I want to know why Dynastar always lists these beasts at 2400g/ski.
I want to know why Dynastar always lists these beasts at 2400g/ski.
I always get a kick out of that too.
Sent from my SM-N981U using Tapatalk
Never weighed mine….what do they weigh?
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
I rip the groomed on tele gear
Mine weigh 2664/2660g
Sent from my SM-N981U using Tapatalk
They are over 9lbs per foot if you mount an all metal binding….
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Best Skier on the Mountain
Self-Certified
1992 - 2012
Squaw Valley, USA
Lightweight. Compared to 196 Motherships.
What were the heaviest 2000s skis?
I had 185 motherships w dukes. Soooo heavy. Wish I bought longer
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
I rip the groomed on tele gear
The 193 Nordica Helldorado was 2,700-grams per ski…
In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...
Fucking 190 Q-labs. Don’t even know have exact numbers but they measured 187 and weighed way more than the LPR.
My 183 Cham 107s were something like 200+ grams heavier than a 186 bodacious. With p18s they were...not light.
Fuck, what wasn't heavy as hell in the '00's?
XXLs, Big Dumps, Cham 127s('14?) from dynastar
Rossi 194 squads, sc 108s, rc 112s
Moships, el dictators, helldo's, big daddy's, im 103's, big stix 106, Solly rockers, everything wide weighed as much as a Volkswagen.
None of this faffing about and shmarving everywhere. Thank god for clown shoes.
Fuck, forgot how much solly rockers weighed.
I can’t believe I was considering buying those shoots… for Japan.
I bought the Maven as a cheap throw-away intro to five-point skis.
I hated everything about that ski. The running length. The softness. The width. The fact it folded in half. It couldn’t finish a turn. It was like surfing on cardboard.
I hated that ski while I loved it for teaching me how to ski powder sideways.
I wonder what the shoots would have taught me.
Anyone want a Maven? Buyer pays shipping. Only.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Gold Maven rules. Period. One of the funnest skis in my quiver. Gold Maven(2nd gen) were not soft. I'm 6'2" 220# w/out gear and I've never folded mine. I use mine for spring schmoo too. I still ski mine. LOVE that fuckin ski.
I don't think I've skied anything over 2800g. Holy grail territory if those skis can get little loose without losing any predictability.
How do the 192 MFree108s compare to the 190 Wildcats(108 or 118), in terms of stability?
https://classifieds.ksl.com/listing/59326053
I bet he'd take $50 for em. Now you just gotta get em to Japan.
I hope Tuco is right that the Maven had a better iteration, the one I skied was fucking abominable. But that was when we were all still DD'ing shit like 194 XXL's and Blizzard Titan Pro's and Monster 103's. Good times, murdering the mountain.
What happened? Did everyone get soft? Or is the new generation of hardcore skiers just smaller people in general?.. I always find the good skiers I meet to be smaller than larger, on average. Most larger folk I know suck shit, but obviously not all.
It seems like all the good big skiers got old. Most of the kids I see flipping around Squaw, way fucken better than me that's for sure, are smaller/thinner folk. They can rip around on QST 106 like me on LP105? I'm studying physics, who here is better at this and can explain this? I need some more applied in my realm.
Skis got wider. Skiing changed. Backcountry became a thing, people realized with rocker and new shapes and constructions skiing didn’t have to be hard to be fun. Skis don’t need to be dumb stiff to hold an edge anymore either. So basically skis got better…
None of those 10lb 40m side cut skis were actually that fun compared to most modern skis. They are fun to take out every so often but honestly you’re gonna have more fun on an M-Free 108 than an M-Pro 105 90% of the time. All the traits which made a 90-105mm wide skis not totally suck in crud aren’t really needed on a 110-120mm skis.
Last edited by XavierD; 08-24-2021 at 10:18 PM.
The man himself!
I find skis like that extremely fun for smashing ANYTHING without the ski folding. However, I do notice every year I get older now, it get's harder to ski them. NVM injuries added to the mix.
Still so much fun though. LP105 definitely in this category, but come on, no one makes a ski like this anymore. Like WTF HEAD!? 40m is way too much. 25-30 is plenty IMO.
Skis that do everything are great too, but I like skis that excel at blasting and nothing else.
There's got to be some money in it, just a little.
Yeah, that's a whole truckload of Fuck That for the Shoots.
And yeah, I hope Tuco's iteration (2nd Gen?) of the Mavens keeps him happy. Us First-Get purchasers were in it for the trial. Glad to have contributed. Unfortunately, if you treat your V1 buyers as testers, your company will fail. That said, I appreciate the opportunity to buy a test product for cheap to teach me what I should have been buying in my next purchase.
It's a win-win. Bluehouse was a fake company that taught a lot of skiers what they wanted to learn.
Thankfully, Praxis, 4FRNT, ON3P, Moment, Prior, weren't so foolish.
All of that said... in this thread... Why don't I own an M-Pro Rider yet?
Because it's only offered in one length, and the marketing has led me to believe that it's out of my league. Example A of ski manufacturer shooting itself in the foot. I don't want an MF108 182. I've wanted an M-Pro Rider in 186 for fifteen years.
Surely, I'm not alone. Maybe Philpug can pull his Pivot 15 clout in this direction. Get us smaller folk a ridable rig.
Last edited by gaijin; 08-25-2021 at 07:13 AM.
I was just gonna say, we need to find Gaijin a 184 AD pro model.
Bookmarks