Check Out Our Shop
Page 68 of 625 FirstFirst ... 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 ... LastLast
Results 1,676 to 1,700 of 15625

Thread: ON3P SKIS Discussion

  1. #1676
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,630
    Quote Originally Posted by jdadour View Post
    Never felt like the 190 Bibby was too long. I can maneuver them easily through steep moguled chutes. The Wren 189s might be a touch longer, but considering the Wren is lighter and narrower, I figured the 189 would suit me well too.
    Quote Originally Posted by jdadour View Post
    Good point on the Wren/Belfonte comparison. However the Belafontes have a longer effective edge in the similar length. 186 Belafonte: 156cm, 192 Belafonte: 164cm.... 184 Wren: 153cm, 189 Wren 158cm.
    Sounds like you want the 189.

    Edit: adrenalated is like 5'9" and 140# and skis the 184 Wren (actually, the old 186), so you should be fine on the 189.
    Last edited by auvgeek; 08-29-2017 at 11:45 AM.
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  2. #1677
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,431
    Quote Originally Posted by auvgeek View Post
    adrenalated is like 5'9" and 140# and skis the 184 Wren (actually, the old 186)
    I'm dumb though

  3. #1678
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    ColoRADo
    Posts
    5,957
    Quote Originally Posted by adrenalated View Post
    I'm dumb though
    5'9" and 140#? I think we are being a little generous on that weight...

    As for length questions, the only thing to keep in mind is that the Wren 108 189 has a noticeably longer turn radius than the 184. It does scale up accordingly, but it is noticeable. I

    I think for Jdadour and with what you posted I would tell you to go 189, as well. FWIW, when I am on wrens I ski the 184 108 most of the time at 5'10" and 190lbs, but I also have a much stiffer layup in my pair than stock so I would tend to still push you towards 189 if not going custom.

    Hey everyone...it is September. Winter is on the way!
    You should have been here yesterday!

  4. #1679
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Los Angeles/Mammoth
    Posts
    1,407
    Quote Originally Posted by PowTron View Post
    5'9" and 140#? I think we are being a little generous on that weight...

    As for length questions, the only thing to keep in mind is that the Wren 108 189 has a noticeably longer turn radius than the 184. It does scale up accordingly, but it is noticeable. I

    I think for Jdadour and with what you posted I would tell you to go 189, as well. FWIW, when I am on wrens I ski the 184 108 most of the time at 5'10" and 190lbs, but I also have a much stiffer layup in my pair than stock so I would tend to still push you towards 189 if not going custom.

    Hey everyone...it is September. Winter is on the way!
    Awesome thanks for the feedback PowTron! Definitely going with the 189s, sounds like a great fit for me. Stoked to get my first pair of ON3Ps! Now just need some snow.

    In the future if I were to do a custom build of the Wren 108, aside from changing the stiffness, how does the wood veneer (which looks absolutely gorgeous) change the feel, weight, and/or stiffness of the ski?

  5. #1680
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Moose, Iowa
    Posts
    8,111
    Wanted: one used pair of extra stiff 108 Wren 184's. Just in case anyone is holding
    Last edited by uglymoney; 09-02-2017 at 05:33 AM.

  6. #1681
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    8,159
    193 billygoat?

  7. #1682
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097
    Was there any possibility of a longer/wider wren prototype? I remember some chatter about a design like that, a few months ago.

  8. #1683
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097
    Maybe these??


  9. #1684
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,630
    Quote Originally Posted by jdadour View Post
    how does the wood veneer (which looks absolutely gorgeous) change the feel, weight, and/or stiffness of the ski?
    Originally, ON3P didn't account for the change in stiffness by adding woodgrain, which is how my 12.13 BGs ended up extra-stiff. But when I had them make me a back-up pair of woodgrain 191 BGs in 2014 or 2015, the first pair they made turned out too soft because they accounted for the added stiffness of the woodgrain. Fortunately, ON3P is awesome and keeps the details of every ski they ever built on file—they looked up the specs of my first pair by my email addy and made me a pair just like them (but stiffer in the tail).

