I thought the same thing you did with regards to circumventing public process but there's a little more to it that I'm not going to get into publicly. But the TNF had a stronger case that lawyers in DC were basically too lazy to fight on. It's unfortunately, incredibly typical. They rarely fight anything that's directly related to fire danger these days. Rolling over is easier for the agency and they have a long history of it.
But yeah, it won't change anything. 99% of ebike traffic......well yeah, we all see it.
I'm with you on what's a pretty big demographic buying these things. Yes disposable income but also being somewhat new to mtb, not likely to have a clue about land access issues. People said the same thing about mountainbikers in general for years: well to do, can mount their own legal battles. It still hasn't materialized. Instead we have the feckless IMBA dorks telling agencies how much they speak for mountainbikers while getting behind more wilderness designations in exchange for little townside bobsled tracks.
I do see it as just one more instance of likely creating another population that ignores rules because 'the rules' and dumb, and are just a result of rich whiners pushing around the forest service with lawyers.
Besides the comet that killed the dinosaurs nothing has destroyed a species faster than entitled white people.-ajp
Bookmarks