Check Out Our Shop
Page 99 of 283 FirstFirst ... 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 ... LastLast
Results 2,451 to 2,475 of 7073

Thread: Moment Skis Discussion

  1. #2451
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    16,402

    Moment Skis Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by HAB View Post
    Current model?

    I just sold my backup 190 Bibbys and already have a tinge of seller's remorse. The pair I have in active rotation is in pretty good shape still, but they're so damn dialed and the lightening of the more recent ones (before they bulked up again for this year) makes me nervous.
    Yes, latest version. They do not get bucked around. They aren’t that light but they swing around as if they were (very easy to pivot).
    Last edited by TahoeJ; 01-28-2021 at 09:10 AM.

  2. #2452
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    1,483
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    They just in general have a better build quality.
    My old pair is 2012s so the boys at Moment have obviously improved their construction techniques a lot since then.
    My favorite thing about Moment as a company is just how much they put back into the product. I’ve been watching through the years and it seems like they are constantly buying better machinery, improving processes, and changing materials always with the intention of making a higher quality product and it really shows through their skis. I have been personally very impressed with their direction as a company and the end product. Also, I just absolutely dig that they were open minded enough to see the need for and, to implement a way to properly add some weight back in to the Wildcats, that attn to detail and the pulse of what skiers really want (which they obviously very much are) is very very cool.
    Fear, Doubt, Disbelief, you have to let it all go. Free your mind!

  3. #2453
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    2,121
    The 194 commander is hilarious, literal train tracks.
    It might be the most demanding wide ski I have ever been on though, with the forward’ish mount, a ton of camber and a really stiff tail it doesn’t accept anything other than perfect technique.

    Really fun ski, all you mammoth boys should get a pair.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	50BC5828-D1AB-48DB-9771-6353FA5847D9.jpg 
Views:	214 
Size:	352.2 KB 
ID:	360180

  4. #2454
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    744
    Awesome. Tell me about the Commander 124s... taking them out after this big storm wraps.

    Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk

  5. #2455
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    in the shadow of the white rocks
    Posts
    3,494
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    The 194 commander is hilarious, literal train tracks.
    It might be the most demanding wide ski I have ever been on though, with the forward’ish mount, a ton of camber and a really stiff tail it doesn’t accept anything other than perfect technique.

    Really fun ski, all you mammoth boys should get a pair.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	50BC5828-D1AB-48DB-9771-6353FA5847D9.jpg 
Views:	214 
Size:	352.2 KB 
ID:	360180
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	7F78CBC8-B087-4C29-9DE9-9681F7EBF2C7.jpg 
Views:	136 
Size:	483.7 KB 
ID:	360195

    Agreed!

  6. #2456
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Eastside
    Posts
    399
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    The 194 commander is hilarious, literal train tracks.
    It might be the most demanding wide ski I have ever been on though, with the forward’ish mount, a ton of camber and a really stiff tail it doesn’t accept anything other than perfect technique.

    Really fun ski, all you mammoth boys should get a pair.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	50BC5828-D1AB-48DB-9771-6353FA5847D9.jpg 
Views:	214 
Size:	352.2 KB 
ID:	360180
    Bring it to Mammoth, I'll ski it! [emoji16]

  7. #2457
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Los Angeles/Mammoth
    Posts
    1,407
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    The 194 commander is hilarious, literal train tracks.
    It might be the most demanding wide ski I have ever been on though, with the forward’ish mount, a ton of camber and a really stiff tail it doesn’t accept anything other than perfect technique.

    Really fun ski, all you mammoth boys should get a pair.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	50BC5828-D1AB-48DB-9771-6353FA5847D9.jpg 
Views:	214 
Size:	352.2 KB 
ID:	360180
    Completely agree. Got the new 108s in a 194 specifically for mammoth, and they are perfect for that open steep terrain at the top. Anyone around 6 foot 170 that has terrain like that should consider the longer length.

    Id get a pair of 118s too if i didnt already have some Wrenegade 114 189cm. Those skis are fucking dialed.

  8. #2458
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    64
    Got into some full throttle resort hard pack, tree run leftovers, and soft bumps on the DW for the first time today. Pretty rad ski. As a long time Bibby and wildcat lover, the DW feels like a light 112 WC that rages oddly hard on firm snow. Really fun. Nimble fucker.

    Been touring on the DWT for many weeks now and realized how much i like the idea of having a resort setup clone of one my BC setups. It was intuitive on those first BC days, and I could tell i liked it. But those turns matter so much i want them to be juicy, and having a heavier resort clone is kind of amazing for getting really comfy on a ski for when you do venture out.

    Current moment quiver - all 190s.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Moment.jpg 
Views:	184 
Size:	1.43 MB 
ID:	360272

  9. #2459
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by ender9099 View Post
    Got into some full throttle resort hard pack, tree run leftovers, and soft bumps on the DW for the first time today. Pretty rad ski. As a long time Bibby and wildcat lover, the DW feels like a light 112 WC that rages oddly hard on firm snow. Really fun. Nimble fucker.

    Been touring on the DWT for many weeks now and realized how much i like the idea of having a resort setup clone of one my BC setups. It was intuitive on those first BC days, and I could tell i liked it. But those turns matter so much i want them to be juicy, and having a heavier resort clone is kind of amazing for getting really comfy on a ski for when you do venture out.

    Current moment quiver - all 190s.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Moment.jpg 
Views:	184 
Size:	1.43 MB 
ID:	360272
    Well done here. I am considering going that In bounds/AT clone setup but with the 108 Cats.

  10. #2460
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SLC, Utah
    Posts
    4,746
    JONG question -

    there's a pair of wildcat tour 108's locally here, mounted once for shifts at the forward mount point - thinking of picking them up to try them out as a 50/50 ski. i'm light weight (150lbs) and not super aggressive, but i've always been curious about that ski. do you think it's worth trying?

  11. #2461
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Grand Junction Co
    Posts
    1,092
    Some people are fine with the tour skis for 50-50.... I don’t get along with tour cores inbounds.

    If I was looking 50-50 I’d go standard core.

    Quote Originally Posted by tgapp View Post
    JONG question -

    there's a pair of wildcat tour 108's locally here, mounted once for shifts at the forward mount point - thinking of picking them up to try them out as a 50/50 ski. i'm light weight (150lbs) and not super aggressive, but i've always been curious about that ski. do you think it's worth trying?

  12. #2462
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    2,121
    Quote Originally Posted by jdadour View Post
    Completely agree. Got the new 108s in a 194 specifically for mammoth, and they are perfect for that open steep terrain at the top. Anyone around 6 foot 170 that has terrain like that should consider the longer length.

    Id get a pair of 118s too if i didnt already have some Wrenegade 114 189cm. Those skis are fucking dialed.
    I have wren 114s too, and the 118 is a way different ski, you could definitely have both haha.
    It’s more demanding than the 191 2012 wren, the 192 cochise, 193/196 bodacious, 192 declivity x, 192 lp105.

    This might be the closet reboot to an M1/the fat garbone?

  13. #2463
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    423
    Quote Originally Posted by Tailwind View Post
    Some people are fine with the tour skis for 50-50.... I don’t get along with tour cores inbounds.

    If I was looking 50-50 I’d go standard core.
    Second this. I don't get how people ski tour skis for 50/50. I had Bibby Tour and regular Bibby and difference was more than notable. For now I decided that my strategy will be to drop weight by choosing lightweight bindings rather than dropping weight from skis. Moreover, touring skis (moment touring skis also) are more fragile, chip easier, etc. From what I observed, they can be trashed much faster.

  14. #2464
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SLC, Utah
    Posts
    4,746
    Quote Originally Posted by HukuTa_KydecHuk View Post
    Second this. I don't get how people ski tour skis for 50/50. I had Bibby Tour and regular Bibby and difference was more than notable. For now I decided that my strategy will be to drop weight by choosing lightweight bindings rather than dropping weight from skis. Moreover, touring skis (moment touring skis also) are more fragile, chip easier, etc. From what I observed, they can be trashed much faster.
    word. appreciate the input. for pure touring, i have the same quiver slot already filled by my CD104L's, so this would be redundant unless it was a 50/50 ski

    i thought i could get away with the tour layup because i weigh nothing and don't ski 90mph or do backflips (at least not on purpose) but it sounds like that's still probably not the case, eh?

  15. #2465
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,262
    Quote Originally Posted by bry View Post
    Awesome. Tell me about the Commander 124s... taking them out after this big storm wraps.

    Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk
    Way interested in this review.....

  16. #2466
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    25
    Quote Originally Posted by tgapp View Post
    word. appreciate the input. for pure touring, i have the same quiver slot already filled by my CD104L's, so this would be redundant unless it was a 50/50 ski

    i thought i could get away with the tour layup because i weigh nothing and don't ski 90mph or do backflips (at least not on purpose) but it sounds like that's still probably not the case, eh?
    I skied last season on WC 108 tours with shifts as a 50/50 setup and I thought they were great. I picked up some DWs this season and I do prefer them in the resort over my WCs, but I don’t hesitate to ski the WCs if I anticipate some side country laps that day.

    I also don’t ski 90mph or do backflips. My general feeling about that tour layup is that it wears my legs out quicker when the snow is crappy. But I was more than happy to ski them every day.

  17. #2467
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Grand Junction Co
    Posts
    1,092
    I’ll bite on this... I have Wren 114’s and love them. I don’t think it’s a demanding ski, surprisingly easy but powerful. I’m on the 189cm at 160lbs and I’ve wondered about a Commander as another take on the same style.

    What do you notice between the two? Everyone I’ve chatted with at moment has sworn up and down that I shouldn’t try the 194cm but I worry the 188 won’t work either.

    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    I have wren 114s too, and the 118 is a way different ski, you could definitely have both haha.
    It’s more demanding than the 191 2012 wren, the 192 cochise, 193/196 bodacious, 192 declivity x, 192 lp105.

    This might be the closet reboot to an M1/the fat garbone?

  18. #2468
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    2,121
    Quote Originally Posted by Tailwind View Post
    I’ll bite on this... I have Wren 114’s and love them. I don’t think it’s a demanding ski, surprisingly easy but powerful. I’m on the 189cm at 160lbs and I’ve wondered about a Commander as another take on the same style.

    What do you notice between the two? Everyone I’ve chatted with at moment has sworn up and down that I shouldn’t try the 194cm but I worry the 188 won’t work either.
    They’re almost opposites in that the w114 is slarvy, heavier and damp while the c118 is strong on edge, feels light on your feet has a powerful flex. Both skis allow you to ski fast and powerfully, but through different avenues. The c118 has an even higher top end than the w114 if you can hang on, you really notice how stable they are on groomers, no tip flap and just unrelenting confidence and grip.

    The wren is powerful and damp, but has more of a surfy slower moving style if that makes sense, you know what I mean.

    The commander on the other hand is much more traditional feeling as in you have to push hard forward and down deliberately into the ski. If you get backseat the ski just goes straight because the sidecut is huge and the tail is very stiff and long which can be kind of terrifying in the wrong spot. They can slarve and release from a turn, but it requires a lot more focus and precision than the wren. This is all in variable conditions by the way, in fresh pow they are sweet, I bet they’d be a hoot in alaska.

    I actually think the 188 would be really fun and much more usable in all kinds of conditions compared to the 194 atleast for me at 6,1 170lbs.

  19. #2469
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    343
    Quote Originally Posted by slowroastin View Post
    Anybody have a pair of Hot Mess’s for sale in a 162?

    Message me if you do. My girlfriend is not getting along with her current ski.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Not my sale: https://www.facebook.com/marketplace...8318102387658/

  20. #2470
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    905
    Quote Originally Posted by Alyosha_SP View Post
    Thanks, I’ll keep my eye one these. Someone here reached out to me with a pair. Looking to go that route first.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  21. #2471
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    336
    Just put New 2021 Wildcats up in Gear Swap. 184 cm. Pivot 15's.

  22. #2472
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    64
    Quote Originally Posted by SvenSki View Post
    Well done here. I am considering going that In bounds/AT clone setup but with the 108 Cats.
    I imagine i would be 100% happy on a WC/WCT or WC108/WCT108 setup - they are all money, imo. just pick your waist width. I pondered the 108 for a long time over the DW.

  23. #2473
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    64
    Fully agree on the train tracks. Thing rages through everything. Such a good chop ski. I was on the 188 / 118 commander and i totally agree - it requires your full attention at all times. It kicked my ass on a few occasions. The tail is a monster. But once you understand those traits and know how you have to ski when you take it out, its alll goood.

    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    The 194 commander is hilarious, literal train tracks.
    It might be the most demanding wide ski I have ever been on though, with the forward’ish mount, a ton of camber and a really stiff tail it doesn’t accept anything other than perfect technique.

    Really fun ski, all you mammoth boys should get a pair.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	50BC5828-D1AB-48DB-9771-6353FA5847D9.jpg 
Views:	214 
Size:	352.2 KB 
ID:	360180

  24. #2474
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    10
    Decided Ill be going with a standard WC108 190 with maybe a Cast system. Have a 188 PB&J and a 190 Bibby already with Pivots

  25. #2475
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    236
    Is there a chance to find a Wildcat 184cm discounted in a month or so on powder7 / Evo / Skiburger?. We are already mid-season and don't want to pay full price now.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •