Check Out Our Shop
Page 41 of 83 FirstFirst ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 ... LastLast
Results 1,001 to 1,025 of 2063

Thread: Climate Change

  1. #1001
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,754
    My take is that this is an all solutions at once approach that’s necessary. There are definitely plans being made for injecting CO2 into the ground for storage. Many provide multiple solutions. Wetland restoration in bays, coastlines, estuaries provide ecological benefits, assist with protecting inland adjacent built-out areas from sea level rise, provide recreational benefits, provide jobs (planning, development, and maintenance), and provide sequestration.

    In California, I see biomass as a necessary component for forest restoration, dealing with veg ag waste, and dealing with veg waste from landscape property maintenance. It seems a far better alternative compare to other options, such as high severity massive habitat transitioning wildfires, enormous open pile burns, and open ag burning.

  2. #1002
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,403
    My take is that we are totally fucked.

    Enjoy the day I guess.
    dirtbag, not a dentist

  3. #1003
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Shuswap Highlands
    Posts
    4,722
    Quote Originally Posted by bodywhomper View Post
    My take is that this is an all solutions at once approach that’s necessary.
    This ^^X1000
    In order to have measurable impact in the next few decades, all options, tailored to the local energy opportunities, ecology, and economy need to be implemented yesterday. Especially the ones that help preserve ecosystem resilience and economic adaptability. There is no silver bullet, but for the removal of our species from the equation. And I like being here, and providing that opportunity to my progeny.

  4. #1004
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,754
    “We can’t afford the luxury of nihilism.”

  5. #1005
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    10,687
    Whoa .... who said anything about ferrets in the bathtub?!?!?

    Absolutley, anything that produces a net, however slight, reduction in green house gases, should be employed if possible.
    The trick is to convince lazy, change resistant people to buy in and participate. The zombie cultists are a complete lost cause and no energy whatsoever should be wasted on them.

  6. #1006
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    757
    Quote Originally Posted by BCMtnHound View Post
    This ^^X1000
    In order to have measurable impact in the next few decades, all options, tailored to the local energy opportunities, ecology, and economy need to be implemented yesterday. Especially the ones that help preserve ecosystem resilience and economic adaptability. There is no silver bullet, but for the removal of our species from the equation. And I like being here, and providing that opportunity to my progeny.
    Yep , And it must be done in a way that doesn't create millions of poor people . Lets see what happens in Europe this winter . It's going to be bad when people can't afford heat ,they'll resort to burning everything and anything to stay warm ,definitely not friendly to the environment.

    As far as injecting C02 into the ground ...Bad Idea
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Nyos_disaster
    A seismic event could trigger a disaster.

    Ok ....flash forward Fossil fuels are gone .....Now all of the byproducts that are integrated into daily life will need to have substitutes , plastic in skis? Tires, computers ,pretty much start from scratch to re engineer life.

    Like RA says totally effed .....Good intentions can have detrimental un intended consequences ......

    Plant Trees!
    "It's only steep if you're backseat"

  7. #1007
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,754
    Quote Originally Posted by PB View Post
    The trick is to convince lazy, change resistant people to buy in and participate. The zombie cultists are a complete lost cause and no energy whatsoever should be wasted on them.
    I’ve been told that biomass in California has very thin margins. In most of NorCal, there’s also the issue of dependence on pge.

    Article on co2 injection in California: https://mavensnotebook.com/2022/01/0...26373291015625

  8. #1008
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    outer spokanistan
    Posts
    1,150
    Quote Originally Posted by PB View Post
    ....The trick is to convince lazy, change resistant people to buy in and participate....
    .
    that isnt going to happen soon

    carry on ....
    .
    "we all do dumb shit when we're fucked up"
    mike tyson

  9. #1009
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,880
    Quote Originally Posted by AirheadD8 View Post
    Yep , And it must be done in a way that doesn't create millions of poor people . Lets see what happens in Europe this winter . It's going to be bad when people can't afford heat ,they'll resort to burning everything and anything to stay warm ,definitely not friendly to the environment.

    As far as injecting C02 into the ground ...Bad Idea
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Nyos_disaster
    A seismic event could trigger a disaster.

    Ok ....flash forward Fossil fuels are gone .....Now all of the byproducts that are integrated into daily life will need to have substitutes , plastic in skis? Tires, computers ,pretty much start from scratch to re engineer life.

    Like RA says totally effed .....Good intentions can have detrimental un intended consequences ......

    Plant Trees!
    The fact that we don't burn fossil fuels doesn't mean we can't use them to make stuff, provided we can make that stuff without generating CO2. I'm totally ignorant of the chemistry involved and maybe that's not possible, or maybe it means completely changing refineries. Better yet, maybe we can make more stuff out of all the biomass we get from raking the forest.

    Quote Originally Posted by bodywhomper View Post
    I’ve been told that biomass in California has very thin margins. In most of NorCal, there’s also the issue of dependence on pge.

    Article on co2 injection in California: https://mavensnotebook.com/2022/01/0...26373291015625
    What do you mean by thin margins? I can think of a couple of ways to interpret that. And do you mean biomass for electricity generation? I assume that's what you're talking about, or do you mean biomass for hydrogen production?

  10. #1010
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,754

    Climate Change

    Thin profit margin for investors to get a facility built and operating, so I’ve been told… and I believe that’s both of those types of biomass facility. I conflated the two (energy and H production). Sry

  11. #1011
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,880
    Quote Originally Posted by bodywhomper View Post
    Thin profit margin for investors to get a facility built and operating, so I’ve been told… and I believe that’s both of those types of biomass facility. I conflated the two (energy and H production). Sry
    Thanks for clarifying. Yeah, like everything else about fixing the climate crisis it's going to require subsidies. We pay now or we pay later.

  12. #1012
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    757
    Article on co2 injection in California: https://mavensnotebook.com/2022/01/0...26373291015625[/QUOTE]

    Fracking ? Drilling wells ( using fossil fuel ) and injecting C02? Uggggg
    Plant trees if you want to sequester CO2 , some things don't need to be all that complicated .

    I live in a wooded area and it's consistently 6-12f cooler than the city I work in .
    "It's only steep if you're backseat"

  13. #1013
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,880
    [QUOTE}

    Fracking ? Drilling wells ( using fossil fuel ) and injecting C02? Uggggg
    Plant trees if you want to sequester CO2 , some things don't need to be all that complicated .

    I live in a wooded area and it's consistently 6-12f cooler than the city I work in .[/QUOTE]

    We could just all drink more soda and sparkling water.

  14. #1014
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    21,214
    not sure if this has been posted
    https://thehill.com/changing-america...nd-in-wyoming/

    not a word about trees in the article as a possible CO2 removal mechanism

  15. #1015
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    15,874
    Quote Originally Posted by ::: ::: View Post
    not sure if this has been posted
    https://thehill.com/changing-america...nd-in-wyoming/

    not a word about trees in the article as a possible CO2 removal mechanism
    Wouldn’t it take a while for trees to get big enough to make much of a difference even with planting hundreds of thousands?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  16. #1016
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    21,214
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    Wouldn’t it take a while for trees to get big enough to make much of a difference even with planting hundreds of thousands?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    yes, absolutely
    but that project ^^^ also hasn't broken ground

  17. #1017
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    15,874

    Climate Change

    Why not both? I’m not sure what you’re getting at by bringing up trees with that link


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  18. #1018
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    21,214
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    Why not both? I’m not sure what you’re getting at by bringing up trees with that link
    i was just surprised that there wasn't a benchmark to describe how effective this will be
    and trees struck me as our most obvious CO2 processors
    not criticizing the effort so apologies if that's how i made it sound
    "both and" strategy works for me for sure

  19. #1019
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    Posts
    12,122
    Best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. Second best time is today. As they say.

    Trees are great, so are other capture solutions, but the ocean is probably the best carbon sink if we can get the carbon into it.

  20. #1020
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Last Best City in the Last Best Place
    Posts
    8,223
    Underground carbon storage is going to be HUUUDDGE. I've read about other projects getting started in North Dakota. All those landowners around the Bakken who didn't own their land's mineral rights (or were outside the prime shale-oil play) could finally benefit financially because carbon storage is attached to the surface rights, not the mineral rights.

  21. #1021
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    10,549


    This popped up the other day. What say all about this guy's reasoning? Interesting.

  22. #1022
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,754
    That’s ^^ pretty interesting. In some areas of California, there’s been a rush to get first in the queue for permits for underground carbon storage. Same will soon occur for offshore wind.

    Trees: in California, there’s almost 2M acres of federal land that was previous conifer forests that were recently destroyed in high severity wildfire. There’s a bit of a conundrum about what to do next. Methods of reforestation may or may not be successful because of difficulty in implementing and maintaining the areas. Most of the discussion that I see revolves around previous lack by the federal government to successfully grow a forest and maintain it in such a way that it won’t be devastated by another high severity wildfire in 20-30 years. There are some success stories and many unsuccessful stories, but none at the scale of the current problem.

  23. #1023
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,880
    A lot of places where forest has burned will never grow trees again, due to climate change.

  24. #1024
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    15,874
    Quote Originally Posted by old goat View Post
    A lot of places where forest has burned will never grow trees again, due to climate change.
    I don’t really think that’s true. We probably won’t notice the reforestation but the trees will grow. Everywhere that I’ve gone into that’s had very hot fires, everything burned to bare soil, has new trees growing after a few years.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  25. #1025
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    757
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IeyP439HLFs

    As long as the CO2 stays where they put it! I’m thinking try that experiment where no population exists!

    Not much profit planting trees. Poplar trees grow pretty quickly I’m sure there’s other varieties that do as well. They also give off oxygen so there’s that too.

    Sparkling water and soda have side effects on me, I can change CO2 into methane 😁
    "It's only steep if you're backseat"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •