Check Out Our Shop
Page 148 of 284 FirstFirst ... 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 ... LastLast
Results 3,676 to 3,700 of 7076

Thread: Moment Skis Discussion

  1. #3676
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    3,519

  2. #3677
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,110
    These two #triplecamber machines
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	foto_no_exif.jpg 
Views:	174 
Size:	1.37 MB 
ID:	403722
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	foto_no_exif.jpg 
Views:	130 
Size:	1.37 MB 
ID:	403721  
    TLDR; Ski faster. Quit breathing. Don't crash.

  3. #3678
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    236
    I just mounted the bindings on my Deathwish and found that the base were concave on both skis. Not my pic but it’s basically like this. How much is too much? What would you recommend? Stone grind? Check with Moment folks if I should stop by Reno?

  4. #3679
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Davis California
    Posts
    261
    Quote Originally Posted by iriponsnow View Post
    I've said it for years, Moment is missing the mark on the EC. I've got a Dave Wise Transition that I need to mount up for Low Tide.
    I’d love a pair of transitions but not sure if I’d find any. Also not sure if they made that ski in a 185+ length. 179/180 too short.
    Go Sox!

  5. #3680
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Lake Wallenpaupack, PA
    Posts
    2,317

    Moment Skis Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Flippo View Post
    I just mounted the bindings on my Deathwish and found that the base were concave on both skis. Not my pic but it’s basically like this. How much is too much? What would you recommend? Stone grind? Check with Moment folks if I should stop by Reno?
    Pm incoming….see the same thing with my true bar…/ can tell something is not quite right during my wax/scrape as I prep them to ski. (Iron is catching on the edges/wax is not melting as it should in certain “concave” spots….as the iron is riding on the edges/instead of gliding smoothly on base.)

    Gonna bring to Stowe this weekend to test them out..….I’m hoping they rip like my C98’s.

    I’ll wait to ski them before contacting Moment…
    Last edited by BC.; 02-02-2022 at 04:48 PM.

  6. #3681
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Front Range
    Posts
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by Flippo View Post
    I just mounted the bindings on my Deathwish and found that the base were concave on both skis. Not my pic but it’s basically like this. How much is too much? What would you recommend? Stone grind? Check with Moment folks if I should stop by Reno?

    Saw the same thing on my new WC108s - started an email thread with Moment asking for specs, and them picture in a follow-up. Looks just like yours - it's there, but seemingly not egregious. Curious what you find out.

  7. #3682
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    1,586
    DW 104 vs reg DW for 2 ski quiver in north idaho. I've read the DW104 is slightly more damp, does it lose any playfulness with that dampness? Any other noticeable differences in the two skis besides obvious width differences?

  8. #3683
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Gaperville, CO
    Posts
    5,929
    Quote Originally Posted by brundo View Post
    DW 104 vs reg DW for 2 ski quiver in north idaho. I've read the DW104 is slightly more damp, does it lose any playfulness with that dampness? Any other noticeable differences in the two skis besides obvious width differences?
    What's the other ski? If your other ski is larger, than DW104 for sure.

    Any loss in playfulness due to dampness isn't noticeable IMHO because you're on a smaller more agile platform.

  9. #3684
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,843
    Will the Donner Party ever make an appearance in the reserve section?
    Three fundamentals of every extreme skier, total disregard for personal saftey, amphetamines, and lots and lots of malt liquor......-jack handy

  10. #3685
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    1,586
    Quote Originally Posted by doebedoe View Post
    What's the other ski? If your other ski is larger, than DW104 for sure.

    Any loss in playfulness due to dampness isn't noticeable IMHO because you're on a smaller more agile platform.
    Other ski currently is a Protest but I'm thinking of switching to something I can use more days. Thinking billy goat, jeffery 116/118, mfree 118.

    I spend most of my time charging in chop or finding pow stashes and side hits in trees and wondering which deathwish will do better here. I have the deathwish tour as my touring sticks and love it in trees, in chop not so much, makes sense. Assuming regular layup will greatly improve the chop performance and just deciding between the two widths

  11. #3686
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Gaperville, CO
    Posts
    5,929
    Quote Originally Posted by brundo View Post
    Other ski currently is a Protest but I'm thinking of switching to something I can use more days. Thinking billy goat, jeffery 116/118, mfree 118.

    I spend most of my time charging in chop or finding pow stashes and side hits in trees and wondering which deathwish will do better here. I have the deathwish tour as my touring sticks and love it in trees, in chop not so much, makes sense. Assuming regular layup will greatly improve the chop performance and just deciding between the two widths
    I dont think an OG DW makes much sense with a BG / Jeffrey / mfree.

    The 104 is noticeably better on the groomed and bumps. I'd say "chop" is a wash because you have less width/mass in the 104, but a bit stiffer build. Which is better in chop i'd say depends on the chop in question...3in of high density == 104, 6in of medium density == OG.

    I was surprised at how well my 104s held up to cream cheese over trash at Silver a week ago. Despite being in the shorter length (I don't love skiing 190s when hauling sleds).

  12. #3687
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Reno
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by soul_skier View Post
    Will the Donner Party ever make an appearance in the reserve section?
    Some days we consider it....definitely not this winter.

  13. #3688
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    No longer Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    2,681
    Quote Originally Posted by doebedoe View Post
    I dont think an OG DW makes much sense with a BG / Jeffrey / mfree.

    The 104 is noticeably better on the groomed and bumps. I'd say "chop" is a wash because you have less width/mass in the 104, but a bit stiffer build. Which is better in chop i'd say depends on the chop in question...3in of high density == 104, 6in of medium density == OG.

    I was surprised at how well my 104s held up to cream cheese over trash at Silver a week ago. Despite being in the shorter length (I don't love skiing 190s when hauling sleds).
    Brundo - x2 to Doebedoe’s assessment of the DW 104. It should fit that spot in your quiver nicely. Go 190 if a lot of your skiing is more open terrain, 184 if you are at slower speeds in tight trees. I’m on the 190, I sometimes get behind it in firm bumps and the ski lets me know I’m being a b*tch

    I’ve got the WC 108 too and it hasn’t seen snow at all this January… the DW 104 carves way mo betta than the WC 108

  14. #3689
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,110
    Quote Originally Posted by Melee View Post
    Some days we consider it....definitely not this winter.
    Lets all hope for another miracle March like the one 3 years ago
    TLDR; Ski faster. Quit breathing. Don't crash.

  15. #3690
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,473
    Quote Originally Posted by Melee View Post
    Yes! We haven't had skis in the FWT since Craig and the Garbones.

    Lilly is awesome! Can't wait to see what she does on the tour this year.

    Also, Tyler Curle got 2nd in Revy at the 4* FWT stop. Kicking Horse up next!
    man, the women's field so a lot of carnage, but still - it is pretty damn awesome to see Commanders on the podium!

    Here's to seeing some action on the mens' side of things in the future, not leave the shredding to the ladies!

  16. #3691
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    1,586
    Quote Originally Posted by thefortrees View Post
    Brundo - x2 to Doebedoe’s assessment of the DW 104. It should fit that spot in your quiver nicely. Go 190 if a lot of your skiing is more open terrain, 184 if you are at slower speeds in tight trees. I’m on the 190, I sometimes get behind it in firm bumps and the ski lets me know I’m being a b*tch

    I’ve got the WC 108 too and it hasn’t seen snow at all this January… the DW 104 carves way mo betta than the WC 108
    I ski more tight trees than open terrain but I'm 6'3, 200lbs. Still think 184?

  17. #3692
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    490
    Quote Originally Posted by brundo View Post
    I ski more tight trees than open terrain but I'm 6'3, 200lbs. Still think 184?
    Seems like 190 for sure at that height and weight unless you regularly size down.

  18. #3693
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Gaperville, CO
    Posts
    5,929
    Quote Originally Posted by brundo View Post
    I ski more tight trees than open terrain but I'm 6'3, 200lbs. Still think 184?
    I'm 6'2" / 180. I'm on the 184 mostly because i end up skiing a lot of bumps and regularly with a sled.

    If i was freeskiing them all the time i'd go 190 I think. But i don't think the 184s would be way too short.

  19. #3694
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    3,189

    Moment Skis Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by brundo View Post
    I ski more tight trees than open terrain but I'm 6'3, 200lbs. Still think 184?
    Brundo,

    I am 6’4” and 210 and am finally clicking with the 190 DW 104 and no Fing way would I want to go shorter…. It is fast edge to edge and holds an edge like a mother… I think it is a breeze to ski and bumps are no issue…. Have not had them in trees but would have no worries as I think the DW skis short with the mount point and major kicked up tail…. Shit I wish it came in a 193…. No way would I want to go 184…


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  20. #3695
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Lake Wallenpaupack, PA
    Posts
    2,317

    Moment Skis Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by brundo View Post
    I ski more tight trees than open terrain but I'm 6'3, 200lbs. Still think 184?
    I’m 6’1 200lbs…..even in trees, I’ve never really considered downsizing….cuz these ski/blast so well on/through everything else.

    -188 C98
    -191 Katana
    -190 DW (haven’t skied yet, but assuming they will be great….lol)

  21. #3696
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    365
    Quote Originally Posted by brundo View Post
    I ski more tight trees than open terrain but I'm 6'3, 200lbs. Still think 184?
    I ski the regular deathwish at 5'11" 175lbs and have never felt the 190 is too long. They ski pretty short. Have no trouble in west coast tight trees. East coast woods would be a different story

  22. #3697
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    1,586
    Thanks all, I'll be on the lookout this summer for some 190s or maybe just buy some 2022s over the summer. I've got the DWTs in a 190 and wish I would have gone 184 (anyone want to size up?) but for touring I'm always in the trees, never in chop, and rarely rarely in the wide open, plus it'd save some weight. I agree that the 190 is the right move for resort tho

  23. #3698
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    52
    A few folks have mentioned having a concave base/other finishing issues with new Moments. I just picked up some DW104s--do I need to have the shop grind and do the bevels straight away? I confess I didn't even look at the bases when they arrived.

  24. #3699
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    236
    Quote Originally Posted by ejj View Post
    A few folks have mentioned having a concave base/other finishing issues with new Moments. I just picked up some DW104s--do I need to have the shop grind and do the bevels straight away? I confess I didn't even look at the bases when they arrived.
    I would not do it without checking. My other pairs of moment had a great factory tune.

  25. #3700
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    853
    Quote Originally Posted by ejj View Post
    A few folks have mentioned having a concave base/other finishing issues with new Moments. I just picked up some DW104s--do I need to have the shop grind and do the bevels straight away? I confess I didn't even look at the bases when they arrived.
    My DW104s were perfect out of the box, but always check no matter the ski/manufacturer IMO.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •