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    1,586
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    So, I've been really enjoying more progressive, playful soft snow/powder skis this past season (shocker!). Now I'm thinking about picking up a 192 Bentchetler 120 for those perfect mornings skiing fresh pow in the Cascades. Am I totally wrong that this ski could be viable in the PNW? Too light? Help talk me in (or out) of a pair.
    Jeffery 118

    Or maybe the new 124


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  12. #212
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,367
    Quote Originally Posted by obi wan kenobi View Post
    I have one. It is only good on this perfect mornings with perfect powder. Than it is unreal fun beyond words.
    On all other snow conditions it is too light, too wide and too playful.
    Should you buy one?
    Yes.
    You will remember every day on that Ski
    That’s exactly where my head is at. I want that playful ski for those special days.


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  13. #213
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,367
    Quote Originally Posted by kc_7777 View Post
    [emoji16]

    This made me smile banditman.

    Now you just need a bunch of rockered skis in your quiver, and the transformation will be complete.

    KC


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I’ve been skiing more of those kinds of skis this past year. I’ve been enjoying putting a bit more finesse and fun into my skiing versus full throttle on metal laminate skis.

    I suppose anyone can change and evolve. [emoji6]


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  14. #214
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,367
    Quote Originally Posted by PeachesNCream View Post
    Jeffery 118

    Or maybe the new 124


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    So, the Jeff 118 is kind of the fall back. I bought some 191 Jeff 110’s from the Factory Finds, so maybe I just get a 118? It’s really not a terrible suggestion.


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  15. #215
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    1,586
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    So, the Jeff 118 is kind of the fall back. I bought some 191 Jeff 110’s from the Factory Finds, so maybe I just get a 118? It’s really not a terrible suggestion.


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums
    If you’re into progressive-mounted-playful-skis-with-a-backbone, it’s the best (imo of course).

    FR110 (and probably fr120) is a little more business and noteably looser, although I’m comparing the jeff116, and the 118 has less camber and is looser. And fr120 is supposedly stiffer.

    Reckoner series is also really really fun.

    Man there’s a lot of good skis in this category.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  16. #216
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    625
    A long time ago, I was musing about a Bent 120 shape with a heavier build for inbounds soft snow skiing. Like, a BC120 with a Rossi Black Ops 118 construction.

    Anyone find that ski? I got an eBay pair of used 184cm Salomon Rocker2s for less than $200, hoping they will be close. Shape and rocker profile is quite similar to the BC120, but they weigh about 2270gm each. So closer to the 186cm BO (2450gms) than the 184cm BC 120s (1780gms).

  17. #217
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Location
    Truckee
    Posts
    1,366
    Quote Originally Posted by DGamms View Post
    A long time ago, I was musing about a Bent 120 shape with a heavier build for inbounds soft snow skiing. Like, a BC120 with a Rossi Black Ops 118 construction.

    Anyone find that ski? I got an eBay pair of used 184cm Salomon Rocker2s for less than $200, hoping they will be close. Shape and rocker profile is quite similar to the BC120, but they weigh about 2270gm each. So closer to the 186cm BO (2450gms) than the 184cm BC 120s (1780gms).
    I have HL FR120 ST's coming. I'll, let you know how it stacks up. I skied and toured on the BC120 for a few years. Super fun ski, but a bit light for inbounds use. I'm hoping the HL's will share some floaty, loose fun, but with more damping and backbone.

  18. #218
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Bellingham, WA
    Posts
    651
    Quote Originally Posted by SnowMachine View Post
    I have HL FR120 ST's coming. I'll, let you know how it stacks up. I skied and toured on the BC120 for a few years. Super fun ski, but a bit light for inbounds use. I'm hoping the HL's will share some floaty, loose fun, but with more damping and backbone.
    Can confirm this is the case!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Let us so live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry - Mark Twain

  19. #219
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Emerald City
    Posts
    644
    Damn, I had the same thoughts about the bc120s. Talked myself in circles and ended up getting line vision 118s but they're just as light weight [emoji51] looks like I gotta jump on the HL waitlist...

  20. #220
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    625
    Heritage Labs!!! For the win.

    Love their stuff.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6274.jpg 
Views:	53 
Size:	606.4 KB 
ID:	505581

    Gonna try this for a bit first…

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6267.jpg 
Views:	57 
Size:	666.9 KB 
ID:	505580

  21. #221
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Location
    Truckee
    Posts
    1,366
    Quote Originally Posted by eSock View Post
    Damn, I had the same thoughts about the bc120s. Talked myself in circles and ended up getting line vision 118s but they're just as light weight [emoji51] looks like I gotta jump on the HL waitlist...
    I've been over in the Moment thread talking myself in circles over which tour ski to buy. The Vision 108 is high on my list, also.

    I can't wait to get on the HL FR120ST. They would have been a blast today.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •