If you live on the coast, you should be sweating bullets: https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/20/clima...ntl/index.html
If you live on the coast, you should be sweating bullets: https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/20/clima...ntl/index.html
^^^and yet people will put their heads in the sand or they’ll act like it’s climate change fear porn.
I wish no one personal harm but this is what the world needs.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
While a lot of NA coastline is lined with the temporary abodes of the upper classes, most of the population of the coastline in the world is populated by the very poor. Who will suffer disproportionally far more than the wealthy ‘cottage’ owners. I’ll give your statement the benefit of the doubt, but I don’t think it’ll have the change effect you think it will.
That’s true but the cost for the maritime industry will be catastrophic. We need a wake up call, we have a very hard time making meaningful change until something awful happens.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Miami and NO will suffer the most. I think large areas of NYC, Boston and San Diego will be above water
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
126.1° in Delhi today, highest ever recorded in India. Terrifying.
No no nope. Its all marketing hype, not human caused and a plot to make the 1st world into the 3rd world.
I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.
"Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"
Lithium in fracking water?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-58887-x
The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there.
Nuclear waste disposal: space elevator with disposable cabins that can slingshot NW into sun.
<<spitball>>.![]()
The nuclear waste we have is from outdated nuclear reactors. We have better technologies despite low R&D.
I’m sure the technology is improving over time, but there is very little info on Gates’ reactor’s web site other than the new design “reduces the volume of waste produced”.
Details forthcoming, I guess.
Quick Google search finds this...
As with Generation II and III reactors, the non-reusable fission products, or waste, from Generation IV reactors will also have to be disposed of safely and stored permanently. The same applies to the waste that will result from the decommissioning of these reactors at the end of their lives.
https://www.polytechnique-insights.c...ation-reactor/
The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there.
We arent creating a bunch of brand new highly radioactive material for reactors/bombs, we are simply taking a shitton of barely radioactive material and concentrating it down (enriching it). So, lets figure out an efficient way to dillute and disperse it back into the environment, mimicking its original state. The solution to pollution is dilution is accurate, done at appropriate scale. Heck, im pretty sure that the spent fuel and radioactive waste has less radioactivity than the fuel when it was new, so we dont even need to dilute it over the same volume of material that it was extracted from.
If we dump radioactive waste into a volcano, would the radioactive elements sink, or float? Id assume sink, as i think of them as heavy. So if we dump the waste in, the radioactive elements would just sink down away from the surface lava and back into the earths core. Lets just dump waste into a nice stable volcano that has a super low chance of violently erupting.
Yer welcome. Problems all solved.
^that sounds like some coreshit conspiracy theories
Maybe chemtrails are just the governments nuclear waste dilution program. It was never about mind control. Alright, im done.
We do need to start throwing more money into Nuclear fusion technology. Its has been accomplished a few times now (on really small scales) and that is something that could legit solve all energy problems because of the vast amount of energy created from such tiny particles. It could have huge implications for not only here on earth with super computing, "clean" energy, etc, but also for powering space travel. I would really like to see that one crazy billionaire throw his considerable resources behind a worldwide push to advance this technology, instead of spending 50billion to be the king internet troll.
Fusion will be a hudge breakthrough
Sure, I don't see a problem managing our nuclear waste through dilution. We're doing it with our carbon.
Not diluted enough. Need to spread that carbon back into the earth where it was previously stored instead of injecting it into the air.
The solution, to pollution, is dilution. If you still have pollution, you aint got enough dilution. We just haven't figured out dilution at an appropriate scale yet. And also, shooting "pollution", whether is nuclear waste, etc, into the sun or deep space might be a bad idea as it would remove elements and compounds from the earth's relatively stable geochemical systems/cycles with no way to ever get them back short of asteroid mining i guess. So we should really either go all in on the high impact-high replacement strategy, or go all in on the low impact-low replacement strategy. Low impact seems like less work and less risky.
Bookmarks