Check Out Our Shop
Page 51 of 108 FirstFirst ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... LastLast
Results 1,251 to 1,275 of 2680

Thread: Buying a 10+ year old car what could go wrong?

  1. #1251
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    The Garden State
    Posts
    4,910
    Original reference sensors on there? Just change em.

  2. #1252
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,379
    Quote Originally Posted by basinbeater View Post
    Pics please...

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using TGR Forums mobile app
    Nobody wants to see a photo of a 97 e320. Just go to any buffet eatery at 3:45 on a Tuesday and you'll see a half dozen of them, I instantly age 20 years when I drive that thing, it was a friend's father's car originally so i have an emotional attachment to it.

  3. #1253
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    below the Broads Fork Twins
    Posts
    5,771
    That's a nice car. Buddy has a gold wagon with 250k or so. Thing is a tank

    Sent from my SM-J327P using TGR Forums mobile app

  4. #1254
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    20,181

    Buying a 10+ year old car what could go wrong?

    The 2007 CL600 was misfiring (coil pack) and needed new engine mounts.

    $1400 including parts. Bargain compared to dealer. What a difference new engine mounts make on a car that powerful.

  5. #1255
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    8,278
    Quote Originally Posted by 4matic View Post
    The 2007 CL600 ....
    Nothing Says “Fuck You” Like A Mercedes-Benz CL600

  6. #1256
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    20,181
    Speed stats are way off in that article. Not 5.3. I've driven several CL550's. Pretty meh.. The Leather in the 600 is terrific. so fuck you! Lol. But yeah, that's probably why my dual pane passenger window got shot out in the safeway parking lot.

    Here's the facts fwiw:

    the 4800-pound CL600 will reach 60 mph in just 4.3 seconds. The quarter-mile marker blurs by at 113 mph in a brief 12.8 seconds, and that's just 0.2 second behind the fabulous new Audi R8 mid-engined supercar.

  7. #1257
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    General Sherman's Favorite City
    Posts
    37,265
    Yeah, but does it have a name?
    I still call it The Jake.

  8. #1258
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Watching over the valley
    Posts
    5,359
    Doug demuro is an idiot. Makes me want to give up cars when I hear him talk.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using TGR Forums mobile app
    sigless.

  9. #1259
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Upstate
    Posts
    9,770
    Quote Originally Posted by basinbeater View Post
    Doug demuro is an idiot. Makes me want to give up cars when I hear him talk. [/URL]
    Troof. I hate that guy.

  10. #1260
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    below the Broads Fork Twins
    Posts
    5,771
    I try to watch his videos but he doesn't spend much time driving. Jethro Bovington is more fun to watch, but I'm biased.

    P.s. there's a 72 911T with 268rwhp on BaT. Probably gonna go for silly money, but it's pretty to look at.

  11. #1261
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    General Sherman's Favorite City
    Posts
    37,265
    Quote Originally Posted by basinbeater View Post
    Doug demuro is an idiot. Makes me want to give up cars when I hear him talk.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using TGR Forums mobile app
    Yep.
    I still call it The Jake.

  12. #1262
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    TennesseeJed
    Posts
    10,987
    Quote Originally Posted by 4matic View Post
    the 4800-pound CL600 will reach 60 mph in just 4.3 seconds. The quarter-mile marker blurs by at 113 mph in a brief 12.8 seconds, and that's just 0.2 second behind the fabulous new Audi R8 mid-engined supercar.
    4.3 is pretty pokey, when cars are sub 3 seconds, for the same money.

    R8 V10 Plus does 0-60 in 2.8 and the 1/4 in 10.6. http://www.motortrend.com/cars/audi/...t-test-review/
    "I don't pretend to have all the answers, and I think there's something to be said for that" -One For The Road

    Brain dead and made of money.

  13. #1263
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    20,181

    Buying a 10+ year old car what could go wrong?

    Quote Originally Posted by Beer Drinker View Post
    4.3 is pretty pokey, when cars are sub 3 seconds, for the same money.

    R8 V10 Plus does 0-60 in 2.8 and the 1/4 in 10.6. http://www.motortrend.com/cars/audi/...t-test-review/

    In 2017. "Ten year old car" thread. I like a luxury car for long drives fwiw and with roads so crappy where I am a pure sports car is a pain.
    Last edited by 4matic; 07-15-2017 at 10:41 AM.

