Check Out Our Shop
Page 31 of 83 FirstFirst ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... LastLast
Results 751 to 775 of 2063

Thread: Climate Change

  1. #751
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Bull City
    Posts
    14,003
    Armadillos in NC and TN are cute. What's really gonna be fun is when our lakes and rivers are full of gators. Sorry folks, no more water skiing or beach days inland.
    Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!

  2. #752
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    10,686
    Don't forget silver carp blunt force trauma.

  3. #753
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    757
    Quote Originally Posted by SumJongGuy View Post
    Armadillos in NC and TN are cute. What's really gonna be fun is when our lakes and rivers are full of gators. Sorry folks, no more water skiing or beach days inland.
    I heard gators taste like chicken.
    "It's only steep if you're backseat"

  4. #754
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Bull City
    Posts
    14,003
    Quote Originally Posted by AirheadD8 View Post
    I heard gators taste like chicken.
    So do people
    Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!

  5. #755
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Bull City
    Posts
    14,003
    California GAS STOP O?

    California votes to ban new gas car sales by 2035

    I can hardly wait for the onion version of this..
    Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!

  6. #756
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,880
    It will be interesting to see if there is anything close to the amount of charging infrastructure to accommodate even the number of EV's targeted for 2026, let alone the 2035 version. Or anything close to the amount of clean electricity needed to charge them. As it is California's grid can barely keep up. Without massive public investment in charging and clean generation there won't be enough people buying new EV's and clean power to make a dent in CO2 emissions. I expect we'll see people hanging on to their gas cars and trucks, especially in rural areas--we'll be like Cuba. It has to happen, but relying on subsidies and the free market alone--as in the Inflation Reduction Act or setting a fleet standard and expecting the other pieces to magically fall into place--ala CA--isn't going to do it.

  7. #757
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    757
    Quote Originally Posted by SumJongGuy View Post
    So do people
    Soylent Green .........Prophetic
    "It's only steep if you're backseat"

  8. #758
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In the swamp
    Posts
    12,103
    Anyone see the hotel in Pakistan get swept away in historic flooding? JFC

  9. #759
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,013
    The Pakistan flooding is bonkers.

    The death toll is going to be massive.

  10. #760
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In the swamp
    Posts
    12,103

    Climate Change

    Quote Originally Posted by simple View Post
    The Pakistan flooding is bonkers.

    The death toll is going to be massive.
    A THIRD of the country is under water?! What is it going to take to get people VERY serious about limiting the effects of climate change/weirding/correction/whateverthefuck?

  11. #761
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,013
    We tried doing nothing but that didn't work so we are all out of ideas. Not enough profits to be made.

  12. #762
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Alpental
    Posts
    6,679
    ^^^
    Now that's just the pluralistic ignorance and false social reality talkin'.


    Americans experience a false social reality by underestimating popular climate policy support by nearly half

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-32412-y

    Aug 23 2022

    Abstract

    Pluralistic ignorance—a shared misperception of how others think or behave—poses a challenge to collective action on problems like climate change. Using a representative sample of Americans (N = 6119), we examine whether Americans accurately perceive national concern about climate change and support for mitigating policies. We find a form of pluralistic ignorance that we describe as a false social reality: a near universal perception of public opinion that is the opposite of true public sentiment. Specifically, 80–90% of Americans underestimate the prevalence of support for major climate change mitigation policies and climate concern. While 66–80% Americans support these policies, Americans estimate the prevalence to only be between 37–43% on average. Thus, supporters of climate policies outnumber opponents two to one, while Americans falsely perceive nearly the opposite to be true. Further, Americans in every state and every assessed demographic underestimate support across all polices tested. Preliminary evidence suggests three sources of these misperceptions: (i) consistent with a false consensus effect, respondents who support these policies less (conservatives) underestimate support by a greater degree; controlling for one’s own personal politics, (ii) exposure to more conservative local norms and (iii) consuming conservative news correspond to greater misperceptions.
    Move upside and let the man go through...

  13. #763
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    22,532
    Quote Originally Posted by simple View Post
    We tried doing nothing but that didn't work so we are all out of ideas. Not enough profits to be made.
    Cognitive dissonance

    Kill yourself. Or at the very least stop lift served skiing.
    It contributes nothing to society.

    The sad thing is we’re all killing Gaia.

  14. #764
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Ootarded
    Posts
    4,093
    Or better yet, kill the propagandists that promulgate that false social reality.

    Okay, "kill" perhaps too strong, but they should be gone.

    Rupert needs to die already, even though Lachlan will sadly carry the torch.

  15. #765
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In the swamp
    Posts
    12,103
    The deniers will say meh, so the oceans rise 10”. That’s nothing! Why are we freaking out over 10” of beach vertical lost?

  16. #766
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Bull City
    Posts
    14,003
    They probably had similar conversations on Mars a billion years ago..
    Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!

  17. #767
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,647
    Quote Originally Posted by CoorsLight99 View Post
    I don't think there are any deniers.

    Plenty of people might question whether moving away from fossil fuels that have become extremely efficient recently is a good idea. But that is hardly denying.

