Wouldn't you say the sudden failure in that video is probably a buckling event rather than some part hitting its ultimate strength and letting go? The panels popping off the top/compression side look like a pretty strong indicator that way.
Buckling being tied to flexibility, it's still related to elasticity, but the comparison to steel or carbon is different if buckling is the first failure mode.
You guys should loop The AD in on this. He's an actual Boeing engineer.
The panels popping off the top would be an indication that the rivets and welds holding the skin to the frame failed. That said, there were a lot of pops and bangs well before parts started flying off, so it's hard to say what failed first when you watch the video. I'm sure the boeing eggheads tore all that data apart.
I've concluded that DJSapp was never DJSapp, and Not DJSapp is also not DJSapp, so that means he's telling the truth now and he was lying before.
https://youtu.be/qt0sGb43OjI
I'm about to go in a trip that requires a bunch of flights and I've been watching all of these disaster reenactments.
Sounds familiar other than the cabin crew shouting orders that make it sound like a crash is immenent...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ght/767020001/
<p>
Aim for the chopping block. If you aim for the wood, you will have nothing. Aim past the wood, aim through the wood.</p>
Nice caption: An AirAsia flight fell 24,000 feet
Uhmm... no, it didn't.
Experienced an aborted landing yesterday. FlightAware shows the plane descended to 2,150 when the pilot pulled up and throttled out to 4,650. No prior communication so clearly an unplanned event. Low cloud cover so no visual. All combined to create a very disorienting experience. Scary stuff for this nervous flyer. Flight deck later said our plane got too close to the plane ahead.
![]()
Last edited by Mazderati; 05-02-2019 at 07:41 PM.
Good idea. I've done hundreds of trips back and forth over the Pacific and that ocean always seems to be where I've hit the biggest pockets. I too wear my seatbelt fastened at all times I'm not up. I always found it kind of comical seeing everyone fly up out of their seats in perfect unison, though.
I thought radar at this point was good enough to be able to ID mid to heavy turbulence and allow the pilots to avoid it.
I don't know the specifics on this particular incident, but there are basically only four types of naturally occurring turbulence, and as far as onboard radar goes, you can really only "see" convective/frontal. The reason for that is that the radar is just returning water droplets from cumulus, and cumulonimbus clouds. Turbulence associated with shears/jet streams would be clear air, i.e. invisible.
5th type of turbulence...
Russian turbulence:
Buckle up?
Originally Posted by blurred
Heh, must have missed this eight years ago!You guys should loop The AD in on this. He's an actual Boeing engineer.
I'm looking at it now and wondering how I knew what you did for a living. Did you (or Trebek) mention it on Jeopardy?
I see the quote function is still grabbing the wrong post. Kind of a spin the wheel, take yer chances!
Ha ha, didn't even notice that.
Bookmarks