    So basically, they started accounting for the stiffness added by the woodgrain but they can definitely make them stiffer if you prefer. I think the weight is the same, but I personally think they ski a little more damp than the std topsheet.

    In my personal opinion, if you're going to pay retail, the woodgrain is a great option.
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  10. #1685
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    16,402
    Quote Originally Posted by PowTron View Post
    Hey everyone...it is September. Winter is on the way!
    It's literally 112 degrees outside right now here. Not really feeling those winter vibes yet.

  11. #1686
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097
    Sheeees


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  12. #1687
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    ColoRADo
    Posts
    5,957
    Quote Originally Posted by Betelgeuse View Post
    Was there any possibility of a longer/wider wren prototype? I remember some chatter about a design like that, a few months ago.
    Let me drop another smirk here.

    You should have been here yesterday!

  13. #1688
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097

    2016/2017 - ON3P SKIS Thread (Finally)

    Awesome. Time to sell some stuff and save.

  14. #1689
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,184
    Quote Originally Posted by PowTron View Post
    Let me drop another smirk here.


  15. #1690
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Jackson
    Posts
    774

    2016/2017 - ON3P SKIS Thread (Finally)

    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeJ View Post
    This place is slipping. Magnets? How do they work???

    (A magnet strip rack is pretty clever tho!)
    But I want to know what polarity to have my edges in for max speed, or edge hold. Going to be very important for the big boy Wren that is coming.

  16. #1691
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097
    When will the 2017/2018 thread be up and running?

  17. #1692
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,027
    Quote Originally Posted by Betelgeuse View Post
    When will the 2017/2018 thread be up and running?
    After we all have our 193 Super Goats on the hill slaying the POW.

  18. #1693
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,630
    I know this is TGR and all, but I'm bummed the 174 BG was axed. Smaller men and women folk love them some BG, too!
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  19. #1694
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    8,278
    Last fall at the Bozone ski swap I scored a set of 166 BG un-drilled for my lil lady!

  20. #1695
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    8,159
    Quote Originally Posted by Kopi_Red View Post
    After we all have our 193 Super Goats on the hill slaying the POW.
    I like the super goat name...

  21. #1696
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    8,278
    XavierD has mentioned this... y'all know that the SuperGoat would be a lil overkill for just aboot every wannabe around here, probably even the clydes? Still intriguing...

  22. #1697
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,027
    Quote Originally Posted by Leavenworth Skier View Post
    I like the super goat name...
    I wish I could say I coined the phrase but I have to give the credit to PowTron.

  23. #1698
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    8,159
    Quote Originally Posted by Norseman View Post
    XavierD has mentioned this... y'all know that the SuperGoat would be a lil overkill for just aboot every wannabe around here, probably even the clydes? Still intriguing...
    But also unbelievably awesome... You can't tell me that you don't want a pair.

    Also, personally a SuperGoat is something I could see skiing (and buying) over a Cease and Desist. I think I'm not alone in that.

  24. #1699
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,027
    Quote Originally Posted by Norseman View Post
    XavierD has mentioned this... y'all know that the SuperGoat would be a lil overkill for just aboot every wannabe around here, probably even the clydes? Still intriguing...
    I'm a mere mortal so I doubt that I'd be able to handle zee power of zee SuperGoat but I can think of a skier or two on here who might be able to handle zee power. But alas I bought some used 191 Billy Goats so unless the price point of the SuperGoat's is too good to be true I won't be able to test myself against zee ultimate super ski.

  25. #1700
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    10,499
    Quote Originally Posted by Norseman View Post
    XavierD has mentioned this... y'all know that the SuperGoat would be a lil overkill for just aboot every wannabe around here, probably even the clydes? Still intriguing...
    Due to the stiffness? Since 193 isn't that long.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •