Or, you know, you could wait anywhere from 30 seconds to a minute or two until there are good enough sight lines to pass safely for all involved.
Yes, you'll be going marginally slower for a little while. Does it really matter? Other than the sense of frustration (I get it, I drive a car too), what's the harm?
A road lane is probably anywhere from 8 feet to 14 feet wide. Assuming the bike is a foot or two off the fog line on the right, you'd still be hard pressed to pass with three feet of room (that's the law here in California and some other states) without going into an oncoming lane.
There's no difference one vs. two in terms of safety. To pass, you still have to go into the oncoming lane. If you pass even one cyclist without going halfway over into the oncoming lane, you're an asshole. Would you pass your child like that? No? Then don't do it to someone else's.
It just makes you more angry that they could be doing something that gets in your way. Recognize that.
Are you a robot asking how humans feel? You really don't know the answer? Are you a monk?
Why is there a reoccurring comment in this thread on how cars pass with 3 feet of room? Sure it's the law but in my experience people ditch that idea when there is no room and just buzz me. If I'm far right, they generally go slow by me because they know I am as far right as possible. If I'm two feet out on blind corners, they buzz me at a higher rate of speed and probably with a lot of anger. It makes no sense to me to be 1-2 feet out 99% of the time (when there are no parked cars). It's a lose-lose situation.
3 feet of room, yeah right. How many people even know this rule that doesn't bike?
Screw the net, Surf the backcountry!
And have any of the militant bike nazis been to Europe? In Italy, from my experience, they will mow you down.
Screw the net, Surf the backcountry!
Wait, who me?!
I'm all for sharing the road, but share is the key word.
Screw the net, Surf the backcountry!
Well at least I can't say you're self-centered. And my toddlers are a bunch better at sharing than people who get pissed at people out for a road ride.
I live close enough to work not to have to drive. Otherwise I wouldn't live here. Yep, I do have a car. Mostly to take me places to bike and ski.
This gets back to your earlier comment. Imagine you're biking on a road with no shoulder. maybe it's even a 4 lane road. So you as a cyclist take the right lane but it's spooky, you don't want to be there in a position you can get hit from behind. So the best thing you can do is take the lane, rather than hug the shoulder and encourage super sketchy passing along your left pinkie. Now there's a second bike. You both take up the lane, are far more visible, and at least you have company in the funeral home if you both get gunned down.
Less than 1/100th of a percent of my riding has been done like this, but my point is there is a place for it. Maybe even in the roundabout by your house. And since maybe as a driver "you" wouldn't know, the best thing you can do is de-rage and cut other people some slack (and I know YOU aren't buzzing cyclists or anything like that).
But this conversation keeps drifting into the notion that recreational cycling is selfish but it seems like many people, even here, are commuters and just trying to go about their lives. Same as the lady in the original video that was painted with a spandex brush. Not that there is anything wrong with people recreating, we should be able to make room for all purposes and people.
j'ai des grands instants de lucididididididididi
Except the crazy girl in the op vid reached into a car, committed assault, and larceny. All because of a horn honk.
Who knows what all happened but cooler heads should have prevailed.
I still call it The Jake.
Yeah, I'm totally fine... I'll give a toot so they know I'm there and pass them.
I drive slow as fuck on these roads... seriously. You should be so lucky as to have all drivers like me.
But on the highway, that's another story...
Screw the net, Surf the backcountry!
You must have missed my "cooler heads should have prevailed"
statement in my post.
Im no courtroom dentist but I remember enough from the bar of what constitutes assault and larceny. She committed both. You may not like it but that's why the police are looking for her.
If we have any NY courtroom jocks, maybe they could weigh in and tell us if being honked at very closely is an affirmative defense to these crimes.
I still call it The Jake.
1) what she did is, by law, a crime. Unless you don't believe in the law as it applies to others. In which case, good luck.
2) you lose. (Nothing personal man)
3) I don't own a video game on my phone so I can't act out your weird scenario even if I wanted to. Sorry.
4) if you still disagree just let me know where you'll be biking and I'll send DD's goons to follow you, take your water bottle or sunglasses and make a harmful or offensive contact with your face after you let out a loud noise. I'm told they're particularly rough.
I still call it The Jake.
Bookmarks