  14. #1264
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    7,390
    I spent an afternoon trying to convince myself to buy a 996TT. So much car, for so little money... I did not succeed. The car is ugly and boring to drive (relatively speaking). But more to the point - no one wants a 996 anything. They get the 996, because they're nearly free... But that car is a fucking turd on wheels. I've never driven another car that fast that felt so goddamned slow.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Conway View Post
    Hugh Conway sucks
    Quote Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper View Post
    I guess stfu might be right about steel toed boots
    Quote Originally Posted by pedoherp69 View Post
    I know actual transpeople.
    Quote Originally Posted by rokjoxx View Post
    We is got a good military, maybe cause some kids get to shooting sports early here.

  15. #1265
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Mayonnaisium
    Posts
    11,005
    Quote Originally Posted by Dromontana View Post
    It needs about $5k of refreshing from what I can tell over the next several years (suspension & hardware underneath), but the shots under the car are relatively good for a NE owned Turbo.
    Does $40-45k buy one that doesn't need work from a place where salt isn't an issue?

    Saw an older 911 C4 at dinner. Narrow body. Appropriately sized Fikse wheels. Looked nice.

  16. #1266
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    TennesseeJed
    Posts
    10,987
    I think 996 Turbos, are the next to start appreciating. If you really want it, offer 30k.
    "I don't pretend to have all the answers, and I think there's something to be said for that" -One For The Road

    Brain dead and made of money.

  17. #1267
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    7,390
    Quote Originally Posted by Mazderati View Post
    Saw an older 911 C4 at dinner. Narrow body. Appropriately sized Fikse wheels. Looked nice.


    The 993 might have been the last AC 911, but the 964 was the last one that actually looks like a 911.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Conway View Post
    Hugh Conway sucks
    Quote Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper View Post
    I guess stfu might be right about steel toed boots
    Quote Originally Posted by pedoherp69 View Post
    I know actual transpeople.
    Quote Originally Posted by rokjoxx View Post
    We is got a good military, maybe cause some kids get to shooting sports early here.

  18. #1268
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    20,181
    I suspect the air cooled retro Porsche fad ends soon

    How to Outsmart the Slump in the Classic Car Market
    https://bloom.bg/2tj8S6u

  19. #1269
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    7,390
    Quote Originally Posted by 4matic View Post
    I suspect the air cooled retro Porsche fad ends soon

    How to Outsmart the Slump in the Classic Car Market
    https://bloom.bg/2tj8S6u
    lFrom your mouth, to Jalopnik's ears...

    Re: New vs old car performance and value... The idea that the 996 is in any way a "better" 911 because it's faster is completely anathema to the premise of the 911. If you want the fastest car, or the best handling car, or the most exotic looking car, or really - the most "anything" car, you're not looking for a 911. And it's not even like it's an "attainable" supercar anymore, since the base Carrera is about as fast as a Ford Focus RS for twice the money, a GT3 RS is in the same ball park as a Ferrari 488, and a used GTR will blow the doors off anything short of a new Turbo S for $100k less. The 996 is a horrendous adaptation of a car that only excels at being itself. If you bought a 996 because it's fast, man are you going to be pissed when you're getting passed by stock Mitsubishi EVO IXs.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Conway View Post
    Hugh Conway sucks
    Quote Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper View Post
    I guess stfu might be right about steel toed boots
    Quote Originally Posted by pedoherp69 View Post
    I know actual transpeople.
    Quote Originally Posted by rokjoxx View Post
    We is got a good military, maybe cause some kids get to shooting sports early here.

  20. #1270
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    TennesseeJed
    Posts
    10,987
    Not sure I would call it a fad. Just a correction, to an inflated market.

    Bedroom Wall Status
    "I don't pretend to have all the answers, and I think there's something to be said for that" -One For The Road

    Brain dead and made of money.

  21. #1271
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    7,390
    Quote Originally Posted by Dromontana View Post
    I think you're projecting given you're the one obsessing over acceleration while driving a modded golf. A 996TT is faster than the Golf R, despite being 10-16 years older & comparably priced. Both from the factory and even more so in terms of tuning options. Your perspective isn't exactly reflected in market pricing, data or circles of people that actually drive the cars.
    #1 - a car being 16 years old rather than 1 year old is not an attribute.

    #2 - The Golf is incredibly easy to live with. The 996T only does one thing - poorly.

    #3 - I actually think the market pricing substantiates my opinion exactly. For cars with ~50k miles on the odo:

    930T - $100k-$150k
    964T - $110k-$220k
    993T - $135k-$175k
    996T - $40k-$50k
    997.1T - $60k-$70k
    997.2 - $75k-$95K

    Those X50 996 Turbos drove off the lot at about $140K... So, give or take, about 70% depreciation over 16 years. The 997.1 and .2 might eventually approach that same level of depreciation, as they were really just intermediary steps in correcting all that was wrong with the 996. But it'll be a looooooooooong time before you can buy a 991T with 50K miles on it for 70% less than msrp.

    The Golf R has an msrp of about $38-40k. I bought my '16 without the DSG/DCC/NAV and about 300 miles on it for $34k. Manual vs. manual, the 996T runs 0-60 in about 4 seconds. The Golf R takes about 5 seconds. Looking at historical values of the R series Golfs, even for the R32, which is widely regarded as the worst of the bunch, a 2004 with ~50k miles is sitting at about $18K today down from an MSRP of $29k, or roughly 38% depreciation over 13 years. My '16 has about 22k miles on it now, and I could sell it for $32-$33k.

    Re: mods - you must have been high when you posted this. I can get to a full APR stage 2+ with full brake kit, intercooler, clutch, flywheel, ecu upgrades, intake, downpipe, exhaust - roughly +100bhp, +100ft-lbs - for about $12K, including labor at $150/hr. The same project on a 996T has got to be in the ballpark of $25K - although I'm just guessing... I haven't actually seen a quote. Of course, that doesn't take into consideration that the 996T probably needs $10k worth of maintenance before you could even start upgrading anything.

    Bottom line - the 996T is a turd. It's ugly, it's slow and old compared to other cars you could buy for $40k, and those things make its impracticality far more of a detriment than it might be otherwise. The Golf R is a great car for the money. It's good looking, it does not look like it belongs in a Ken Block video, it's as practical as any hatchback on the market, and if you want one that will beat a 996T 0-60, you can have one for less than a 996T.

    Should we get into maintenance costs? I didn't think so.

    Those older AC 911's are something else. They're not in any way, shape, or form objectively "better" cars. But they are special. The 991 is moving back in the direction of the 911 being special. The 996T couldn't be less special if it had a Dominos delivery sign stuck on top of it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Conway View Post
    Hugh Conway sucks
    Quote Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper View Post
    I guess stfu might be right about steel toed boots
    Quote Originally Posted by pedoherp69 View Post
    I know actual transpeople.
    Quote Originally Posted by rokjoxx View Post
    We is got a good military, maybe cause some kids get to shooting sports early here.

  22. #1272
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    4,900
    I too would prefer the Golf to the Beetle.

  23. #1273
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    7,390
    Quote Originally Posted by Dromontana View Post
    Cool car, but not really in the same category as a 996 chassis.
    Totally agree - There's never been a golf r that was as big a waste of money as a 996T.

    Can you imagine being one of the people who bought one new? Holy shit... Like taking the titanic over the iceberg, plus points...
    Last edited by stfu&gbtw; 07-17-2017 at 07:01 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Conway View Post
    Hugh Conway sucks
    Quote Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper View Post
    I guess stfu might be right about steel toed boots
    Quote Originally Posted by pedoherp69 View Post
    I know actual transpeople.
    Quote Originally Posted by rokjoxx View Post
    We is got a good military, maybe cause some kids get to shooting sports early here.

  24. #1274
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    8,278
    Quote Originally Posted by basinbeater View Post
    Doug demuro is an idiot. Makes me want to give up cars when I hear him talk.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using TGR Forums mobile app
    Quote Originally Posted by huckbucket View Post
    Troof. I hate that guy.
    I'm a Luddite compared to the fancy car dweebos hanging out here despite a moderate amount of wrench time. Didn't know what 4matic's Benz was and googled it... found the first article in the search result amusing after a few beers and posted. Agreed that he is annoying and apologies for touching the nerve and douching up the thread.

    I'll crawl back under my Subaru now.

  25. #1275
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Watching over the valley
    Posts
    5,359
    Can't wait to take this one for a spin...
    Responsive handling.



    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using TGR Forums mobile app
    sigless.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •