Just got back from a week in Hokkaido. They're having a rough year, but damn did we get lucky last week. 6 days with near-constant snowfall, capped with 2 days of cat skiing.
I went a little nuts on the gear shopping last Fall, including both 188 Protests and 180 BCs. Last week, I got in 4 days of inbounds and sidecountry, 3 days skinning and 2 days cat skiing, all in the greater Niseko area. I was on the Protests for 1 of the cat days and 2 in the sidecountry, and the BCs for the rest.
On the Cat Ski days in particular, I used the Protests on our first day (here's one run:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kotBVvNzwA ). It was a pretty tiring day and I was surprised at how tough it was. I'm not entirely sure if my technique was fatiguing me, or what, but the effort-to-stoke ratio was not what I expected.
So on the second cat day, I used the BCs and was super surprised by how awesome it was (here's the first run of the day:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEaZ2_0aCHE for an example of how the BCs performed in ~ 2 feet of freshies). I think I got heaps more maneuverability and only sacrificed a small amount (maybe 20%) of float.
Maybe it was just the crazy-light Hokkaido powder, maybe it was the length differential (188s vs 180s). Maybe if I was in heavy snow, the Protests would have stood head-and-shoulders above the BCs. I'm curious what other folks who have used both skis think about it.
Bookmarks