Check Out Our Shop
Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 223

Thread: Decompression Event in an airliner

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    14,082
    Quote Originally Posted by steepconcrete View Post
    Cool. I was under the impression that it had the steepest descent rate of all major US airports. Local lore I guess.
    The final approach segment on rwy 27 is 3.5 degrees and "normal" is 3.0 so it is steeper, but since the airplane is in a high drag configuration at that point with the flaps and gear hanging out, it isn't particularly challenging.

    So it could be the steepest final at a major airport (I dunno) but it isn't crazy like some of the smaller mountain airports.

    Quote Originally Posted by 406 View Post
    Have you ever landed/taken off "6"(from the ocean side)?

    It's always interesting sitting next to someone who hasn't landed in SAN..."should the office building be this close?"
    Yes, but the other side is an upsidedown 6. Runways are named for their compass direction, so the two ends are always +/- 18 in relation to each other.

    And they're right. That building shouldn't be there. WTF were they thinking?

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    OREYGUN!
    Posts
    14,563
    Quote Originally Posted by pisteoff View Post
    And they're right. That building shouldn't be there. WTF were they thinking?
    At the hobby field Montgomery just to the east they made them take the top three stories off a building.

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    23,136
    I appreciate pisteoff's posts... are you a commercial pilot? What aircraft do you fly?
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    14,082
    Quote Originally Posted by hutash View Post
    Theoretically, the airline can say it is cheapest to have one pilot in the cockpit, and drop the requirement for a co-pilot.
    Nope.

    ICAO calls the shots.

    Boeing and Airbus certify their airplanes for two pilot operation.

    The rest of the world wouldn't allow entry of foreign carriers (US) that are non-compliant with international standards.

    Plus, we still have unions.

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    14,082
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    are you a commercial pilot? What aircraft do you fly?
    Yes, and currently A320. Previously B757, B737, CRJ.

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Upstate
    Posts
    9,770
    Business buddy of mine told a story of a long-haul in which he watched:

    - One of the pilots leave the cockpit
    - One of the stewardesses go in
    - 10 mins passed
    - Said stewardesses leaves the cockpit and proceeds to clean herself up (refresh makeup, etc)
    - Second pilot returns to the cockpit

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bottom feeding
    Posts
    11,762

    Decompression Event in an airliner

    ^^^ Do you recall if the pilot's name was Otto?
    Well maybe I'm the faggot America
    I'm not a part of a redneck agenda

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Upstate
    Posts
    9,770
    Classic. Remind me I have to play that movie for my kids.

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    General Sherman's Favorite City
    Posts
    37,203
    Quote Originally Posted by riser3 View Post
    It is an obvious and forgone conclusion based upon statements regarding the 'administrative state' by various people in the administration including Trump. And regardless of the amazing and highly dedicated people who work there today, they will be squeezed by budget cuts and culling of personnel who don't drink the kool-aid. Sad times. Air safety is just one of the many areas that will be dynamited in the coming years.
    Come on man, that's some serious chicken little sky is falling bullshit that is way too common these days. There's only so much damage one man can do when you have an entire industry and global aviation network of governments and agencies dedicated to air safety. If everyone keeps preaching doom and gloom about every single thing in this era we're all going to be very, very exhausted before the first year of his reign is even over. Breathe people. Trump isn't going to cause planes to crash into the sea any day now. Because:

    Quote Originally Posted by pisteoff View Post
    Nope.

    ICAO calls the shots.

    Boeing and Airbus certify their airplanes for two pilot operation.

    The rest of the world wouldn't allow entry of foreign carriers (US) that are non-compliant with international standards.

    Plus, we still have unions.
    Quote Originally Posted by pisteoff View Post
    Yes, and currently A320. Previously B757, B737, CRJ.
    I still call it The Jake.

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    OREYGUN!
    Posts
    14,563
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    I appreciate pisteoff's posts...
    X2

  11. #111
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    14,082
    Quote Originally Posted by Cono Este View Post
    Ive had some bad flights, but the worst was flying out of Buenos Aires and having the pilot announce their World Cup win. And if the dancing in the aisles wasnt enough, they mis caculated fuel and we made an unschedueled stop in Mexico. We spent six hrs parked by ourselves, in the heat, with no power. I would have preffered rapid decompression.
    The 6 hours on the ground stuck in that metal tube is the suck for sure.

    So you're really not going to like this, but I guarantee that it wasn't a miscalculation, and the company's dispatch planned it that way.

    The fuel requirement is to take off with enough to go to the planned destination, then divert to a secondary destination, plus an amount equal to a fixed flying time. Plus it takes fuel to lift more fuel, so if you need an extra 1000 lbs of fuel for the trip due to winds, you really need to add something like 1100 lbs because you'll burn the 100 to carry the 1000. (I'm making these numbers up)

    And there is a maximum takeoff weight for any given runway and meteorological conditions. So if it was really hot that day, it might have been that they couldn't carry a full load without making a fuel stop.

    On the more difficult legs to plan, dispatchers are often faced with the choice of adding fuel 'just in case', or bumping pax/bags, or just hope that it all works out (with the occasional fuel stop). It's a tough job for sure.

  12. #112
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    12,290
    Quote Originally Posted by steepconcrete View Post
    X2
    X3

    pisteoff- loving the insight you are providing.
    if you're bored I would love to get a commercial pilots opinion about the article I posted earlier

    http://www.vanityfair.com/news/busin...ight-447-crash

    It's long so don't feel you have to indulge me.

    The point about fuel stops meaning no bumped passengers/bags makes total sense but not something passengers would normally "get".

  13. #113
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    14,082
    Quote Originally Posted by huckbucket View Post
    Business buddy of mine told a story of a long-haul in which he watched:

    - One of the pilots leave the cockpit
    - One of the stewardesses go in
    - 10 mins passed
    - Said stewardesses leaves the cockpit and proceeds to clean herself up (refresh makeup, etc)
    - Second pilot returns to the cockpit
    -The PA button can occasionally get stuck.
    -Captain says to FO, "man, I could use a coffee and a blowjob right now"
    -Flight attendant (along with everybody else) hears this in the cabin, and walks quickly toward the cockpit to alert the crew
    -Old lady in first class stops flight attendant and says, "wait, you forgot the coffee"

  14. #114
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    17,751
    Quote Originally Posted by pisteoff View Post
    Yes, and currently A320.
    Nice. You'll be the prefect person to ask...could Natalia have any hope to land the plane in real life?

    "timberridge is terminally vapid" -- a fortune cookie in Yueyang

  15. #115
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    General Sherman's Favorite City
    Posts
    37,203
    Quote Originally Posted by Timberridge View Post
    Nice. You'll be the prefect person to ask...could Natalia have any hope to land the plane in real life?

    Didn't have time to watch it. Does she make it back on the treadmill safely?
    I still call it The Jake.

  16. #116
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    17,751
    I don't want to spoil the ending.
    "timberridge is terminally vapid" -- a fortune cookie in Yueyang

  17. #117
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    tetons
    Posts
    8,703
    i couldn't get all the way thru that but it looked about as successful as Melania trump trying to read to a bunch of kids

    skid luxury

  18. #118
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Access to Granlibakken
    Posts
    11,922
    Is it happy?

  19. #119
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    17,751
    I think a brief video tutorial such as above on how to land the particular plane you are flying on would be much more entertaining than the safety video in 3 languages they currently show.

    I once flew from EWR to YYZ. I had done this flight a few times before and we'd always taken something on the order of the 737-200, but this time a DC-10 rolled up to the gate. I got on this relatively empty large plane thinking Continental musta just run out of 737's. All of the sudden 100+ Chinese people on a tour get on the plane and fill the plane up. The flight attendant asks the the three Chinese guys in front of me if they understood that they were in an Exit row. She just wanted to make sure they understood the instructions she was about to give.
    One guy nods yes and says "Coca-Cola," the other guy says "me too."