    I'd rather idiots stop depleting the CO river and move somewhere else or just use bottled water if they are rich and can afford it that would do more than driving an electric car who's battery is going to end up in a landfill along with all the solar panels and other nasty things there will be no usable ground water in a couple decades because of 'green' technologies once they are past their lifespan and are buried.
    Proof there are still deniers^^

  18. #768
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,880
    Gee I didn't know you could run a car on corn syrup.
    Need to check the pantry.

  19. #769
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    156
    Quote Originally Posted by Mofro261 View Post
    ^^^
    Now that's just the pluralistic ignorance and false social reality talkin'.


    Americans experience a false social reality by underestimating popular climate policy support by nearly half

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-32412-y

    Aug 23 2022

    Abstract

    Pluralistic ignorance—a shared misperception of how others think or behave—poses a challenge to collective action on problems like climate change. Using a representative sample of Americans (N = 6119), we examine whether Americans accurately perceive national concern about climate change and support for mitigating policies. We find a form of pluralistic ignorance that we describe as a false social reality: a near universal perception of public opinion that is the opposite of true public sentiment. Specifically, 80–90% of Americans underestimate the prevalence of support for major climate change mitigation policies and climate concern. While 66–80% Americans support these policies, Americans estimate the prevalence to only be between 37–43% on average. Thus, supporters of climate policies outnumber opponents two to one, while Americans falsely perceive nearly the opposite to be true. Further, Americans in every state and every assessed demographic underestimate support across all polices tested. Preliminary evidence suggests three sources of these misperceptions: (i) consistent with a false consensus effect, respondents who support these policies less (conservatives) underestimate support by a greater degree; controlling for one’s own personal politics, (ii) exposure to more conservative local norms and (iii) consuming conservative news correspond to greater misperceptions.
    Weird, I can’t imagine how that could possibly happen.

  20. #770
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    156
    Quote Originally Posted by old goat View Post
    It will be interesting to see if there is anything close to the amount of charging infrastructure to accommodate even the number of EV's targeted for 2026, let alone the 2035 version. Or anything close to the amount of clean electricity needed to charge them. As it is California's grid can barely keep up. Without massive public investment in charging and clean generation there won't be enough people buying new EV's and clean power to make a dent in CO2 emissions. I expect we'll see people hanging on to their gas cars and trucks, especially in rural areas--we'll be like Cuba. It has to happen, but relying on subsidies and the free market alone--as in the Inflation Reduction Act or setting a fleet standard and expecting the other pieces to magically fall into place--ala CA--isn't going to do it.
    Ok, I’ll bite, what’s the alternative?

  21. #771
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    156
    Quote Originally Posted by CoorsLight99 View Post
    I don't think there are any deniers.

    Plenty of people might question whether moving away from fossil fuels that have become extremely efficient recently is a good idea. But that is hardly denying.

    I'd rather idiots stop depleting the CO river and move somewhere else or just use bottled water if they are rich and can afford it that would do more than driving an electric car who's battery is going to end up in a landfill along with all the solar panels and other nasty things there will be no usable ground water in a couple decades because of 'green' technologies once they are past their lifespan and are buried.
    It ain’t just the mighty Colorado https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogallala_Aquifer

  22. #772
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,880
    Quote Originally Posted by Markeyz View Post
    Ok, I’ll bite, what’s the alternative?
    For starters, state takeover of PGE and SoCalEdison. Second, use taxpayer dollars as well as rate payer dollars to expand generating capacity as fast as possible with non-carbon sources. Third, adjust the fleet percentage of ecars based on increased generating capacity. California is big on mandates--mandated solar on new construction (Truckee gets a pass because no one makes solar panels rated for our snow loads), now mandated ecars. The state needs to take a more active role. It's not politically expedient--taxpayers like to see someone else do the heavy lifting--but we'll all drown, burn up, or die of thirst together, whether we drive cars and have solar panels or not.

    The climate crisis will not be solved without very big government. Americans will not like it.

  23. #773
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by CoorsLight99 View Post
    I don't think there are any deniers.

    Plenty of people might question whether moving away from fossil fuels that have become extremely efficient recently is a good idea. But that is hardly denying.
    Maybe it's because I live in Texas, but there are plenty of people here who believe that global warming is due to animals, agriculture, and normal weather cycles. At their core, their argument isn't centered on "How do we minimize carbon output" but moreso "Why do we need to minimize out carbon footprint?"

  24. #774
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,272
    Quote Originally Posted by Garfield3d View Post
    Maybe it's because I live in Texas, but there are plenty of people here who believe that global warming is due to animals, agriculture, and normal weather cycles.
    Name:  JFC.jpg
Views: 490
Size:  12.7 KB

  25. #775
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Bull City
    Posts
    14,003
    It's an evangelical religious thing. They have to blame God and at the same time believe the god that wrecked the shit will fix the shit and make it better.. That comes with the notion that it is blasphemy to claim that man has more control over what happens to the earth than god. Same with any non biblical science, evolution, etc...
    Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •