Won't they get eaten by the alligators?
Won't they get eaten by the alligators?
https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/19/us/al...ate/index.html
Just another nail in the ......
Crabs need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps.
If you are like me & looking for some direction this helped me a bit in that regard
An important listen IMHO. Easy enough on my skibum brain FWIW. YMMV
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnEXEIp5vB8
Lots more Bill Rees available on youtube
Good reads in no particular order:
- The loss of happiness in market democracies by Robert Lane
- The limits to growth(~1972)
- Killing the host-Michael Hudson
- The spirit level- Richard Wilkinson & Kate pilcket
- The pitchforks are coming-written by a millionaire
- The spirit level- Richard Wilkinson & Kate pickett
- Lewis Powell-memerandum (~1971)
- Commanding Hope by Thomas Homer-Dixon
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Why should we stop travelling more when the loudest people telling us to do so have the biggest carbon footprint? I’ll travel less when bill gates and dicaprio take the bus.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
I don't know if climate change had anything to do with it, but I just read that Hurricane Otis went from a tropical storm to a category 5 hurricane in 12 hours. That's nuts. Acapulco is getting battered. 165 mph sustained winds. Wow.
Interesting, so you’re petty and spiteful. I don’t listen to celebrities or captains of industry when making my decisions btw, I use my conscience
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
If it’s a bad event it’s climate change. If it’s not, it’s just weather.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Although ...... too much good weather is a bad event too.
Since we like average weather as humans to decide where to live and more extreme Events are more likely due to climate change ( well except prolonged cold spells..hooray) you're right. Any deviation from average is bad. Drought, heat waves, extreme precip. So yes. Bad weather is more likely im climate change conditions.
It's a war of the mind and we're armed to the teeth.
On Nova they were explaining that in the Carboniferous Period when things were really flat and really wet a large of big trees were falling into bogs when they died, and were preserved in the low 02 environment, instead of breaking down and releasing their CO2 to be absorbed by new trees. These trees sequestered so much carbon that CO2 levels in the atmosphere fell, causing an Ice Age that covered almost all the planet. So a little greenhouse effect is a good thing. All things in moderation.
Why is a changing climate always a bad thing? There is likely upside to a warming climate. Think of all the farmable land that will open up in Canada.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
The soil is like an inch think up there, where they have any at all. That is why it dries out so fast and everything burns when it doesn't rain.
We had a record drought here in my home county and yields are still 130 to 190 bushels an acre vs a ten year average of 195, 219 last year. Most grass stayed green. Almost no fires. Because our soil is so good and continued to provide moisture to deep roots. A breadbasket for a reason.
You gonna truck all of our soil up to Ontario once it is too hot and dry to grow here? No.
Try again.
Sent from my SM-S911U using Tapatalk
Ontario may be big, but there’s more to Canada than just the shield. The prairies would love the climate of South Dakota.
But as a whole, the cost will outweigh the benefits. Last thing we need is more US refugees in our healthcare system.![]()
Climate change would not be a problem if we were still nomads. And even being mostly city folk we could probably adapt if change happened over millenia instead of decades. While there have been climate extremes far more dramatic than what we are facing in the next few generations they unfolded over much longer periods of time, and when they didn't--well ask a dinosaur how that worked out if you can find one.
It rains in Ontario though. And Iowa. We don't even irrigate 99% of cropland here. Exceptions are sand veins here and there, like in Muscatine where they grow melons.
The Dakotas and plains of Canada are in the shadow of the rockies. Definitely can be productive but not on the same level. Add some heat and that land becomes arid pretty fast, and water to irrigate coming off the rockies becomes ever more unreliable, not to mention already depleted aquifers.
Just saying, you can't just move everything north. It is delusional at best.
Further illustration of my point here. Fascinating stuff.
This article talks about the shifting of the 100th meridian dividing line east, due to climate change. Now more like the 98th meridian. Sustained drought keeps creeping our way.
https://www.earthmagazine.org/articl...ent%20research.
Sent from my SM-S911U using Tapatalk
Why is climate change bad? Uh, because it will displace/kill tens of millions of people. Farmable land in Canada is such a minor 'silver lining' detail in comparison to that. Trying to make the argument that "climate change must be universally bad in every measurable category in every situation to actually be considered bad" is such a ridiculous position that I think I've stumbled onto a satire post.
Not just about more farmland. But also less deaths due to cold. Cold deaths exceed heat deaths atm.
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
Bookmarks