    After a quick seat swap I had the Exit row to myself the whole way to Toronto.
    "timberridge is terminally vapid" -- a fortune cookie in Yueyang

  20. #120
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    General Sherman's Favorite City
    Posts
    37,203
    Quote Originally Posted by b-bear View Post
    i couldn't get all the way thru that but it looked about as successful as Melania trump trying to read to a bunch of kids

    To be fair I think English is her fourth language.

    And I didn't watch to the end but she stayed away from the flight controls as well which is good.
    I still call it The Jake.

  21. #121
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    17,751
    Quote Originally Posted by BmillsSkier View Post
    And I didn't watch to the end but she stayed away from the flight controls as well which is good.
    Models can be pilots...



    And that one is an interesting one...

    http://christinenegroni.blogspot.com...-offender.html

    Salacious skies indeed.
    "timberridge is terminally vapid" -- a fortune cookie in Yueyang

  22. #122
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Upstate
    Posts
    9,770
    Quote Originally Posted by Timberridge View Post
    I think a brief video tutorial such as above on how to land the particular plane you are flying on would be much more entertaining than the safety video in 3 languages they currently show.

    I once flew from EWR to YYZ. I had done this flight a few times before and we'd always taken something on the order of the 737-200, but this time a DC-10 rolled up to the gate. I got on this relatively empty large plane thinking Continental musta just run out of 737's. All of the sudden 100+ Chinese people on a tour get on the plane and fill the plane up. The flight attendant asks the the three Chinese guys in front of me if they understood that they were in an Exit row. She just wanted to make sure they understood the instructions she was about to give.
    One guy nods yes and says "Coca-Cola," the other guy says "me too."

    After a quick seat swap I had the Exit row to myself the whole way to Toronto.
    Listen up all you mouth-breathing TGR denizen!! Timberridge is a follow. Consistently bring the funnez. That is all.

  23. #123
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    14,082
    Quote Originally Posted by Timberridge View Post
    Nice. You'll be the prefect person to ask...could Natalia have any hope to land the plane in real life?
    I dunno, but when I was young and single, I would've tried to land Natalia.

    Quote Originally Posted by Timberridge View Post
    I think a brief video tutorial such as above on how to land the particular plane you are flying on would be much more entertaining than the safety video in 3 languages they currently show.

  24. #124
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    14,082
    I've just got to say that re: the accident Summit mentioned, Al Haynes the Captain of UA232, FO Records, SO Dvorak, and Denny Fitch the Check Airman deadheading on the flight, were true fucking heros. They should get the same (or higher) recognition as Sully. That crew did something considered unpossible: fly a DC10 without the flight controls. That is unquestionably considerably more difficult than gliding an airplane to an off-field landing.

    Nobody ever trained for it - because there's no point, you're dead. Capt Haynes could've lost his composure, or gone into autocratic order-barking mode - either would've ensured everyone's fatality. But instead, he collaborated with Capt Fitch, received feedback from the whole crew, considered suggestions/options, and delegated tasks. They quite literally saved 185 lives that day.

  25. #125
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,531
    Quote Originally Posted by pisteoff View Post
    I've just got to say that re: the accident Summit mentioned, Al Haynes the Captain of UA232, FO Records, SO Dvorak, and Denny Fitch the Check Airman deadheading on the flight, were true fucking heros. They should get the same (or higher) recognition as Sully. That crew did something considered unpossible: fly a DC10 without the flight controls. That is unquestionably considerably more difficult than gliding an airplane to an off-field landing.
    That's an amazing story and I agree. I'll admit I find reading about airplane crashes fascinating. The aero industry has learned an incredible amount from these tragedies and the average Joe probably doesn't realize how much more safe flying is today because of this.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •